This 7-Min Video Will Show You Why Closing Half Your Trade Early Usually Costs You Money.

Key Concepts

• Legging In/Out: The practice of managing the individual legs of a multi-leg option strategy (e.g., an iron condor or strangle) independently, rather than closing the entire position as a single unit.
• On as a Package, Off as a Package: A trading philosophy advocating that multi-leg strategies should be entered and exited simultaneously to maintain the intended risk profile.
• Delta: A measure of an option's sensitivity to changes in the price of the underlying asset.
• Strangle: An options strategy involving the sale of an out-of-the-money put and an out-of-the-money call.
• Straddle: An options strategy involving the sale of an at-the-money put and an at-the-money call.
• Management Parameters: The specific rules (e.g., profit targets, time-based exits) used to govern when a trade is adjusted or closed.

---

1. Research Findings on "Legging Out"

The research team conducted a study to determine if "legging out"—exiting the profitable side of a trade (e.g., a 50% profit target on one leg of a strangle) while leaving the other side open—improves performance.

• Performance Results: The analysis concluded that legging out does not improve performance. In fact, managing the entire position as a single unit generally outperformed the legging approach over the long term.
• Delta Comparisons:
  • 16 Delta Strangles: The study found little difference between legging out and managing the position as a whole; the results were statistically similar ("six of one, half dozen of another").
  • 30 Delta Strangles: Increasing the delta began to show that legging out worsened performance compared to managing the whole position.
  • 50 Delta (Straddles): When managing straddles, the study used a 25% profit target. The data showed that managing the whole position at 25% resulted in a better average P&L and a higher profitability percentage compared to legging out.

2. Key Arguments and Perspectives

• The "Package" Philosophy: The speakers argue that "on as a package, off as a package" is the superior approach. Legging out increases portfolio complexity and forces the trader to take on unnecessary directional risk.
• Opportunity Cost: When a trader legs out of a profitable side, they often leave significant premium on the table. If the market continues to move against the remaining leg, the trader loses the benefit of the credit that could have been used to offset the loss.
• Action vs. Inaction: The speakers emphasize that while they do not support "legging out" as a passive profit-taking strategy, they do support active management. If a trade is tested, they advocate for rolling the untested side to collect more credit or converting the position into a spread to mitigate risk, rather than simply closing one side and waiting.

3. Practical Applications and Management Strategies

The speakers provided specific examples of how to manage tested positions without simply "legging out":

• Rolling the Untested Side: If a call side is tested, a trader can buy back the naked put and sell a new put at a higher strike (or further out in time) to collect additional premium.
• Converting to Spreads: Instead of just closing a leg, a trader can turn the untested side into a spread. This allows the trader to collect more premium while defining risk, providing a buffer if the market reverses.
• Covered Calls: The speakers noted that a covered call is syntactically similar to a short put. They advise against closing the short call at 50% profit if the underlying stock position needs the premium to offset potential losses. Instead, they suggest rolling the call out in time to continue collecting premium.

4. Notable Quotes

• "Legging in and out increases the complexity of a portfolio management and requires traders to take on more directional risk."
• "Legging in and out has not demonstrated any advantages compared to our traditional management style."
• "If one side's getting tested, you want more credit or more premium from the other side, from the untested side."

5. Synthesis and Conclusion

The primary takeaway from the research is that "legging out" of multi-leg option positions is an ineffective management strategy that fails to outperform the traditional method of closing the entire position at once. While traders often feel the urge to "ping pong" out of profitable legs, the data suggests this adds complexity and reduces overall profitability. Effective management should focus on active adjustments—such as rolling untested sides or converting to spreads—to collect additional premium and manage risk, rather than simply exiting legs independently.