Why North Korea just erased reunification with South Korea from its constitution | DW News

Key Concepts

• Two-States Policy: Kim Jong-un’s strategic shift to define North and South Korea as two separate, hostile states rather than one nation divided.
• Constitutional Revision: The formal removal of reunification references from the North Korean constitution to codify the new geopolitical stance.
• Armistice: The 1953 agreement that ended active fighting in the Korean War but did not result in a formal peace treaty, leaving the peninsula technically at war.
• Northern Limit Line (NLL): The disputed maritime border in the Yellow Sea, identified as a primary flashpoint for potential military escalation.
• Denuclearization: The historical centerpiece of diplomatic efforts between the U.S. and North Korea, now complicated by North Korea’s explicit threats to use nuclear weapons against the South.

---

1. Constitutional Shift and the "Two-States" Policy

North Korea has officially abandoned the long-standing goal of peaceful reunification. According to reports from the South Korean government, Pyongyang has revised its constitution to remove all references to reunification.

• Key Development: During a congress in March, Kim Jong-un formally labeled South Korea as the "most hostile state."
• Legal Implications: The new constitutional text explicitly defines North Korean territory and identifies South Korea as a separate, foreign entity, warning against any infringement on its sovereignty.
• Expert Perspective: Rachel Minyoung Lee (Stimson Center) notes that this confirms the "two-states policy" first announced by Kim in December 2023, signaling that this policy is unlikely to be reversed during his leadership.

2. Historical Context and the Korean Split

The division of the peninsula is rooted in the post-WWII power vacuum following Japan's surrender in 1945.

• The Split: The Soviet Union occupied the northern half, while the United States occupied the southern half. By 1948, two distinct governments were established: a communist regime in the North and a democratic government in the South.
• The War: In 1950, Kim Il-sung invaded the South with Soviet and Chinese backing. The conflict resulted in a fragile armistice rather than a permanent peace treaty, maintaining a state of technical war that persists today.

3. Nuclear Posture and Diplomatic Outlook

North Korea’s nuclear arsenal is now explicitly integrated into its hostile posture toward the South.

• Strategic Threat: Kim Jong-un has publicly threatened the use of nuclear weapons against South Korea if the North perceives a threat to its security.
• Diplomatic Engagement:
  • U.S. and West: Engagement is currently viewed as unlikely given the current rhetoric.
  • Alliances: North Korea is actively strengthening ties with Russia and seeking to restore or improve relations with China and former Soviet-bloc nations (e.g., Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia).
• Comparison to East Germany: While often compared to the German reunification model, experts argue this is misleading. The geopolitical contexts are vastly different, and unlike the German experience, the division on the Korean peninsula appears to be hardening rather than moving toward resolution.

4. Future Risks and Escalation Factors

The potential for future engagement remains low, with the focus shifting toward managing regional tensions.

• Economic Incentives: While engagement is currently off the table, the expert suggests that a future shift could only occur if North Korea perceives significant economic benefits from interacting with the South.
• Flashpoints: The Northern Limit Line (NLL) in the Yellow Sea remains the most critical area for potential military escalation.
• Domestic Influence: Kim Jong-un retains the ability to escalate tensions at will, often influenced by North Korea’s internal domestic situation or external geopolitical pressures.

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The constitutional removal of reunification goals marks a definitive end to the "one nation" narrative that governed inter-Korean relations for decades. By codifying South Korea as a "most hostile state," Pyongyang has fundamentally altered the diplomatic landscape, making future reconciliation significantly more difficult. The situation is characterized by a hardening of borders, an increased reliance on nuclear deterrence, and a strategic pivot toward Russia and other non-Western allies. Observers should monitor the Northern Limit Line as the primary indicator of potential kinetic conflict in the near term.