'We have to remain vigilant so that this doesn't become a permanent foothold': Volpe on EV deal
By BNN Bloomberg
Key Concepts
- Tariff Reduction: The recent agreement between Canada and China reducing tariffs on Canadian canola and Chinese Electric Vehicles (EVs).
- Automotive Parts Manufacturers Association (APMA): Represents the interests of automotive parts manufacturers in Canada.
- Chinese EV Market Encroachment: The increasing presence of Chinese EV manufacturers in Western markets, often utilizing Chinese factories.
- Market Access & Affordability: The balance between opening Canadian markets to potentially cheaper EVs and protecting domestic manufacturing.
- National Security & Manufacturing Resilience: The importance of a robust domestic manufacturing sector for economic security, particularly in times of crisis.
- US Protectionist Policies: The impact of US policies under the Trump administration on Canadian EV manufacturing and trade.
- Canadian Safety Standards: The requirements for vehicles sold in Canada, impacting the immediate availability of certain Chinese EV models.
Canada-China Tariff Agreement & Impact on the Canadian Automotive Industry
This discussion centers on the recent agreement between Ottawa and Beijing to reduce tariffs, specifically focusing on the implications for the Canadian automotive industry, particularly concerning the influx of Chinese Electric Vehicles (EVs). Flavio Volpe, President of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers Association (APMA), expresses significant concerns about the tariff reduction on Chinese EVs, arguing it undermines investments made to bolster the Canadian EV manufacturing sector.
Tariff Origins & Initial Goals
Volpe explains that tariffs were initially requested and successfully implemented in Canada, the US, and Mexico approximately two years ago. This was a response to the rapid expansion of Chinese EV manufacturers – and Western manufacturers utilizing Chinese factories – into Western markets. The goal of these tariffs was to provide a period of protection for Canadian investments in the EV manufacturing sector, allowing them time to “bear fruit” and become competitive. He notes that China retaliated by targeting other sectors of the Canadian economy.
The Current Agreement & Perceived Costs
The current agreement, while restoring market access for Canadian agricultural exports (worth approximately $3 billion), is viewed by the APMA as a concession. Volpe estimates that the agreement effectively cedes 3% of the Canadian EV market, representing a value of $2-3 billion, in exchange for a potential promise of Chinese investment over three years. He emphasizes the need for vigilance to prevent this limited access from expanding into a permanent foothold, mirroring the situation in Europe where local manufacturers were negatively impacted.
Chinese EV Pricing & Availability
Currently, only Tesla vehicles manufactured in Shanghai, along with some Volvo and Polestar models, meet Transport Canada’s safety standards and are available for sale. However, other Chinese EV manufacturers, such as BYD (with models like the Seal and Dolphin), produce vehicles at the factory gate for $12,000-$15,000. Once these vehicles are modified to meet Canadian safety standards, their price will increase, but they are still expected to be competitive. Volpe suggests that consumers prioritizing affordability over supporting Canadian jobs and investment will likely be drawn to these cheaper options.
The Cap on Imports & Potential for Expansion
A cap on the number of Chinese EVs allowed into Canada was negotiated as a safeguard. While Volpe acknowledges the importance of this cap and the three-year review clause, he stresses the need for continued vigilance. He points to the potential for the agreement to be exploited to address EV affordability without considering the impact on domestic manufacturing. He questions whether a minimum price point will be established to prevent undercutting Canadian manufacturers.
Historical Parallels & the Importance of Manufacturing
Volpe draws parallels to the decline of Canadian tech companies like Nortel (lost to Huawei) and Research In Motion (BlackBerry, lost to Foxconn), warning of the “price to pay for buying things cheap.” He argues that a healthy economy requires a robust and intricate manufacturing cluster encompassing hardware, software, raw materials, skilled labor, and traditional industries. Reliance on a service or finance-based economy leaves a nation vulnerable, particularly during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic or in a heightened geopolitical environment.
Impact of US Policies & Canadian Competitiveness
The discussion highlights the detrimental impact of US policies under Donald Trump, specifically the removal of incentives for EV purchases in the US market and the imposition of tariffs on Canadian parts, raw materials, and vehicles. While an exemption for parts was negotiated, the removal of production assistance triggered clauses in Canada, hindering the development of the Canadian EV sector. Currently, Canada produces some EVs (Stellantis in Windsor) and hybrids (Toyota and Honda), but is significantly behind in overall EV manufacturing capacity.
The Broader Chinese Strategy & Global Oversupply
Volpe emphasizes that the Chinese strategy focuses on exporting 6 million vehicles globally, far exceeding Canada’s market of 2 million. He argues that the primary threat lies in the oversupply of cheap EVs, necessitating a strong defense on the EV front. He notes that China is not focused on exporting internal combustion engine vehicles, instead flooding secondary and global south markets with those.
Notable Quote
“There is a price to pay for buying things cheap.” – Flavio Volpe, President of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers Association.
Conclusion:
The agreement between Canada and China presents a complex trade-off. While it restores market access for Canadian agricultural products, it simultaneously opens the door to increased competition from Chinese EVs, potentially jeopardizing investments in the Canadian automotive manufacturing sector. The APMA advocates for continued vigilance, a clear minimum price point for imported EVs, and a sustained commitment to bolstering domestic manufacturing capabilities to ensure long-term economic resilience and national security. The situation is further complicated by US protectionist policies, which have hindered the growth of the Canadian EV industry.
Chat with this Video
AI-PoweredLoad the transcript when you're ready to chat so the initial page stays lighter.
Related Videos

The Close for Friday, June 26, 2026
BNN Bloomberg

'I will expect they will say on Wednesday they will continue to negotiate': Fagan on CUSMA
BNN Bloomberg

The Street for Monday, June 29, 2026
BNN Bloomberg

The Open for Monday, June 29, 2026
BNN Bloomberg

Morning Markets for Monday, June 29, 2026
BNN Bloomberg

Is there a Chinese cyber threat to EU solar energy? | DW News
DW News

South Korea bets big on AI with nearly a trillion dollars of investment • FRANCE 24 English
FRANCE 24 English