Make vs n8n—The Wrong Choice Will Cost You
By Stephen G. Pope
Share:
Key Concepts
- Automation Platforms: Make (Integromat) and n8n are both platforms for automating workflows and integrating different applications.
- Operations vs. Workflow Executions: Make charges per operation (each node execution), while n8n charges per workflow execution (entire automation run).
- Concurrent Executions: n8n limits the number of concurrent workflow executions, while Make allows unlimited concurrent executions on paid plans.
- Data Limits: Make has strict data transfer limits, while n8n does not track or charge for data transfer.
- Self-Hosting: n8n offers a Community Edition that can be self-hosted, removing usage limits but requiring server management.
- User Interface: Make has a more polished and user-friendly interface, while n8n has a more technical feel.
- Module Customization: n8n allows for more customization and control through JavaScript code, while Make relies on built-in functions.
- Webhooks: n8n offers more advanced webhook configuration options, such as test and production URLs and authentication.
- AI Adoption: n8n is currently moving faster in adopting AI features, particularly with its AI Agent module.
Pricing and Features
- Both Make and n8n offer tiered pricing plans (Starter, Pro, Enterprise) with increasing features and operation/execution limits.
- Both platforms allow users to select the number of operations/executions they want to purchase per month.
- Make: Charges per operation (each module execution).
- n8n: Charges per workflow execution (entire automation run).
- Starter Plan Limitations (n8n): Limited to five active workflows.
- Concurrent Execution Limits (n8n): Limited to five concurrent executions on lower tiers, upgradeable to 20.
- Data Limits (Make): Strict limits on data transfer and file sizes (5MB to 500MB depending on the tier).
- Community Edition (n8n): Free, self-hosted version with no usage limits but requires server management.
- Self-Hosting Considerations: While self-hosting n8n can be cheaper, it requires technical expertise to maintain the server.
User Interface and Experience
- Both platforms have similar navigation, with workflows/scenarios, templates, and credentials/connections.
- Make:
- More visually appealing with colored modules and auto-alignment features.
- More user-friendly for beginners.
- n8n:
- More technical feel with a gray interface.
- Requires more focus to identify modules at a glance.
- Modules have inputs on the left and outputs on the right.
Technical Differences and Similarities
- Module Configuration: Both platforms offer similar module configurations, but the interface and options may differ slightly.
- Testing:
- Make: Requires testing the entire automation, consuming operations for all modules.
- n8n: Allows testing individual modules and saving results for later use, saving operations.
- Data Manipulation:
- Make: Uses built-in functions for data manipulation (string functions, math, etc.).
- n8n: Uses JavaScript code for data manipulation, offering more flexibility.
- Webhooks:
- Make: Limited webhook configuration options.
- n8n: Offers advanced options like test and production URLs, authentication, and control over response timing.
- Triggers:
- Make: Only allows one trigger per scenario.
- n8n: Allows multiple triggers in a single workflow, merging into the same modules.
- Merging Modules:
- Make: Does not allow merging modules.
- n8n: Allows merging modules, enabling more complex workflows.
AI Adoption
- Both platforms are actively adding AI features.
- n8n:
- Moving faster in AI adoption.
- Offers an AI Agent module for conversational AI with tools and memory.
- Has Vector database tools.
- Make:
- Allows AI to build automations.
- Lags behind n8n in AI feature integration.
Why It Matters
- Choosing the right platform is crucial for long-term success with automation.
- Automations provide value only if they run consistently for extended periods.
- Incorrect platform selection can lead to wasted time, money, and effort.
Key Takeaways
- Make: Best for beginners, non-technical users, and businesses that want a powerful but easy-to-use automation platform.
- n8n: Best for advanced users, developers, and businesses with long-term strategic plans for AI automation and a technical team to support it.
- Both platforms can accomplish similar tasks, but n8n offers more flexibility and control at the cost of increased complexity.
- Consider long-term goals, technical expertise, and budget when choosing an automation platform.
Chat with this Video
AI-PoweredLoad the transcript when you're ready to chat so the initial page stays lighter.
Related Videos

Why Does This Guy Appear In Kids Videos?
sphynx

TIC en las Organizaciones - Electiva Complementaria II Unisimon
Julieth Güell S

How to Tame Your Advice Monster | Michael Bungay Stanier | TED
TED

Margaret Heffernan: Why it's time to forget the pecking order at work
TED

The importance of psychological safety: Amy Edmondson
The King's Fund

What Is Psychological Safety?
Harvard Business Review

13-Conflict Management: Listening in Conflict
Deliberate Development