Nvidia, AMD sell-off makes 'absolutely no sense,' says Patrick Moorhead
By CNBC Television
Key Concepts
- AI Narrative: The prevailing story and optimism surrounding Artificial Intelligence, driving significant investment and demand in the tech sector.
- China Policy Headlines: News and developments related to China's governmental policies, particularly those impacting trade, technology, and international relations.
- Open AI Driven Demand: The surge in demand for high-performance computing hardware, especially GPUs, fueled by the rapid advancements and adoption of AI technologies, exemplified by companies like OpenAI.
- Left Brain Emotional Reaction: A term used to describe an irrational, fear-driven, or knee-jerk market response, as opposed to a logical, analytical assessment.
- Hyperscalers: Large-scale cloud service providers (e.g., AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) that require immense computing power and advanced chips to operate their data centers.
- Leading Edge Chips: The most advanced and powerful semiconductor chips, crucial for high-performance computing, AI, and other cutting-edge technologies.
- Investment Cycle: A period characterized by significant capital expenditure, innovation, and growth within a specific industry or sector.
Impact of China Policy on Tech Stocks
Patrick Moorhead of Moor Insights and Strategy argues that the market's reaction to China policy headlines concerning companies like Nvidia and AMD is a "complete overreaction." He notes that Nvidia was specifically impacted by China-related news in August and September but subsequently recovered due to the strong "Open AI driven demand."
As evidence of this overreaction, Moorhead states that Nvidia has proactively "zeroed out all revenue for China going forward" in all their forecasts. This suggests Nvidia has already de-risked its financial outlook concerning China. He draws a critical distinction between companies like Apple, which perform "most of the manufacturing in China and a little bit in India," and chip companies like Nvidia and AMD. For Nvidia and AMD, concerns about China manufacturing exposure "make absolutely no sense," implying their core value and supply chain for leading-edge chips are less tied to China's manufacturing base. He characterizes the market's fear as a "left brain emotional reaction."
Unprecedented Investment Cycle and Market Dynamics
Moorhead observes an unprecedented "massive investment cycle" in the tech sector, particularly driven by AI. He states, "I've never seen anything like this," referring to the current scale of investment, which he describes as far surpassing previous technology infrastructure cycles. He suggests that the significant "run up of so many stocks in the ecosystem," including "cloud service providers, chip companies and everybody in between," led to an overheated market. Consequently, "the market was looking for any reason, any reason to sell off," and China policy headlines provided that trigger.
Geopolitical Risk Assessment
Moorhead emphasizes that while China manufactures consumer electronics like "smartphones and PCs," the true geopolitical risk for the tech industry lies with Taiwan. He states that a "true trade war with Taiwan" would be "very, very difficult" because "most of the leading edge chips that are used in hyperscalers are all made in Taiwan." This highlights Taiwan's indispensable role in the global supply chain for advanced semiconductors, distinguishing it from China's role. The discussion implies that while "shutdown" risks exist, they are less impactful for the core tech sector (especially leading-edge chips) when related to China compared to a potential conflict involving Taiwan. He notes that for tech, the China-related risk "doesn't make sense" from a "right brain" (logical) perspective.
Conclusion/Main Takeaways
Patrick Moorhead concludes that the market's negative reaction to China policy headlines regarding chip companies like Nvidia and AMD is largely an overreaction. This is supported by Nvidia's proactive de-risking of its China revenue and the fundamental difference in supply chain exposure compared to manufacturing-heavy companies like Apple. He posits that the market was seeking a reason for a sell-off amidst an unprecedented AI-driven investment boom. The more significant geopolitical risk for the supply of "leading edge chips" lies with Taiwan, not China, due to Taiwan's critical role in manufacturing components for "hyperscalers." The current AI-driven investment cycle is unparalleled in its scale and intensity.
Chat with this Video
AI-PoweredLoad the transcript when you're ready to chat so the initial page stays lighter.
Related Videos

99% Follow Goals, Only 1% Do this
Him-eesh Madaan

Why Does This Guy Appear In Kids Videos?
sphynx

NVIDIA Monopoly is DEAD | OPEN-SOURCE Chips Are HERE!
Hefty LLM

TIC en las Organizaciones - Electiva Complementaria II Unisimon
Julieth Güell S

¿Trabajas en Oficina? EL ERROR que comete el 99% con Julieta Manzano | Martha Debayle
Martha Debayle

How East India Company Captured India | Nitish Rajput | Hindi
Nitish Rajput @

How to Tame Your Advice Monster | Michael Bungay Stanier | TED
TED