'The U.S. needs this trade agreement, as does Mexico, just as much as Canada does': Nott

Key Concepts

• CUSMA/USMCA: The Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement, the current trilateral trade deal governing North American commerce.
• Rules of Origin: Regulations determining the percentage of a product's components that must originate within a specific region to qualify for tariff-free trade.
• Trade Promotion Authority (TPA): A legislative procedure that allows the U.S. President to negotiate trade agreements that Congress can approve or reject, but not amend.
• Zombie Agreement: A scenario where a trade deal remains technically active but requires annual renegotiations, creating long-term business uncertainty.

---

1. The Strategic Landscape of CUSMA Negotiations

Joy Nott, a partner at KPMG, emphasizes that Canada must approach the upcoming CUSMA review by highlighting its inherent value to the North American economy. She argues against the notion of "aggressive" posturing, suggesting instead a realistic approach: the U.S. and Mexico are as dependent on the agreement as Canada is. The fact that Canada has successfully secured tariff exemptions over the past 15 months serves as evidence of the agreement's mutual importance.

2. Automotive Sector Challenges

The automotive industry remains a central pillar of the negotiations. Nott highlights potential shifts in "Rules of Origin" that could significantly impact the sector:

• Proposed Content Requirements: Rumors suggest a potential increase in North American content requirements for vehicles from 75% to 82%.
• The "U.S. Kicker": A critical, more restrictive proposal suggests that 50% of a vehicle's total value must originate specifically from the United States.
• Strategic Perspective: While these numbers are high, Nott notes that they represent a "path" forward, which is preferable to the previous stance that Canada had nothing to offer the U.S. market.

3. Infrastructure as a Bargaining Chip

The delay in the opening of the Gordie Howe International Bridge is identified as a tactical bargaining chip. Nott asserts that the current U.S. administration utilizes a specific negotiation style designed to maintain the "upper hand." Consequently, infrastructure projects, rules of origin, and the timing of formal discussions are all being leveraged as tools to exert pressure on Canada.

4. Presidential Authority and Legal Uncertainty

A significant point of contention is whether the U.S. President can unilaterally withdraw from CUSMA.

• The Legal Ambiguity: Unlike the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which was in the negotiation phase when the U.S. withdrew, CUSMA is codified as U.S. law.
• Congressional Role: Because the agreement was passed into law via Congressional approval, legal scholars debate whether the executive branch has the authority to scrap it without legislative involvement.
• Litigation Risk: Nott suggests that any attempt at unilateral withdrawal would almost certainly trigger immediate and extensive litigation within the U.S. court system.

5. Future Outlook: The "Zombie Agreement"

Canada’s official position, as articulated by Dominic LeBlanc, is to seek a 16-year renewal of the agreement to ensure stability. However, Nott views this as an optimistic outcome. She warns of a more likely "zombie agreement" scenario:

• Annual Renegotiation: The deal remains in effect, but parties are forced to return to the negotiating table annually.
• Business Impact: This creates a state of perpetual uncertainty, making it difficult for Canadian, U.S., and Mexican companies to engage in long-term capital planning or supply chain investment.

Synthesis

The CUSMA review process is characterized by high-stakes brinkmanship. While Canada aims for long-term stability, the current political climate suggests a period of prolonged, iterative negotiations. The primary risk for the North American business community is not necessarily the total collapse of the agreement, but rather the "zombie" state of constant renegotiation, which undermines the predictability required for cross-border trade and investment.