What the escalating conflict means for the Middle East and beyond | Berlin Briefing Podcast

Key Concepts

• Operation Epic Fury: The US-led military offensive against Iran.
• Interim Leadership Council (Iran): The newly formed council assuming control after the deaths of key Iranian leaders.
• Hezbollah: Lebanese militant group exchanging fire with Israel.
• Aramco: Saudi Arabian oil company targeted in attacks.
• E3: Britain, France, and Germany – considering defensive measures.
• International Law: The legal framework governing relations between states, debated in the context of the strikes against Iran.
• Regime Change: Potential for the overthrow of the Iranian government.
• Escalation: The widening of the conflict to include more actors and regions.

---

The Widening Conflict in the Middle East: A Berlin Briefing Analysis

Introduction

The broadcast details the rapidly escalating conflict in the Middle East following a preemptive strike by Israel and the United States against Iran, codenamed “Operation Epic Fury.” The conflict is spreading, with attacks reported in Cyprus (a British RAF base), Bahrain, Dubai, and Kuwait, alongside increased hostilities between Hezbollah in Lebanon and Israel. The discussion centers on the immediate consequences, potential future developments, and the implications for international law and regional stability.

1. Operation Epic Fury and Initial Strikes

US President Donald Trump announced “Operation Epic Fury,” described as “one of the largest, most complex, most overwhelming military offensives the world has ever seen.” The initial strikes targeted Iran, resulting in the deaths of numerous top leaders, prompting the formation of an “Interim Leadership Council” led by Ali Larijani. Larijani stated Iran’s intention to defend itself against the US, signaling a continued resistance. The attacks extended beyond military installations, impacting civilian targets in Dubai, raising concerns about the scope and nature of the offensive.

2. On-the-Ground Situation in Iran

Nilofa Gulani, reporting from DW’s Persian service, described a chaotic situation within Iran. While some Iranians expressed relief at the death of “the great dictator of Tehran” (presumably referencing a key leader), widespread fear and panic prevail. Strikes are occurring across the country, particularly in Tehran, impacting hospitals and schools. Gulani emphasized the distinction between the Iranian regime and its people, highlighting that ordinary citizens are bearing the brunt of the conflict, especially given Iran’s existing economic difficulties and weakened infrastructure. She noted reports of citizens preparing for prolonged disruption, with limited supplies of food and water. Gulani also suggested the possibility of a coalition forming against Iran, potentially targeting its energy infrastructure, representing a “worst-case scenario” for the Iranian population.

3. Regional Spread and Hezbollah’s Involvement

Richard Walker, DW’s chief international editor, highlighted the spreading nature of the conflict. Hezbollah in Lebanon has begun firing rockets into northern Israel, prompting a strong Israeli response. This exchange of fire signifies a dangerous escalation, potentially drawing in additional actors and expanding the geographical scope of the conflict. Walker noted Iran’s attempt to project an image of a structured transition of power following the leadership losses, but questioned the regime’s ability to maintain control and prevent internal factionalism.

4. International Law and European Response

The discussion addressed the legality of the US and Israeli strikes under international law. Walker stated that the strikes are “not lawful” as they were not a defensive act responding to an imminent threat. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz acknowledged the “dilemma” surrounding international law, appearing to offer a degree of leeway to the US and Israel. The E3 (Britain, France, and Germany) are considering defensive measures, with Britain already involved in intercepting rockets. Walker warned that this stance could open the door for criticism from Russia and China, accusing Europe of double standards, particularly given its strong condemnation of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. He raised the question of whether exceptions to international law are being considered.

5. Implications for the “West’s” Image in the Region

Gulani concluded by expressing concern about the impact of the escalating conflict on the image of the “West” in the Middle East. She suggested that the current situation represents a “no way back point,” and the outcome will largely depend on Iran’s response. If Iran chooses diplomacy or negotiation, the situation might de-escalate. However, if other countries join a coalition against Iran, the situation could become extremely difficult to resolve.

6. Notable Quotes

• Donald Trump: “Operation Epic Fury, one of the largest, most complex, most overwhelming military offensives the world has ever seen. Nobody's seen anything like it.”
• Nilofa Gulani: “It’s a two-day of full strike on on different places in Thrron and somebody was describing that uh she was really in panic because she also has pets. she can't leave his home and it was just all over the place was just shaking when these strikes happening.”
• Richard Walker: “This regime has been there in in power in Iran for almost 50 years… So he’s been a real consistent presence for almost four decades.”

7. Technical Terms & Concepts

• Preemptive Strike: An attack launched to prevent an anticipated attack.
• Hezbollah: A Lebanese Shia Islamist political party and militant group.
• Aramco: The Saudi Arabian national petroleum and natural gas company.
• Interim Leadership Council: A temporary governing body established in Iran following the deaths of key leaders.
• Escalation: The increase in intensity or scope of a conflict.

Conclusion

The situation in the Middle East is highly volatile and rapidly evolving. The US and Israel’s “Operation Epic Fury” has triggered a cascade of events, including attacks on multiple fronts and the formation of a new leadership structure in Iran. The legality of the strikes under international law is being questioned, and the potential for further escalation is significant. The outcome will depend on Iran’s response and the actions of other regional and international actors. The conflict poses a serious threat to regional stability and could have far-reaching consequences for the international order.