‘What’s your exit strategy to end conflict with Iran?’: Gillibrand repeatedly badgers CENTCOM

Key Concepts

• Operation Epic Fury: The recently concluded military operation against Iran.
• Simultaneity: A National Defense Strategy (NDS) concept referring to the U.S. military's ability to address aggression across multiple global theaters concurrently.
• Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC): The legal framework governing the conduct of war, specifically regarding the protection of civilians and non-combatants.
• Loitering Munitions: One-way attack drones used by the U.S. military, tested at Camp Atterbury and deployed in the Middle East.
• Defense Industrial Base (DIB): The collective industrial capacity of a nation to produce military equipment; in this context, the focus is on the degradation of Iran’s DIB.

---

1. Military Operations and Strategic Status

Admiral Cooper provided an update on the status of U.S. operations in Iran following the formal conclusion of "Operation Epic Fury."

• Current Mission: The U.S. has shifted to a "blockade mission" while maintaining readiness for a broad range of contingencies.
• Degradation of Iranian Capabilities: Admiral Cooper reported that the U.S. has significantly degraded Iran’s military, including:
  • 85% of their ballistic missile, drone, and naval defense industrial base destroyed or damaged.
  • 82% of their air defense missile systems neutralized.
  • Fractured command and control and the elimination of the majority of their space program.
• Duration and Exit Strategy: When pressed on the timeline for the conflict and the $1 billion daily cost, Admiral Cooper maintained that these are "policy decisions" made by civilian leadership, while his role is to provide options and execute directives.

2. Civilian Casualties and Accountability

A significant portion of the hearing focused on allegations regarding civilian harm.

• The Allegations: A Senator cited public reports (e.g., The New York Times) claiming 22 schools and dozens of hospitals were hit during the conflict.
• Military Response: Admiral Cooper stated there is "no indication" these claims are accurate and noted that the military has not investigated them, as they cannot corroborate the reports. He emphasized that the military follows the Law of Armed Conflict and has only one active civilian casualty investigation out of 13,629 munitions fired.
• Commitment to Oversight: The Admiral agreed to provide a formal report to the committee regarding the destruction of schools and hospitals and invited staff to visit CENTCOM in Tampa to review targeting processes.

3. Global Strategy and "Simultaneity"

The discussion touched upon the U.S. military's ability to manage global threats.

• Simultaneity: Admiral Cooper argued that the U.S. demonstrates agility by managing operations in Africa, Europe, Asia, and South America simultaneously. He noted that the rapid defeat of Iranian capabilities in 38 days proves the U.S. can project power effectively.
• Afghanistan: The Admiral confirmed that Afghanistan remains an area of concern for CENTCOM, though he declined to provide details in an open forum, citing the need for a classified setting.

4. Technological Advancements and Future Defense

• Loitering Drones: The Admiral praised the effectiveness of U.S. loitering munitions, noting that the training conducted by the Indiana National Guard at Camp Atterbury was instrumental in their successful deployment.
• Drone Warfare Evolution: Admiral Cooper debunked the notion that Iranian drones are simple, "Walmart-like" devices, characterizing them instead as highly capable systems that the U.S. has successfully countered.
• Reconstitution: To prevent Iran from rebuilding its military, the Admiral suggested a policy and legislative focus on restricting the finite number of countries that trade with Iran for military components.

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The hearing highlighted a tension between military success and civilian oversight. While Admiral Cooper presented a highly successful operational report—citing the near-total degradation of Iran’s defense industrial base and the successful application of new drone technologies—he faced intense scrutiny regarding the human cost of the conflict. The primary takeaway is that while the U.S. military has achieved its tactical objectives in a short 38-day window, the lack of a clear exit strategy and the unresolved questions regarding civilian infrastructure damage remain significant points of contention between the legislative branch and military leadership. The Admiral’s commitment to providing a detailed report on civilian impact and his emphasis on the "simultaneity" of U.S. global power projection serve as the core pillars of the current military posture.