The Dangers Created by Tesla’s Door Design

Bloomberg TechnologyAbout 3 min readSep 11, 2025Watch original
THE SUMMARYAI-generated

Tesla Door Design & Emergency Egress: A Bloomberg Investigation

Key Concepts:

  • Low Voltage Battery: Powers doors, windows, and touchscreen in Tesla vehicles.
  • Mechanical Override: Manual release mechanism for doors in case of power loss.
  • Egress: The act of exiting a vehicle, especially in emergency situations.
  • Crash Testing Regulations: Current US regulations primarily focus on crashworthiness, not post-crash egress.

The Problem: Complicated Emergency Egress in Teslas

Tesla's design features, specifically battery-powered door handles and mechanical releases, can complicate emergency situations after crashes. When a Tesla loses power (due to low voltage battery failure or crash damage), the doors lock, making egress difficult.

Tesla's Dual Battery System

Tesla vehicles have two battery systems:

  1. Main Battery: Powers the car and determines its range.
  2. Low Voltage Battery: (Typically 12V, 48V in Cybertruck) Powers doors, windows, and the touchscreen.

Failure of the low voltage battery or crash damage can disable the electronic door releases.

The Mechanical Override: A Hidden Solution

All Tesla vehicles have a mechanical override to open the doors manually when power is lost. However, locating and using this override can be challenging, especially in a stressful emergency situation.

  • Front Doors: Typically a latch.
  • Rear Doors: Requires removing a pad to access a wire mechanism.

Case Studies & Real-World Examples

Bloomberg News investigated several crashes where the mechanical override played a role, including a crash in Virginia where bystanders were unable to open the doors from the outside after a crash. They had to break a window and use hydraulic cutters to free the occupants. The report highlights the difficulty in gathering data from fatal crashes, as victims cannot be interviewed.

Regulatory Gaps & Crash Testing Limitations

Current US crash testing regulations primarily focus on how well a vehicle performs in a crash (e.g., rollover). Tesla vehicles often receive high safety ratings (e.g., five stars across all categories). However, these tests do not adequately assess post-crash egress:

  • How easy is it to exit the vehicle after a crash?
  • How easy is it for first responders to access the vehicle?

The increasing use of electric door handles and strong glass in modern vehicles further complicates egress.

Cybertruck Design Considerations

The Cybertruck's flat door design necessitates a different mechanical override mechanism in the rear doors. The limited space inside the door panel makes electronic releases more difficult to implement. Child safety latches also influence the design, preventing children from easily opening the doors from the backseat.

Tesla's Response & Regulatory Engagement

Tesla has not responded to Bloomberg's reporting, despite being given the opportunity to comment. Regulatory agencies have also not engaged significantly with the reporting.

Notable Quotes

  • "[O]ur crash testing doesn't look at what happens to a human being after a crash. How easy is it to get out of the vehicle? How easy is it for first responders to get in?"

Synthesis/Conclusion

The Bloomberg investigation reveals a potential safety issue with Tesla's door design and the accessibility of mechanical overrides in emergency situations. Current crash testing regulations do not adequately address post-crash egress, highlighting a gap in safety standards. The report emphasizes the need for greater awareness of the mechanical override locations and potential improvements in vehicle design to facilitate easier egress after a crash.

AI summaries can miss context or contain errors. Check important details against the original video.

MAKE IT YOURS

Read. Remember. Reuse.

Free tools

Go a little deeper.

Have a question about this video? Load its transcript to open the video chat.