What does the US raid in Venezuela mean for Europe? | DW News

Europe in the Age of Unpredictability: A Discussion with Omit Norrip

Key Concepts:

• Sovereignty: The principle of a state’s independent authority and right to govern itself without external interference.
• NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization): A military alliance established in 1949 based on the North Atlantic Treaty, committing member states to mutual defense.
• Rule of Law: The principle that all individuals and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that is fairly applied and enforced.
• European Strategic Autonomy: The concept of Europe developing its own independent capacity to act on the world stage, including in defense and security, without relying solely on the United States.
• Bilateral Treaties: Agreements between two countries, as opposed to multilateral treaties involving many nations.
• Revolutionary Guards (Iran): An elite military organization in Iran responsible for protecting the Islamic Republic and promoting its ideology.

I. The US Approach to International Law & Implications for Europe

The interview centers on Europe’s response to perceived disregard for international law by the United States, citing examples in Venezuela and Greenland. Omit Norrip, a German MP, argues that the US actions in Venezuela – supporting opposition to Maduro despite his formal sovereignty – demonstrate a “law of the strongest” approach, essentially a return to a “jungle” mentality in international relations. He acknowledges Maduro’s problematic governance (dictatorship and involvement in narcotics trade) but emphasizes the importance of upholding state sovereignty.

Norrip criticizes the German government’s cautious response, characterizing it as a “political complex situation” rather than a clear legal violation. He believes Germany’s reluctance to condemn the US stems from its dependence on American support for security in Europe, particularly regarding Ukraine and NATO. However, he asserts that the US administration “is not giving a damn for European interests” and that Europe must prioritize its own defense and become a “power ourselves.” He stresses that individual European nations (Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Estonia) are insufficient on their own and that a unified European approach is crucial.

II. The Greenland Case & Demonstrating European Resolve

The interview addresses the recent declaration of solidarity with Greenland and Denmark by seven European states following Donald Trump’s expressed interest in annexing Greenland. Norrip acknowledges this as a positive first step but questions its scope, advocating for a response from all 27 EU member states. He draws a parallel to the US imposition of sanctions on German activists fighting online hate speech and against EU figure Michel Barnier, highlighting a pattern of disregard for European interests.

He emphasizes the need to move beyond mere solidarity statements and actively ascertain what kind of support Denmark and Greenland require, potentially including military assistance, while explicitly dismissing the idea of war with the US as “madness.” He points out that a US attack on Greenland would effectively end NATO, as it would violate the core principle of mutual defense. Meta Frederickson, the Danish Prime Minister, is quoted as stating that a US attack on Greenland would mean the end of NATO.

III. NATO’s Future & European Defense Capabilities

Norrip firmly believes that a US attack on Greenland would dismantle NATO, as it would invalidate the alliance’s commitment to mutual defense. He explains that the foundation of NATO lies in the promise of collective assistance in the event of an attack on a member state. He highlights the existence of bilateral defense treaties between European countries (UK and France) and Germany, providing a degree of security even in a post-NATO scenario. These treaties guarantee a similar level of protection as NATO membership.

He advocates for increased investment in European defense capabilities, referencing efforts made during his time in government to strengthen the German armed forces. He stresses the importance of a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to security.

IV. Addressing the Trump Factor & Proactive European Policy

Norrip criticizes the past European approach of attempting to appease Donald Trump through gestures like gift-giving, characterizing it as ineffective. He argues for a proactive European policy, specifically citing the need for a European peace plan for Ukraine, coordinated with the Ukrainian government. He emphasizes that the Ukraine conflict is “the core issue for the future of peace order in Europe.”

He acknowledges the Greens’ attempts to prepare for a potentially hostile US administration during their time in government, but admits that some developments were unforeseeable. He stresses that thinking about Europe without NATO requires a far more comprehensive strategy than simply implementing a few measures.

V. Iran & the Need for Stronger EU Action

The discussion shifts to Iran, where Norrip notes the ongoing repression of civilians by the regime and the escalating protests fueled by economic hardship and a desire for freedom. He criticizes Trump’s mixed signals regarding Iran, noting that past US actions have left Iranians uncertain about what to expect.

He advocates for stronger EU action against Iran, specifically calling for the designation of the Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization. He notes past attempts to achieve this and expresses hope that the current German government will also support such a move. He believes increased pressure on the Iranian government is necessary.

VI. The Question of German Nuclear Weapons

Norrip addresses the question of Germany acquiring its own nuclear weapons. He points out that European security is currently underpinned by the US nuclear umbrella, but also highlights the existing nuclear capabilities of the UK and France, and the bilateral treaties Germany has with both countries guaranteeing protection. He expresses gratitude for these alliances and emphasizes the need for continued European cooperation and discussion on security matters.

Data & Statistics:

• 50,000+: The approximate number of Greenlanders who are also EU citizens due to their Danish citizenship.
• 24+: The reported number of people killed in recent protests in Iran (as of the time of the interview).

Conclusion:

The interview paints a picture of a Europe grappling with a shifting geopolitical landscape, characterized by an increasingly unpredictable United States. Omit Norrip argues that Europe must move beyond a reactive posture and develop its own independent capacity for action, prioritizing its own interests and strengthening its internal cohesion. He advocates for a proactive European foreign policy, particularly regarding Ukraine and Iran, and emphasizes the need for a unified response to perceived US overreach. The core message is a call for European strategic autonomy and a recognition that the traditional reliance on the US for security may no longer be sustainable.