US wants to 'run' Venezuela - How would that work? | DW News

Venezuela: US Intervention & Geopolitical Implications

Key Concepts:

• Delta Force: US Army’s elite special operations unit specializing in hostage rescue, counter-terrorism, and direct action warfare.
• Task Force 160: US Army aviation unit specializing in nighttime operations and operating in challenging terrain.
• Chavista: Relating to or supporting the political ideology of Hugo Chávez, former President of Venezuela, characterized by socialist policies and anti-imperialism.
• Strategic Autonomy: The ability of a nation to pursue its own interests and make independent decisions without undue influence from other powers.
• Protectorate: A territory that has its own government but is under the protection of another state.
• National Security Strategy: A document outlining a nation’s goals, roles, and instruments of national power to promote its interests and protect its security.

I. The US Operation & Maduro’s Removal

The video details the recent, unexpected US military operation in Caracas, Venezuela, resulting in the capture of former President Nicolás Maduro. Maduro is currently detained in a US Drug Enforcement Administration facility in New York, facing criminal charges including weapons trafficking and narco-terrorism. The operation was executed by the US Army’s Delta Force, transported via helicopters from Task Force 160, demonstrating a high degree of precision and professionalism. Acting President Deli Rodriguez reported casualties among Venezuelan soldiers and civilians, while President Trump confirmed some US forces sustained injuries but no fatalities. Trump stated the US would “run Venezuela for the foreseeable future.”

II. Domestic Reactions within Venezuela

The intervention has elicited mixed reactions within Venezuela. Many Venezuelans in exile, particularly in Florida, celebrated Maduro’s removal, expressing hope for a return to freedom after years of authoritarian rule. One exile stated, “I saw what Donald Trump did and I feel that as a country, we are in a position where we need help from the US. This is how we can return to the freedom we had 26 years ago before Madura and his party.” However, this optimism is tempered by fear, as thousands remain detained for opposing Maduro’s government. Amnesty International has documented arbitrary arrests targeting political opponents, journalists, and human rights defenders. Some Venezuelans expressed relief and a desire to return home, having been separated from their families for years. Conversely, Maduro supporters are protesting his removal, calling for his liberation and asserting that the “revolution continues.” They believe Trump’s actions will only exacerbate the crisis. One supporter stated, “We elected Nicolola Maduro by vote. He's a president. He won the elections…the revolution continues because we're not going to allow the people who tried to kill us to come and take power in Venezuela.”

III. Geopolitical Fallout & International Responses

The US intervention has triggered significant geopolitical shockwaves. Brazil, Cuba, and Chile condemned the US action, with one commentator noting, “Venezuela today, tomorrow, could be anyone else.” Colombia has increased security along its 2,000-kilometer border with Venezuela due to heightened tensions. Russia and China have also condemned the US action, given their existing relationships with Venezuela, particularly in energy and defense. The situation is described as a “serious crisis” requiring “common sense, good judgment, and humanity.”

IV. Analysis of US Strategy & Implementation

Former US Ambassador to Panama, John Feelely, highlighted the exceptional skill of the US forces involved, contrasting their precision with the “imprecision, sort of chaos and uncertainty” surrounding the geopolitical future of Venezuela. He noted the operation’s success was the “back of the horse,” while the “political vision” for Venezuela remains unclear. John Pular Hikimovic, an associate professor at the US Naval Academy, explained that the US decision to work with Vice President Deli Rodriguez, a staunch Chavista, rather than opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, stems from a belief that Rodriguez and the Chavista high command are better positioned to maintain control and prevent widespread instability. He emphasized the US likely aims for a less costly “protectorate” or “tary regime” than a full-scale nation-building effort like Iraq. Elellena Raz Lazeru, a Venezuela expert, pointed to the US National Security Strategy’s focus on the Western Hemisphere and curbing Russian and Chinese influence as key drivers of the intervention. She noted the US is signaling a willingness to take action against countries aligned with its rivals.

V. Trump’s Motivations & Future Prospects

The analysis suggests President Trump’s motivations extend beyond humanitarian concerns and include securing access to Venezuela’s vast oil reserves and bolstering domestic political support. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s comments hinting at potential action against Cuba further suggest a broader regional strategy. Trump’s statement about “running” Venezuela raises concerns about a potential long-term US presence and the lack of a clear plan for a democratic transition. As Pular Hikimovic stated, “You don't you simply can't square these things unless you assume that the Trump administration has absolutely zero interest in a democratic future for Venezuela.” Raz Lazeru emphasized the unprecedented nature of the US action and its potential to embolden other nations to intervene in the affairs of countries perceived as threats.

VI. Notable Quotes

• Donald Trump: “Yeah, Marco [Rubio]’s been talking to their vice president um and she knows what she has to do.” (Indicating a deal with Deli Rodriguez)
• Venezuelan Exile: “I saw what Donald Trump did and I feel that as a country, we are in a position where we need help from the US. This is how we can return to the freedom we had 26 years ago before Madura and his party.” (Expressing relief and hope)
• Venezuelan Maduro Supporter: “We elected Nicolola Maduro by vote. He's a president. He won the elections…the revolution continues because we're not going to allow the people who tried to kill us to come and take power in Venezuela.” (Defending Maduro and the revolution)
• John Feelely (Former US Ambassador): “The precision, the power and the professionalism of the US military members who conducted that raid stood in high high contrast to the imprecision, sort of chaos and uncertainty that the president and secretary Rubio presented as the geopolitical future of Venezuela.” (Highlighting the contrast between military execution and political strategy)

Conclusion:

The US intervention in Venezuela represents a significant escalation of geopolitical tensions in Latin America. While celebrated by some as a liberation from authoritarian rule, it has sparked condemnation from other nations and raised concerns about the future of Venezuelan sovereignty and regional stability. The lack of a clear long-term plan, coupled with the US’s decision to work with a Chavista leader, suggests a pragmatic approach focused on securing US interests – particularly oil access and countering Russian and Chinese influence – rather than promoting a democratic transition. The situation remains highly uncertain, with the potential for further instability and conflict.