Trump eyes Greenland after Venezuela: "It would be a catastrophe for the West" | The Daily T

Venezuela, Iran, Greenland & Trump’s Foreign Policy: An Analysis with John Bolton

Key Concepts:

• Transactional Diplomacy: Trump’s foreign policy approach characterized by individual deals and immediate gains, often disregarding long-term strategic implications.
• Troika of Tyranny: Bolton’s term for the alignment of Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua under authoritarian regimes.
• Quid Pro Quo: A reciprocal exchange of favors, specifically the speculation of a deal between the US and Russia regarding influence in Venezuela and Ukraine.
• Chavistas: Supporters of Hugo Chavez’s political ideology and the current Maduro regime in Venezuela.
• Noriega Surrender Anniversary: The significance of January 3rd as the anniversary of Manuel Noriega’s surrender to US forces, potentially influencing the timing of Maduro’s arrest.
• Kasemsulammani Strike: The successful US strike against Qassem Soleimani, head of the Iranian Quds Force, also occurring on January 3rd.

---

I. Maduro’s Arrest & Internal Dynamics

The interview centers on the recent arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, with Ambassador John Bolton offering insights into the planning and motivations behind the operation. Bolton suggests the option of addressing the Maduro regime was present throughout Trump’s presidency, with the Pentagon requiring months of planning before execution. He posits the timing of the arrest – January 3rd – was deliberate, coinciding with the anniversaries of both Manuel Noriega’s surrender in Panama (1990) and the assassination of Qassem Soleimani (2020).

Bolton believes Trump’s primary frustration with Maduro stemmed from a perceived inability to achieve desired outcomes, leading to a shift towards more forceful action. However, he emphasizes the challenge of dismantling the entire regime, comprised of “hardcore chavistas” dedicated to maintaining power, not a suppressed democratic movement. He acknowledges speculation of an internally supported coup but expresses doubt, suggesting the regime might be willing to sacrifice Maduro to preserve itself. Crucially, Bolton highlights the involvement of external actors – Russia, China, Cuba, and Iran – all with significant interests in maintaining the Maduro regime, potentially even agreeing to his removal if it secures their broader objectives. He notes the use of military force to apprehend Maduro suggests a lack of full cooperation from within the regime.

II. Motivations Beyond Drugs: Oil, Geopolitics & Regional Security

Addressing Trump’s stated justification of drug trafficking as the primary reason for intervention, Bolton dismisses this as an oversimplification. He argues Trump conflates issues – drugs, terrorism, immigration – and overlooks the core strategic concerns. Bolton identifies the real motivations as:

• Russia’s foothold in the Western Hemisphere: Venezuela serves as a safer base of operations for Russia than Cuba.
• Cuba’s survival: The Cuban regime fears its own collapse if Maduro falls.
• China’s oil interests: Venezuela possesses the largest proven oil reserves globally, with China currently purchasing approximately 80% of its exports.
• Iran’s regional activities: Venezuela hosts the largest Iranian embassy worldwide, facilitating Hezbollah operations and laundering sanctioned Iranian funds, and possessing significant uranium reserves.

Bolton stresses these external factors pose direct threats to US security, justifying intervention, particularly given the invitation from the legitimate opposition leaders, Juan Guaido (previously) and Mundo Gonzalez (currently), for US assistance.

III. Russia, Ukraine & the Potential for Quid Pro Quo

The discussion turns to the possibility of a quid pro quo agreement between the US and Russia, where Russia would be allowed to operate freely in Ukraine in exchange for tacit approval of US actions in Venezuela. Bolton dismisses the idea that Trump engages in complex geopolitical strategizing, characterizing his approach as “one move at a time” and “disorderly.” He points to the conflicting statements regarding US intentions in Venezuela – Trump’s claim of “running” the country versus Marco Rubio’s assertion of merely “influencing” policy – as evidence of this lack of strategic coherence.

Bolton warns that Putin and Xi Jinping might exploit this perceived disorder as a precedent for their own actions in Ukraine and Taiwan, arguing that the situations are fundamentally different and cannot be equated. He criticizes Trump’s disregard for the meaning of words and consistent application of principles.

IV. Trump’s Foreign Policy Style & Domestic Reactions

Bolton characterizes Trump’s foreign policy as driven by “one off transactional decisions,” devoid of consistent philosophy or doctrine. He acknowledges potential backlash from Trump’s political base, particularly those who may be surprised by the intervention in Venezuela. He suggests the initial political benefit of removing a “bad guy” could be short-lived.

He notes the internal divisions within the Republican party, highlighting the contrasting views of JD Vance (isolationist) and Marco Rubio (interventionist). Bolton points to Trump’s personnel choices for the operation – including Rubio, Pete Hegseth, and military leaders – while conspicuously excluding Vance as indicative of these tensions.

V. The Greenland Question & “Trolling the World”

Regarding Trump’s renewed interest in Greenland, Bolton asserts Trump is “trolling the world,” employing outrageous demands to ultimately secure partial concessions. He warns that a US invasion of Greenland would be “the end of the NATO alliance” and a “catastrophe for the Western world.”

VI. Western Response & Economic Realities

Bolton criticizes the circumspection of Western leaders, like the UK’s Keir Starmer, in responding to Maduro’s removal, noting that even Congress was not consulted. He dismisses the notion that increased Venezuelan oil production will significantly lower gas prices, arguing that American oil companies are unlikely to invest in Venezuela’s dilapidated infrastructure given the political instability. He predicts that any benefits from increased oil exports will accrue to the next US president, not Trump.

Notable Quotes:

• “Honestly, if the United States under Trump invaded Greenland, it would be the end of the NATO alliance. It would be a catastrophe for the Western world.” – John Bolton
• “Remember how he negotiates? He makes the most incredible, outrageous demand he can think of. People pull their hair out in despair. How are we ever going to respond to that? He gets 50%, 30% of what he asked for and it's a big success.” – John Bolton (describing Trump’s negotiation style)
• “He’s not playing 3D chess. He’s playing one move at a time.” – John Bolton (on Trump’s strategic thinking)

Conclusion:

The interview paints a critical picture of Trump’s foreign policy, characterized by impulsivity, transactionalism, and a disregard for established norms and alliances. Bolton suggests that while Trump may achieve short-term gains through unconventional tactics, his actions risk destabilizing the international order and creating opportunities for adversaries like Russia and China. The situation in Venezuela, according to Bolton, is complex and fraught with challenges, and the long-term consequences of the intervention remain uncertain. The interview underscores the unpredictable nature of Trump’s decision-making and the potential for unintended consequences on the global stage.