Non-geopolitical factors have led to 'less than ideal' security responses in Asia Pacific: IISS

CNAAbout 3 min readMay 28, 2025Watch original
THE SUMMARYAI-generated

Key Concepts

  • Non-geopolitical factors influencing security policies
  • Threat assessment biases (downplaying or overstating)
  • Domestic politics shaping international security (e.g., potential second Trump term)
  • US-China competition and its regional impact
  • Polarization in Northeast Asia (China-North Korea-Russia ties)
  • Diversification of partnerships (Japan's strategy)
  • Like-minded countries' concerns over China's actions

Non-Geopolitical Factors Influencing Security

The International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS) report highlights that security policies and decisions in the Asia-Pacific are often influenced by overlooked non-geopolitical and non-security factors. These factors range from global market and economic forces to the operational histories of militaries and domestic political leadership.

Biased Threat Assessments

The report argues that these non-geopolitical factors can lead to biased threat assessments. These assessments may either downplay or overstate threats, resulting in flawed defense capability development plans and narrow defense partnership choices.

Domestic Politics: The Trump Example

The report cites the potential second term of U.S. President Donald Trump as an example of how domestic politics can shape international security. It suggests that a second Trump term could redefine major questions related to the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the role of the Quad, and the American approach to Taiwan.

US-China Competition

The report notes a shift in U.S. priorities towards Asia, particularly in its competition with China. While this is welcomed by countries like the Philippines and Japan, who are on the "sharp end" of China's behavior, it raises concerns for others in the region. The potential for growing U.S.-China tensions has significant consequences for these countries. The competition is no longer solely military but encompasses economic, technological, and financial aspects, making it increasingly complex.

Northeast Asia Polarization

The report warns that Northeast Asia could become more polarized due to growing ties between China, North Korea, and Russia. Although they have not formed a formal trilateral alliance, this development has influenced Japan's strategic outlook.

Japan's Diversification Strategy

In response to the changing security landscape, Japan is diversifying its partnerships and building a multi-layered network beyond its alliance with the U.S. This includes improving ties with South Korea and increasing collaboration with the Philippines and Australia.

Concerns of Like-Minded Countries

Like-minded countries share concerns over issues such as the surge of "gray zone" activities in the South China Sea and the Chinese military's deployments to the Pacific Islands.

Conclusion

The IISS report emphasizes the importance of considering non-geopolitical factors when assessing security risks and formulating defense strategies in the Asia-Pacific. The region faces complex challenges stemming from U.S.-China competition, the rise of China-North Korea-Russia ties, and various domestic political factors. Countries are adapting by diversifying partnerships and addressing specific threats posed by China's actions.

AI summaries can miss context or contain errors. Check important details against the original video.

Go a little deeper.

Have a question about this video? Load its transcript to open the video chat.