Protests erupt across Colombia, in support of Venezuela against US actions

Key Concepts

• US-Colombia Relations: Historical and current cooperation, particularly regarding drug trafficking and counterterrorism.
• US-Venezuela Relations: Shift in policy under Trump, focusing on oil access following Maduro’s diminished power.
• Colombian Concerns: Fear of US intervention and potential destabilization.
• Venezuelan Political Landscape: Continued presence of Maduro’s regime despite leadership change, and the challenges facing a transition to democracy.
• Resource Exploitation: Concerns about the US potentially replacing Russia and China in exploiting Venezuelan oil resources without benefiting the Venezuelan people.
• Regional Geopolitics: The evolving power dynamics between the US, China, and Russia in Latin America.

---

Colombia’s Concerns Regarding US Actions in Venezuela

The recent American operation in Venezuela has sparked significant worry in neighboring Colombia, specifically regarding potential plans President Trump may have for their country. This anxiety is compounded by an escalating war of words between President Trump and Colombian President Gustavo Petro following developments in Venezuela. Protests have erupted across Colombia, with citizens voicing opposition to any form of US intervention, chanting “Stay out of our country” and expressing solidarity with the Venezuelan people (“estamos contigo”). A demonstration in Bolivar Plaza, Bogotá, numbering in the thousands, exemplified this sentiment.

US-Colombia Cooperation & Perceived US Motivations

Despite Colombia being a larger source of drugs entering the US than Venezuela, the historical cooperation between the two governments in combating drug trafficking and addressing security concerns is considered vital. However, President Trump’s rhetoric is causing alarm. He characterized both Venezuela and Colombia as “very sick,” accusing the Colombian president of being involved in cocaine production and sales to the United States. This language fuels skepticism about US motivations, with some, like Davidid (a Colombian commentator), believing the US views Latin America primarily as a source of resources.

Davidid frames the situation within a broader geopolitical context, suggesting China is challenging US dominance, mirroring Cold War dynamics. He states, “China now is on the top. They are changing the rules. This is all like cold war somehow and USA is watching is witnessing how they are losing this power.” This perspective highlights the concern that US actions are driven by a desire to maintain regional influence rather than genuine concern for democratic values or the well-being of the Venezuelan people.

Petro’s Response & Ongoing Security Cooperation

President Petro directly responded to Trump’s accusations on X (formerly Twitter), dismissing them as the product of a “scenile brain” and asserting that Trump labels those unwilling to provide him with coal or oil as “naroterrorists.” Despite the public dispute, the report emphasizes the ongoing and crucial security cooperation between the US and Colombia, particularly in intelligence and military matters, deemed essential for US national interests – specifically, stemming the flow of drugs and assisting Colombia with counterterrorism efforts.

The Situation in Venezuela: Regime Continuity & Oil Deal

In Venezuela, the report details the continued presence of Maduro’s regime, even with a change in leadership to Deli Rodriguez. While Maduro is no longer the public face of the government, his security forces, including the collectivos (described as unofficial secret police), maintain a strong presence, conducting searches and intimidating citizens to suppress any celebration of Maduro’s diminished power. The regime is now forging a new economic partnership with the United States. President Trump announced that Venezuelan authorities will be supplying the US with 30 to 50 million barrels of sanctioned oil.

This development raises concerns about whether replacing Russia and China as primary buyers of Venezuelan oil will genuinely address the country’s systemic corruption and improve the lives of ordinary Venezuelans. The report questions if this is simply a continuation of resource exploitation under a different benefactor.

Exiled Venezuelans’ Perspective

The report features Alessandra, a Venezuelan exile who fled when Maduro came to power, now assisting other exiles in finding new lives. She expresses skepticism about Trump’s motives, believing the focus is on oil rather than freedom. Her emotional response, and the introduction of her daughter Alyssa, underscores the personal stakes involved and the hope for a future Venezuela free from Maduro’s influence. However, Alessandra acknowledges the significant challenge that Maduro’s allies remain firmly in power, hindering a complete transition. She states, through tears, that her hope is for her daughter to grow up in a world without Maduro, but recognizes the persistence of his network.

Logical Connections & Synthesis

The report establishes a clear connection between US actions in Venezuela and the resulting anxieties in Colombia. Trump’s rhetoric and the oil deal are presented as potentially destabilizing factors, raising concerns about US intentions and the future of regional geopolitics. The contrasting perspectives – Colombian concerns about intervention, Petro’s defiant response, and the cautious hope of Venezuelan exiles – highlight the complexity of the situation.

The central takeaway is that while the US has secured access to Venezuelan oil, the long-term consequences for both Venezuela and Colombia remain uncertain. The report suggests that simply replacing one set of external actors with another does not guarantee positive change and may even exacerbate existing problems of corruption and instability. The continued presence of Maduro’s allies and the suppression of dissent in Venezuela further complicate the prospects for a genuine democratic transition.