‘Rooting for Iran to win’: Kellyanne Conway SLAMS Dem rhetoric

Key Concepts

• Sanctuary Cities: Jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities (ICE).
• ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement): The federal agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws.
• Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS): A term used to describe intense, irrational opposition to Donald Trump that critics argue blinds the Democratic Party to political reality.
• 80/20 Issues: Political issues where a vast majority (80%) of the public agrees, and the minority position (20%) is considered extreme or out of touch.
• Democratic Socialists: A faction within the Democratic Party that advocates for more radical progressive policies, which critics argue is alienating moderate voters.

---

1. Sanctuary Cities and Public Safety

The discussion highlights the impact of sanctuary city policies in New York, citing specific crime statistics attributed to the city’s own data. Since January 20, the city has reportedly released nearly 7,000 criminals. The breakdown of these offenses includes:

• 29 Homicides
• 2,500 Assaults
• 199 Burglaries
• 305 Robberies
• 392 Drug offenses
• 300 Weapons offenses
• 207 Sexual predatory offenses

Kellyanne Conway argues that the Democratic Party’s support for open borders and the defunding of ICE is creating a dangerous environment. She cites a specific incident in Bushwick, Brooklyn, where 200 people protested against ICE agents who were attempting to apprehend an illegal migrant with prior drug and assault charges who had attempted to run over federal agents with his vehicle.

2. Infrastructure and Policy Criticisms

• Rikers Island: The speakers criticize the plan to shut down the Rikers Island jail complex, arguing it will reduce jail capacity by 75%, leaving no space for criminals and exacerbating public safety issues.
• Funding Priorities: Conway notes that some sanctuary states have diverted funding away from FEMA and the U.S. Coast Guard to avoid supporting ICE operations, characterizing this as a hallmark of the "modern Democratic Party."

3. The "Far-Left Takeover" of the Democratic Party

The conversation shifts to the internal state of the Democratic Party, referencing Barney Frank, a former progressive icon.

• Barney Frank’s Critique: Despite his history as a progressive leader, Frank is reportedly writing a book warning that the "far-left takeover" and "Trump Derangement Syndrome" are pushing the party toward positions that are "politically unacceptable."
• Cultural Disconnect: Conway mentions that figures like Rahm Emanuel have warned Democrats that they are "losing the culture wars" by remaining on the wrong side of 80/20 issues, such as voter ID laws and border security.

4. Foreign Policy and National Security

The participants discuss the Democratic Party's stance on Iran, labeling it the "pro-Iran party."

• Argument: Conway and Larry argue that some Democrats appear to be "rooting for the U.S. to fail" in international conflicts.
• Evidence: They cite a Harvard-Harris poll showing that the American public overwhelmingly opposes Iran obtaining nuclear weapons, contrasting this with what they perceive as a weak or complicit stance from the current Democratic leadership.

5. Polling Data and Political Trends

The speakers emphasize the validity of the Harvard-Harris poll, noting that it utilized a balanced 50/50 split between Republicans and Democrats, unlike other polls that they claim oversample Democrats. Key findings mentioned include:

• Two-thirds of Americans believe Democrats oppose voter ID laws.
• Public sentiment is strongly against Iran acquiring nuclear capabilities.
• The "generic Democrat" is increasingly viewed as an "age-of-sanctuary" extremist rather than a traditional moderate.

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The discussion concludes that the Democratic Party is undergoing a radical shift driven by the far-left, which is causing them to lose touch with the American electorate on critical issues like public safety, border security, and national defense. By prioritizing sanctuary policies and ideological purity over pragmatic governance, the speakers argue that the party is alienating moderate voters and creating a "politically unacceptable" environment that threatens both domestic safety and national security.