'Tariffs are a joke compared to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz': Gertken

Key Concepts

• Strategic Ambiguity: The U.S. policy of intentionally remaining vague about whether it would militarily defend Taiwan in the event of an attack.
• Strait of Hormuz Blockade: The ongoing disruption of oil shipping lanes by Iran, which serves as a geopolitical pressure point.
• Export Control Regime: U.S. restrictions on the sale of advanced technology, specifically AI-capable chips (e.g., Nvidia), to China.
• Indigenous Alternatives: China’s strategy of developing domestic technology to bypass U.S. export restrictions.
• Trade Truce: The current state of U.S.-China economic relations, characterized by a pause in aggressive tariff escalation to avoid market volatility.
• Rare Earth Elements (REEs): Critical minerals where China holds significant supply chain leverage, which they have used to counter U.S. trade pressure.

---

1. Geopolitical Standoffs: Iran and Taiwan

The meeting between the U.S. President and the Chinese leader yielded no major breakthroughs.

• Iran: China remains a bystander. While the U.S. maintains a blockade on Iranian oil, China’s leverage is limited by the fact that its oil imports are already being disrupted. China is effectively demanding the U.S. lift the blockade, while the U.S. refuses to do so until Iran agrees to nuclear program concessions.
• Taiwan: The U.S. maintains its policy of "strategic ambiguity." Regarding a potential $24 billion arms package, Matt Gertken notes that presidents often delay such sales for political convenience. He suggests that a "lame duck" period (e.g., December 2028) would be the most strategic time for the President to authorize such a sale to provide "plausible deniability" regarding direct involvement.

2. Market Impacts and Oil Prices

Oil prices rose following the meeting, driven by market miscalculations:

• Market Misreading: Investors incorrectly assumed China would intervene "muscularly" to force Iran to reopen shipping lanes.
• Iranian Strategy: Iran is leveraging the U.S. President’s concern over midterm elections. By maintaining a ceasefire while causing agitation in the oil markets, Iran believes it can avoid direct military conflict while continuing to withhold its highly enriched uranium stockpiles.
• Blockade Enforcement: The U.S. is hesitant to aggressively enforce the blockade against Chinese oil tankers, as doing so could be perceived as an act of war.

3. Tech Policy and Corporate Influence

The presence of major tech executives (e.g., from Tesla and Apple) on the trip to China highlights the tension between national security and market access.

• Corporate Pressure: Tech leaders argue that if the U.S. prevents China from purchasing advanced goods, American companies will lose market share, and China will simply accelerate the development of "indigenous alternatives."
• Policy Shift: The President has signaled a willingness to ease export controls on specific AI chips (Nvidia) to appease these corporate interests, though Gertken warns that the long-term regime will remain restrictive.

4. The Evolution of Tariff Policy

Tariffs have taken a backseat to more pressing geopolitical issues like the Strait of Hormuz.

• The "Trade Truce": The President previously backpedaled on tariffs to avoid triggering a bear market or recession. This led to the current trade truce established in Geneva and reaffirmed in Beijing.
• Institutional Constraints: The U.S. Supreme Court and other domestic institutions have placed limitations on the President’s unilateral authority to impose tariffs.
• Future Outlook: While tariffs are currently quiet, Gertken predicts they will return after the midterm elections. China remains a primary target for future tariffs, justified by the U.S. through the lenses of intellectual property (IP) theft and national security.

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The U.S.-China relationship is currently defined by a "trade truce" and a mutual desire to avoid economic catastrophe, yet both nations remain locked in a high-stakes standoff. The U.S. is struggling to balance its desire to contain Iran’s nuclear ambitions and China’s technological rise with the reality that aggressive actions—such as total blockades or broad tariffs—risk domestic economic instability and potential military escalation. The primary takeaway is that while the rhetoric has softened, the underlying structural conflicts regarding technology, energy security, and regional influence remain unresolved, with the U.S. likely to resume a more aggressive tariff posture against China once domestic political pressures (midterms) subside.