Ukraine aid: has the EU put itself in a difficult position? | DW News

EU Sanctions Against Russia Stalled: A Deep Dive into Circumvention and Internal Disagreements

Key Concepts:

• Sanctions Circumvention: The practice of bypassing imposed sanctions through various means, including third-party countries and re-exportation.
• Dual-Use Goods: Items with both civilian and military applications, making export control challenging. (e.g., microchips, Ethernet cables)
• KH-101 & Iskander: Types of Russian cruise and ballistic missiles used in attacks on Ukraine, found to contain Western components.
• Garan-2 Drone: A widely used Russian-made drone, heavily reliant on Western components for its production.
• No-Russia Clause: A contractual stipulation prohibiting the re-export of goods to Russia.
• Frozen Russian Assets: Funds belonging to the Russian state or entities, held by foreign institutions and subject to sanctions.

I. Stalled Sanctions & Internal EU Divisions

The EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell (referred to as Kaakala in the transcript), announced that EU diplomats failed to reach an agreement on a new round of sanctions against Russia. Hungary and Slovakia vetoed both the sanctions package – which would have been the 20th since the invasion of Ukraine four years ago – and a proposed €90 billion loan for Kyiv. Hungary’s condition for lifting the veto is the resumption of Russian oil flow through a pipeline on Ukrainian territory, damaged in a January Russian strike. Kyiv maintains it prioritizes repairing its own infrastructure damaged by Russian attacks before restoring oil transit. Slovakia’s Prime Minister, Robert Fico, has also threatened to halt emergency electricity supplies to Ukraine. This deadlock occurred on the eve of the fourth anniversary of the full-scale invasion and ahead of a visit by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Charles Michel to Kyiv.

II. Western Components in Russian Weaponry: A Detailed Analysis

Investigations reveal that Russian weapons systems, including cruise missiles (KH-101) and the Iskander ballistic missile system, continue to rely heavily on components manufactured in Western countries. Specifically, recovered missiles and drones have been found to contain over 100 foreign parts, primarily from the US, China, Taiwan, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Germany – despite existing embargoes.

• Garan-2 Drone: A key example highlighted is the Garan-2 drone, used extensively in attacks on Ukraine. Analysis of recovered drones shows up to 294 Western-made components, including microchips, diodes, transistors, and antennas. Russian-made parts are limited to basic components like batteries.
• Specific Components: The Iskander missile utilizes connectors and chips from German companies Harting and Infinian Technologies, with some components produced as recently as 2023/2024, indicating ongoing supply.
• Circumvention Route: Microchips are legally exported to countries like Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and China, then re-exported to Russia, circumventing direct sanctions.

III. Corporate Responses & Enforcement Challenges

European companies claim compliance with sanctions, implementing “no-Russia clauses” in distribution agreements and explicitly prohibiting onward shipment to Russia. However, tracking the final destination of components, particularly with an annual production of 30 billion chips (Infinineian Technologies), proves difficult.

• Infinineian Technologies: Asserts all sales comply with sanctions, but acknowledges tracking challenges.
• Harting Technologies: Emphasizes its products are for civilian use (e.g., PCs, control cabinets) and lack specific military applications.
• Investigative Findings: Lars Boeve, an investigative reporter, revealed that 19 companies in eight European countries have trademarks appearing in Russian weaponry, despite claiming non-delivery to Russia. These components are often routed through intermediaries in China, Hong Kong, and the UAE, including companies on sanctions lists.

IV. Calls for Stricter Sanctions & Enforcement

Vasylk, a Ukrainian official, argues that companies are not doing enough to prevent their products from reaching Russia. He advocates for tougher EU sanctions and additional embargoes to close loopholes. He acknowledges potential “collateral damage” but argues it’s justified to prevent Russia from acquiring critical components. The EU sanctions commissioner notes that export flows to neighboring countries of Russia have increased significantly, suggesting circumvention. There is also a call for increased investigation by European police services into trafficking routes.

V. Economic & Political Considerations

Benjamin Higgin, a senior economist at the Kyiv School of Economics, downplays the immediate significance of the sanctions delay, emphasizing the importance of the content of the 20th package. He notes Hungary’s history of leveraging sanctions for political and financial gain, linking the current veto to frozen EU structural funds. He believes European leaders will ultimately find a way to pass the aid package, as it is critical for Ukraine’s continued defense. He suggests potential concessions, such as the reinstatement of oil flow through the Druzhba pipeline or reassurances regarding its reopening.

The estimated cost of Ukraine’s reconstruction is nearly $600 billion, with the EU acknowledging Russia’s primary responsibility for funding it. However, the EU faces challenges in securing sufficient funds and maintaining solidarity among member states.

VI. The Broader Context & Future Outlook

Terry Schultz, reporting from the Foreign Affairs Council in Brussels, highlights the setback for EU unity and Ukraine. The EU is exploring revisiting the idea of using frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine’s reconstruction, a previous attempt blocked by Belgium. The difficulty in controlling the entire lifecycle of components, even with tightened sanctions and “no-Russia clauses,” is acknowledged. The report underscores the ongoing need for vigilance and adaptation as Russia continually finds new ways to circumvent sanctions.

Notable Quotes:

• Josep Borrell: “This is not at all the signal the European Union should be sending…especially not on this eve of the fourth anniversary of Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.”
• Daria Arabuk (Ukrainian citizen): “They must not be sold. You must not do that. It’s a business, but a business that kills people.”
• Lars Boeve (Investigative Reporter): “Without these western components it would really not be possible for Russia to produce these types of drones on such a massive scale.”
• Benjamin Higgin (Economist): “Hungary has been playing both sides since the very beginning of the of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine.”

Conclusion:

The stalled EU sanctions package and the continued presence of Western components in Russian weaponry expose critical vulnerabilities in the sanctions regime. While companies claim compliance, circumvention through third-party countries remains a significant problem. Addressing this requires stricter enforcement, expanded sanctions lists to include complicit intermediaries, and a renewed commitment to unity among EU member states. The situation underscores the complex interplay between geopolitical strategy, economic interests, and the human cost of the conflict in Ukraine.