Skyrocketing Valuation Increases Appetite for Private Investments

The Evolving Landscape of Private Markets & Future IPOs

Key Concepts:

• Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX): US legislation increasing corporate responsibility and financial disclosures, making public listing more complex.
• JOBS Act: US legislation easing regulations for emerging growth companies, facilitating staying private longer.
• Growth Equity: Investment in mature, established private companies with high growth potential.
• Secondary Market Transactions: Trading of existing shares in private companies, providing liquidity for investors and employees.
• SPVs (Special Purpose Vehicles): Investment structures allowing access to private company shares.
• Valuation: The process of determining the economic worth of a company.
• Long-Termism: An investment philosophy focused on sustained growth over extended periods.
• Crossover Investors: Investors who participate in both public and private markets, often anchoring future IPOs.

---

1. The Structural Shift Towards Prolonged Private Status

The speaker outlines a fundamental change in how companies are capitalizing themselves, moving away from traditional early public offerings. This shift is driven by a combination of regulatory factors and a cultural evolution within companies. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act increased the burdens of being a public company, while the JOBS Act simultaneously lowered barriers to remaining private. However, a key driver is the realization by founders that sustained, focused business building is often better achieved outside the scrutiny of public markets. This has resulted in “an irreversible change in companies staying private for longer,” leading to the emergence of “exceptional world class businesses of real scale in the private markets.”

2. The 2026 IPO Wave & Potential Scale

The discussion highlights 2026 as a potentially significant year for IPOs, specifically mentioning SpaceX, Anthropic, and Urbanized. SpaceX, if it lists 10% of itself at its current valuation, could represent a $90 billion IPO – dwarfing the historical record of Alibaba’s $25 billion IPO in 2014. This scale presents “uncharted waters” for the IPO market. The speaker emphasizes the question of when these companies will choose to go public, given the clear appetite from public market investors. The core concern revolves around price and valuation – what levels will public investors accept? And, crucially, how will the public markets digest such massive offerings?

3. Baillie Gifford’s Integrated Approach to Public & Private Equity

Baillie Gifford maintains a tightly integrated public and private growth equity strategy. When a portfolio company transitions to the public market, the public investment teams independently assess its suitability for their clients. This allows Baillie Gifford to potentially increase its ownership stake and maintain a long-term investment horizon. The firm’s commitment to “long-termism” is underscored, with 118 years of growth equity experience and 14 years specifically in large-growth-stage private businesses. The speaker notes that these private investments haven’t been entirely illiquid, with a developing secondary market providing transparency and opportunities for liquidity.

4. Navigating Secondary Markets & Balancing Ownership

The discussion addresses criticism from Cyber Capital Management regarding Baillie Gifford’s role as both a private and public investor. The speaker clarifies that the initial wave of companies staying private longer (up to 2015) was primarily fueled by primary capital injections. However, the recent emergence of mega-cap private companies is linked to increased secondary market transactions, allowing companies to delay IPOs. Baillie Gifford selectively trims private market positions to realize gains, recycle capital, or distribute returns to partners.

5. Influence & Operational Involvement with Portfolio Companies

The speaker clarifies Baillie Gifford’s approach to influencing portfolio companies like SpaceX. Their focus is on providing value specifically tailored to growth-stage companies, rather than engaging in traditional venture capital activities. This includes assisting with governance frameworks and preparing companies for the transition to independent boards and public market scrutiny. This preparation is a multi-year process, starting well before a potential IPO.

6. Assessing Profitability & Competitive Dynamics – The Anthropic Example

Regarding companies like Anthropic, the speaker emphasizes the importance of evaluating not just revenue potential, but also the ability to translate revenue into profit and achieve a strong return on equity. This involves understanding pricing power dynamics, margin structures, and capital intensity. The firm focuses on identifying “exceptional companies” even within competitive markets.

7. The Changing Investor Landscape & Valuation Considerations

The speaker acknowledges the increasing participation of retail investors (through SPVs) and Gulf Sovereign Wealth Funds in private markets. However, they maintain that private markets remain selective, with companies prioritizing “value-added partners” who offer long-term support. A key point is that private markets are not “democratic,” and companies retain control over their investor base. The comparison between Tesla’s $2 billion IPO in 2010 and SpaceX’s current $800 billion valuation illustrates the significant growth occurring within the private markets, growth that public markets historically captured. This underscores the demand for access to these private companies.

Conclusion:

The conversation paints a picture of a fundamentally altered IPO landscape. Companies are staying private longer, achieving significant scale, and creating a potential wave of massive IPOs in the coming years, particularly around 2026. The key challenges lie in valuation, market digestion, and navigating the evolving investor base. Firms like Baillie Gifford are adapting by integrating their public and private equity strategies, focusing on long-term value creation, and actively preparing portfolio companies for the rigors of the public markets. The shift represents a significant opportunity for investors, but also demands a nuanced understanding of the dynamics at play in this rapidly evolving environment.