U.S. Trade Rep. Jamieson Greer: Very concerned with Chinese non-compliance on trade agreement

CNBC TelevisionAbout 4 min readMay 30, 2025Watch original
THE SUMMARYAI-generated

Key Concepts:

  • National Emergency Declaration & Tariffs
  • Trade Act of 1974
  • Trade Deficit (US)
  • Chinese Compliance/Non-Compliance with Trade Agreements
  • Countermeasures (Trade)
  • Negotiations (Trade)
  • Section 301 Tariffs

1. Court Ruling on Tariffs and Emergency Relief

  • The U.S. Trade Representative, Ambassador Jamison Greer, believes the administration has a "very strong case" regarding the president's authority to impose tariffs under a national emergency declaration.
  • He states that Congress delegated the power to the president to act during a national emergency, and the administration has declared one and taken action.
  • A stay has been issued by the circuit court.
  • Ambassador Greer notes that other countries involved in trade negotiations are treating the court ruling as a "bump in the road" and not a fundamental change.
  • He asserts that even if the case goes against the administration, "we have other tools as well."

2. Impact of Tariffs on Negotiations

  • Ambassador Greer indicates that foreign officials have expressed their intention to continue negotiating with the U.S. despite the legal challenges to the tariffs.
  • He says that these officials understand the litigation process and the U.S. policy direction.

3. Legal Tools and Trade Deficit

  • The administration's trade team has been considering various legal tools for years, including the Trade Act of 1974, which allows for tariffs with a 150-day review period.
  • The primary concern is the "enormous trade deficit," which worsened during the Biden years.
  • Ambassador Greer argues that the global trading system needs fixing to prevent further deterioration.

4. Justification for Emergency Declaration

  • Ambassador Greer defends the use of a national emergency declaration, stating that the trade deficit has "exploded by 40% over the past four years," increasing from $850 billion to $1.2 trillion.
  • He also points to a worsening net international investment position, reaching -$26 trillion, indicating significant foreign claims on U.S. assets.
  • He argues that this situation is "dangerous."

5. President Trump's Statement on China

  • President Trump posted on Truth Social that high tariffs had made it "virtually impossible for China to trade in the United States marketplace."
  • He claimed that this situation led to factory closures and civil unrest in China.
  • Trump stated that he made a deal with China to "save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation."
  • However, he alleges that China has "totally violated its agreement with us."

6. Chinese Compliance and Countermeasures

  • Ambassador Greer confirms that the administration has been monitoring Chinese compliance with the trade agreement and is "very concerned" with their non-compliance.
  • He states that the U.S. has fulfilled its obligations, but China is "slow rolling their compliance," which is "completely unacceptable."
  • When the U.S. imposed reciprocal tariffs, China retaliated not only with tariffs but also with countermeasures, including blacklisting U.S. companies and restricting the flow of rare earth magnets.
  • While China removed the tariffs as agreed in Geneva, they have been slow to remove some of the countermeasures.

7. Negotiations with China

  • Treasury Secretary indicated that talks with China had "completely stalled" and that a phone call between President Trump and President Xi would be necessary to get things back on track.
  • Ambassador Greer confirms that this is accurate and that such a call is in the works.
  • He notes that conversations continue at lower levels, but the issues require leader-to-leader understanding.
  • He criticizes China's history of non-compliance with trade agreements, despite efforts by the U.S. and other Western countries to accommodate them.

8. Specific Examples of Chinese Non-Compliance

  • China was the only country to retaliate when the U.S. imposed reciprocal tariffs.
  • China's countermeasures included blacklisting U.S. companies and restricting the flow of rare earth magnets.
  • While China removed the tariffs as agreed in Geneva, they have been slow to remove some of the countermeasures.

9. Synthesis/Conclusion

The Trump administration is facing legal challenges to its tariff policies but remains confident in its legal position. The administration views the trade deficit as a national emergency and is committed to using various legal tools to address it. Negotiations with China are ongoing but have stalled, with concerns about Chinese non-compliance with trade agreements. The administration is considering all options, including a potential phone call between President Trump and President Xi, to address the situation.

AI summaries can miss context or contain errors. Check important details against the original video.

MAKE IT YOURS

Read. Remember. Reuse.

Free tools

Go a little deeper.

Have a question about this video? Load its transcript to open the video chat.