'Complete cessation of fire by Hezbollah': Lebanon and Israel agree to ceasefire after US talks
By The Economic Times
Key Concepts
- Trilateral Ceasefire Agreement: A US-brokered deal between Israel and Lebanon to end hostilities.
- Pilot Zones: Designated areas in Lebanon where the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) assume exclusive control, excluding non-state actors.
- Non-State Actors: Specifically refers to Hezbollah and the requirement for their disarmament and withdrawal.
- Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity: The core principle that the future of Lebanon and Israel must be decided by their respective sovereign governments.
- Nuclear Material Recovery: US plans to retrieve and destroy buried nuclear material in Iran using advanced military technology.
1. The Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire Agreement
On June 2nd and 3rd, 2026, the United States convened the fourth high-level trilateral meeting between Israeli and Lebanese representatives. The primary outcome was a formal agreement to implement a ceasefire to end ongoing hostilities.
- Conditions for Ceasefire: The agreement is strictly contingent upon a complete cessation of fire by Hezbollah and the evacuation of all its operatives from the southern sector of Lebanon.
- Security Framework: Both nations agreed to advance the creation of "pilot zones." In these areas, the Lebanese Armed Forces will take full, exclusive control, effectively removing non-state armed groups.
- Strategic Goal: The parties aim to build a foundation for a comprehensive peace and security agreement, emphasizing that the future relationship between the two countries must be determined solely by their sovereign governments, rejecting interference from external actors.
2. US Role and Policy Perspectives
The United States acts as the primary broker, emphasizing that any agreement must be reached directly between the two governments rather than through separate, indirect tracks.
- Support for Lebanese Sovereignty: The US committed to enhancing the capacity of the Lebanese Armed Forces to ensure they can effectively exercise control over their territory.
- Stance on Hezbollah: Secretary Rubio’s position was highlighted, characterizing Hezbollah as an enemy not only to Israel and the US but specifically to the Lebanese state itself.
- Regional Stability: All parties condemned Iran’s destabilizing activities in the Middle East, including its support for proxies and acts of aggression.
3. Iran and Nuclear Material Recovery
President Trump addressed the broader context of the US-Iran conflict, specifically regarding nuclear sites and recent military actions.
- Military Operations: The President noted that the US military has been conducting significant strikes against Iranian targets. He described the use of B2 bombers to strike buried nuclear facilities, noting that the technology used allowed bombs to follow beams into air shafts to ensure maximum impact.
- Recovery Mission: Despite the destruction of the sites, the US intends to retrieve the buried nuclear material. The President stated that the US and China are the only nations with the capability to perform such an extraction.
- Safety and Strategy: The President emphasized that he would not risk American lives in a ground operation while conflict is ongoing. The mission to retrieve the material is planned for a time when it is safe to do so, with the sites currently under constant surveillance by the Space Force.
4. Notable Statements
- Daniel Holler (State Department Chief of Staff): "The ceasefire is contingent on a complete halt to attacks by the Iran-aligned Hezbollah group and the withdrawal of its fighters from the southern Lebanese area."
- President Trump: Regarding the ceasefire in the region, he remarked: "A ceasefire there is much different than a ceasefire in other parts of the world," implying a more moderate or fluid definition of the term in that specific geopolitical context.
- On Nuclear Material: "It’s agreed that we will go in with them. We will get it and we will destroy it. It will be destroyed."
5. Synthesis and Conclusion
The trilateral meetings represent a significant diplomatic push by the US to stabilize the Israel-Lebanon border by empowering the Lebanese state to replace Hezbollah as the sole security authority in the south. While the ceasefire is a critical first step, its durability depends on the successful implementation of the pilot zones and the disarmament of non-state actors. Simultaneously, the US maintains a firm military posture toward Iran, focusing on the neutralization of nuclear threats through both aerial bombardment and future recovery operations, while avoiding high-risk ground deployments. The parties are scheduled to reconvene during the week of June 22nd to continue negotiations toward a comprehensive peace agreement.
Chat with this Video
AI-PoweredLoad the transcript when you're ready to chat so the initial page stays lighter.
Related Videos

Iran’s tactics, frozen funds put Qatar’s Hormuz mediation to the test, analysts say
Al Jazeera English

Why Oman has become a key diplomatic player in Mideast war • FRANCE 24 English
FRANCE 24 English

Strait of Hormuz: 'Iran has made it very clear that there are new rules', analyst says • FRANCE 24
FRANCE 24 English

'No troop withdrawal until...’: Netanyahu vows to stay in south Lebanon despite US-backed framework
The Economic Times

'From river to the sea…': Netanyahu rejects Palestinian statehood, triggering new pressure on Trump
The Economic Times

How the Iran war and peace talks are straining the U.S.-Israel alliance
PBS NewsHour

Rubio's diplomatic push in the Gulf: US secretary of state reassures GCC allies on Iran
Al Jazeera English