Why Iceland's lava is so hard to control - Arianna Soldati

Key Concepts

• Magma vs. Lava: Magma is molten rock beneath the Earth's surface; lava is molten rock that has breached the surface.
• Lava Flow Dynamics: Characterized by extreme temperatures (approx. 1,200°C) and high density.
• Solidification Point: Lava becomes solid/still at approximately 600°C.
• Flow Velocity: Typically moves at less than 1 km/h, allowing for strategic intervention.
• Mitigation Strategies: Bombing (historical), water cooling (active), and earthen barriers (structural).

---

1. The Challenge of Lava Mitigation

Lava presents a unique engineering challenge due to its extreme heat (1,200°C) and density. Because it is as heavy as rock, it is nearly unstoppable once in motion. However, two factors make mitigation possible:

• Cooling Threshold: Lava solidifies at 600°C, a process that occurs relatively quickly if the supply of new material is cut off.
• Manageable Speed: With flow rates generally under 1 km/h, authorities have a window of time to implement defensive measures.

2. Historical and Experimental Strategies

The "Bombing" Strategy (1935 Mauna Loa Eruption)

Thomas Jaggar, the first Director of the Hawaii Volcano Observatory, attempted to disrupt lava flows by dropping 20 bombs via the US Army Air Corps. While the lava stopped six days later, modern volcanologists dismiss this as a coincidence. The consensus is that the bombs merely created temporary craters that were quickly refilled by the liquid lava.

Water Cooling (1973 Eldfell Eruption)

In a highly coordinated effort to save Heimaey Harbor, the Icelandic government pumped 6 million cubic meters of seawater onto the lava.

• Methodology: 75 workers operated in 24-hour shifts, spraying active fronts for roughly a full day each.
• Outcome: The harbor was saved, though this method is limited by the necessity of proximity to a massive water source.

3. Structural Defenses: Earthen Barriers

Earthen barriers are currently the most effective method for diverting lava away from populated areas.

• Material: Constructed using sand, dirt, or volcanic gravel.
• Case Study: Mount Etna (1983): Workers utilized 750,000 cubic meters of material (25,000 truckloads) to build four massive barriers.
• Case Study: Grindavik (2023): Following the December 2023 eruption, authorities constructed 25-meter-high barriers.
  • Iterative Process: Because lava raises the ground level as it accumulates, these barriers must be heightened between successive eruptions. This allows for proactive defense rather than reactive, last-minute construction.

4. Scientific Outlook and Synthesis

The primary goal for current volcanology is to improve predictive modeling regarding:

1. Eruption Points: Where the fissure will open.
2. Flow Direction: The path the lava will take.
3. Volume: The total amount of material an eruption will produce.

Conclusion: While lava remains an "awe-inspiring" and destructive force, the combination of slow flow rates and proven engineering techniques—specifically the use of massive earthen barriers—provides a viable framework for protecting communities. The shift toward building and maintaining permanent, scalable defenses between eruptions represents the most effective modern approach to volcanic risk management.