‘Scandal’: Labor does a ‘backflip’ on aged care reforms

Key Concepts

• Aged Care Reform: Recent legislative changes to the Australian aged care system, specifically regarding funding for clinical care and home support.
• Administrative Review Tribunal (AAT): An independent body for reviewing government decisions, now accessible for certain aged care assessment disputes.
• GST Expansion: The reported application of Goods and Services Tax to optional aged care living fees.
• Private Health Insurance (PHI) Rebate: Government subsidies for PHI premiums, currently tiered by age (65–69 and 70+).
• Cost of Living Crisis: The financial strain on older Australians, particularly those living in poverty or on full pensions.

---

1. Aged Care Funding and Policy Backflip

The federal government has reversed a controversial policy implemented on November 1 that required older Australians to pay up to $50 per hour for basic home support services, such as showering assistance.

• The Change: The government has reclassified these essential services as "clinical care," which will now be fully funded by the state.
• Impact: This move addresses a significant public backlash, as the previous policy forced vulnerable individuals to choose between essential hygiene and financial stability.

2. Assessment and Appeal Processes

Navigating the aged care system is described as complex and difficult for elderly citizens and their families. Corey Erlam (COTA) outlined the formal process for challenging an unsatisfactory assessment:

1. Initial Review: Request a reconsideration directly from the original assessor.
2. Internal Escalation: If the initial review is unsatisfactory, the matter is escalated to the assessor’s supervisor.
3. Independent Review: The Department can conduct an independent review.
4. Administrative Review Tribunal (AAT): Under the new act, certain government decisions can now be appealed to the AAT, providing a new layer of legal recourse that did not exist previously.

3. GST on Aged Care Fees

A recent report in The Australian revealed that the government has expanded the GST to cover "optional aged care living fees."

• Financial Impact: This is projected to raise approximately $250 million annually.
• Concerns: COTA highlighted that one in four Australians over the age of 50 currently live in poverty. A 10% increase in costs for these services poses a significant threat to the financial security of low-income seniors. The lack of public consultation regarding this change remains a point of contention.

4. Changes to Private Health Insurance (PHI) Rebates

The government announced a reduction in the tiered PHI rebates for older Australians.

• Current Structure: A base rebate of ~24% exists for all, with an additional 4% for those aged 65–69 and an additional 8% for those over 70.
• The Change: The government is removing the age-based "extra" rebates, meaning everyone will eventually receive the same base rate.
• Financial Burden: Estimates suggest this will cost the average person approximately $1 per day.
• Behavioral Impact: While the government predicts only 44,000 people (0.4%) will drop their insurance, COTA warns of a "hidden" consequence: seniors may retain their insurance as a safety net for emergencies (e.g., a broken hip) but will be unable to afford the co-payments required to utilize the services for day-to-day health needs.

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The current state of Australian aged care is characterized by "teething problems" following recent legislative overhauls. While the government has made a positive correction by fully funding essential clinical care, other measures—such as the expansion of GST on living fees and the reduction of PHI rebates—are creating new financial pressures. COTA emphasizes that for a demographic where a significant portion lives in poverty, these incremental costs are not merely administrative adjustments but significant barriers to health and dignity. The system remains difficult to navigate, and the long-term impact of these policy shifts on the health-seeking behavior of older Australians remains a critical concern.