Security in the Kremlin is tighter than ever, according to internal reports | DW News

Key Concepts

• Authoritarian Stress Test: The use of elections (like the parliamentary elections) to gauge regime stability and manage public perception.
• Proactive Loyalty: The Kremlin’s current strategy of purging officials to ensure subordinates actively defend the regime rather than remaining neutral.
• Economic Brittleness: The state of the Russian economy, which remains functional but has become narrower, less developed, and more dependent on resource exports due to sanctions.
• Existential Isolation: Putin’s strategy of cutting off Russian citizens from European cultural and economic ties to force a choice between emigration or total commitment to the current regime.
• The "Oligarch" Misnomer: The argument that wealthy Russian elites have lost their political autonomy and are now merely beneficiaries of state-sanctioned corruption rather than power brokers.

---

1. Kremlin Security and Internal Stability

The video addresses recent intelligence reports suggesting Vladimir Putin has intensified his personal security measures. Sam Green, a professor of Russian politics, notes that this is not a new development but an escalation of long-standing paranoia.

• Security Measures: Putin’s isolation is evidenced by his avoidance of public appearances and the use of extreme physical distancing (e.g., the "long table" meetings).
• The Prigozhin Precedent: The June 2023 Wagner Group mutiny led by Yevgeny Prigozhin serves as a critical case study. The primary threat was not the rebellion itself, but the fact that the rest of the security apparatus "sat on the fence," waiting to see who would win before committing their loyalty. This has triggered ongoing purges within the Ministry of Defense to enforce "proactive loyalty."

2. The Role of Elections and Political Pressure

Despite being an authoritarian state, Russia uses elections as a "stress test."

• Putin vs. United Russia: Putin maintains a high approval rating (70–75%), while the ruling party, United Russia, is less popular. Putin intentionally keeps the party at a distance so that it absorbs the blame for economic failures and domestic grievances, protecting his own image.
• The Duma’s Function: The regime requires a large majority in the Duma to maintain the current structure of power, making elections a necessary, albeit controlled, exercise.

3. Economic Reality and Sanctions

Contrary to Western narratives of imminent collapse, the Russian economy has proven resilient through adaptation.

• Resource Exports: Russia continues to export natural resources to markets in India and China. This prevents a total fiscal collapse and keeps global resource prices manageable for the West.
• Structural Costs: While not at a crisis point like Iran or Venezuela, the economy is "threadbare." It suffers from high costs of capital, lack of development, and reduced investment. The system is more brittle than it was four years ago.

4. The Status of the Elites and Ordinary Citizens

• The "Oligarchs": These individuals have lost their political influence. They are now dependent on the state for wealth through defense contracts and sanctions evasion. They remain in the system because they fear that a collapse of the current regime would lead to public retribution against them.
• The Social Contract: The traditional view that Putin provides prosperity in exchange for political silence is inaccurate. Instead, the arrangement is one of mutual distance: the state leaves citizens alone to manage their own lives, and citizens, recognizing the state’s corruption, keep their distance from politics.

5. Geopolitical Consequences

• NATO Integration: A key argument presented is that Russia’s invasion has backfired strategically. While Ukraine is not in NATO, the war has led to deep security integration between Ukraine and Europe, with European leaders now viewing Ukrainian security as essential to their own.
• Isolation as a Tool: By cutting off access to European lifestyles and cultural spaces, Putin has removed the "escape mechanisms" that younger, educated Russians used to maintain autonomy. This forces them to either leave the country or accept that their future is tied to the current regime.

Synthesis and Conclusion

The consensus provided by Sam Green is that while the Kremlin faces genuine challenges, there is no evidence of an imminent collapse. The system is designed to survive by monopolizing power and preventing the emergence of any credible alternative. Putin’s grip remains firm because he has successfully eliminated the possibility of a "successor" and has forced the elite into a position where they have no viable path outside of his continued rule. As Green concludes, the situation is "stable until it isn't," and any sudden change would likely be something that neither the Kremlin nor outside observers can currently predict.