Polls close in Myanmar's junta-run elections | DW News

Myanmar’s 2023 General Election: A Detailed Analysis

Key Concepts:

• Hunta (or Junta): The military government of Myanmar.
• USDP (Union Solidarity and Development Party): The pro-military political party in Myanmar.
• NLD (National League for Democracy): The political party led by Aung San Suu Kyi, which won the 2020 election but was subsequently overthrown in the 2021 coup.
• Asean (Association of Southeast Asian Nations): A regional intergovernmental organization of Southeast Asian countries.
• Five-Point Consensus: A plan agreed upon by ASEAN to resolve the crisis in Myanmar, which the military has largely ignored.
• Sham Election/Fake Election: An election that is not free, fair, or representative of the will of the people.
• Targeted Sanctions: Sanctions specifically aimed at individuals or entities associated with the military regime.
• ICJ (International Court of Justice): The principal judicial organ of the United Nations.

I. The Context: Civil War and Disputed Legitimacy

The recent general election in Myanmar, concluded after a month-long process, is widely viewed as illegitimate due to the ongoing civil war and the military’s control over the electoral process. Voting did not occur in areas controlled by rebel groups, and reports indicate widespread intimidation and coercion of voters. Yanghee Lee, former UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, stated unequivocally that a meaningful election is “absolutely not” possible in a country at war, emphasizing the military’s control over less than 40% of the territory and its use of collective punishment to ensure voter turnout. She characterized the election not merely as a “sham” but a “fake election,” noting that even in areas where polling stations were ostensibly open, access was restricted and many residents had already been displaced by military airstrikes.

II. Evidence of a Rigged Election

Multiple sources confirm the election’s lack of credibility. Lee highlighted that even in townships where the military claimed to be holding polls, control was often absent, rendering voting impossible. Furthermore, the military’s claim that the election is a step towards restoring power to the people is dismissed as a facade, with Lee pointing to 70 years of military rule in Myanmar as evidence of their true intentions. Elaine Pearson, Asia Director for Human Rights Watch, corroborated this, stating that the military is not in control of half the country and that approximately 22,000 political prisoners are currently detained. The NLD, the party that won the 2020 election, was barred from participating, and its leaders, including Aung San Suu Kyi, remain imprisoned. Pearson also noted recent incidents of violence, including an airstrike on a tea shop that killed many civilians, and attacks on hospitals and schools, demonstrating the ongoing brutality of the regime.

III. International Response and Potential Actions

The international community is deeply divided on the election’s legitimacy. Western governments have largely condemned it as a sham, and Malaysia, the previous ASEAN chair, has refused to send observers or recognize the results. However, countries like Russia, China, Belarus, Cambodia, and Vietnam did send observers, raising concerns about their impartiality. Both Lee and Pearson stressed the need for a strong international response. Lee called for increased and targeted sanctions against the military junta, a complete cessation of diplomatic and economic engagement, and urged countries to refrain from recognizing the fraudulent regime. She issued a stark warning to those who accept the results: “Shame on you.” Pearson echoed the call for pressure on the junta to end the violence and release political prisoners.

IV. Legal and Constitutional Frameworks Enabling Military Control

Pearson explained that Myanmar’s constitution reserves 25% of parliamentary seats for active members of the military, ensuring continued military control even if the USDP wins a majority. Furthermore, a new law criminalizes criticism of the junta and the election process, leading to the prosecution of over 400 individuals for actions as simple as liking a Facebook post criticizing the military. One individual received a seven-year sentence for a single Facebook post. This legal framework effectively silences dissent and entrenches military rule under a civilian guise.

V. Future Outlook and the Role of ASEAN

The outlook for Myanmar remains bleak. Pearson anticipates no significant change in the near future, with intensifying fighting and ethnic armed groups controlling large swathes of the country. She emphasized the need for stronger leadership from ASEAN, particularly from the Philippines, the current chair. She highlighted the importance of upholding the Five-Point Consensus, which the military initially agreed to but subsequently disregarded. Pearson also called for accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity, referencing the case at the International Court of Justice regarding the military’s alleged acts of genocide against the Rohingya population. While the ICJ case won’t lead to immediate criminal prosecutions, it is a crucial step towards establishing accountability.

VI. Data and Statistics

• 22,000: Approximate number of political prisoners currently detained in Myanmar.
• 25%: Percentage of parliamentary seats reserved for active members of the military under Myanmar’s constitution.
• 400+: Number of individuals prosecuted under a law criminalizing criticism of the junta and the election process.
• 52 million: The population of Myanmar suffering daily from airstrikes and lacking humanitarian aid.

Notable Quotes:

• Yanghee Lee: “It’s not just a country of war. It’s that the military has less than 40% of control over the territory and it’s terrorizing the people.”
• Yanghee Lee: “It’s a fake election and the winner is a fraud that comes out of the fake election.”
• Elaine Pearson: “This is really a desperate bid by the military to get some form of international legitimacy by holding these polls.”
• Elaine Pearson: “This is not really about giving power back to the people. This is about entrenching military rule with a civilian face.”

Conclusion:

Myanmar’s 2023 general election is widely considered a fraudulent attempt by the military junta to legitimize its rule amidst a brutal civil war. The election lacks any semblance of fairness or credibility, and the international community is deeply divided on its recognition. A strong and unified international response, including targeted sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and a commitment to accountability for human rights abuses, is crucial to pressure the junta to end the violence, release political prisoners, and ultimately restore democratic governance in Myanmar. The situation remains dire, and without significant intervention, the suffering of the Myanmar people is likely to continue.