This 'makes you wonder' how many people came in under Biden admin: Border Patrol official

Key Concepts:

• Terrorist Designations (Foreign Terrorist Organizations)
• Ports of Entry
• Database Checks
• "Open Borders Campaign"
• ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement)
• Border Patrol
• National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC)
• Lone Wolf Attacks
• Domestic Terrorism
• International Terror
• Narco-Terrorism
• ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria)
• Civil Rights Violations

Summary:

This transcript features a discussion with Paul Perez, President of the National Border Patrol Council, regarding national security concerns at the U.S. border, particularly in light of the Biden administration's policies.

Terrorist Designations and Border Encounters

• The Trump administration designated Tren de Aragua and MS-13 as Foreign Terrorist Organizations.
• However, Perez highlights that under the Biden administration, over 1900 known or suspected terrorists have been encountered. This figure is presented as a concern, especially in the post-9/11 era.
• Perez attributes the apprehension of most of these individuals to the "vigilance of our agents and officers at the ports of entry and in between the ports of industry, the green shirts."
• He emphasizes the capability of Customs officers to conduct thorough database checks to identify individuals.
• A key concern raised is the unknown number of individuals who may have entered the country during what Perez terms the Biden administration's "open borders campaign."

Credibility of Democrats and National Security Risks

• Former FBI officials and law enforcement sources are cited as stating that Democrats, including those from the Biden and Obama administrations, lack credibility on border security.
• The argument is made that attacking ICE and Border Patrol puts Americans at risk.
• The National Counterterrorism Center has identified over 35,000 known or suspected terrorists, with sources suggesting this is "just the tip of the iceberg."

Fear of Large-Scale Attacks

• Sources are expressing fear of attacks similar to the Moscow concert hall incident, where 140 people were killed by individuals with backpacks.
• Another concerning example mentioned is an American woman trained by ISIS to infiltrate a college campus with explosive-laden backpacks.
• These concerns are used to argue that the "far left Squad" and Democrats are "off the mark" and not adequately securing the nation's borders.

Law Enforcement and Intelligence Community Concerns

• Perez states that those in the law enforcement and intelligence communities are deeply concerned about these threats, which "keeps us up at night."
• These concerns encompass various forms of terrorism:
  • Lone Wolf Attacks: Individuals acting alone.
  • Domestic Terrorism: Acts of terrorism perpetrated by individuals or groups within a country against their own citizens.
  • International Terror: Terrorism originating from foreign entities.
  • Narco-Terrorism: Terrorism linked to drug trafficking.
• The primary goal is to prevent the injury of American citizens and residents.
• Perez acknowledges the significant possibility of terrorists entering the country due to the Biden administration's policies.
• He reiterates the commitment of law enforcement to continue their duties despite these challenges.

Ethical and Competency Arguments

• The discussion frames the situation as "immoral and incompetent" to label border security efforts as "fascism."
• The focus is shifted to the human cost, emphasizing that the issue is about "people," "lives," and preventing "the worst form of civil rights violation, getting murdered."

Conclusion

The core takeaway from the transcript is a strong assertion from Paul Perez and cited sources that the current border policies under the Biden administration are creating significant national security vulnerabilities. The apprehension of a substantial number of known or suspected terrorists at the border, coupled with intelligence indicating a broader threat landscape, fuels concerns about potential large-scale attacks. The speakers argue that criticism of border enforcement agencies by some Democrats undermines national security and demonstrates a lack of understanding and credibility on the issue. The emphasis is on the dedication of border patrol and law enforcement agents working to mitigate these risks, despite what they perceive as detrimental policy decisions.