No breakthrough in high-level peace talks in Moscow over Ukraine war

By ABC News

Share:

Key Concepts

  • Peace Deal Brokerage: The process of mediating an agreement to end the conflict in Ukraine.
  • Divergent Positions: The significant differences in demands and expectations between Russia and Ukraine.
  • Kremlin Strategy: Russia's diplomatic and rhetorical tactics, including attempts to create divisions among Western allies.
  • Durable Settlement: A long-lasting peace agreement that addresses underlying security concerns and prevents future conflict.
  • Territorial Questions: Disputes over the control and sovereignty of Ukrainian territory.
  • Security Guarantees: Assurances provided to Ukraine regarding its future safety and defense.
  • Negotiating Flexibility: The willingness of a party to adjust its demands or positions during talks.

US-Russia Peace Talks in Moscow: Challenges and Outcomes

Former US Ambassador to Ukraine, Steven Piper, discussed the significant challenges facing US Special Envoy Steve Wickoff and President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner in their efforts to broker a peace deal to end the war in Ukraine. A meeting in Moscow between these US officials and Russian President Vladimir Putin lasted nearly five hours.

Lack of Compromise and Divergent Positions: According to Yuri Ujukov, Putin's foreign policy adviser who was present at the meeting, "no compromise reached." Ujukov, who previously served as the Russian ambassador to the United States, indicated that while "some ideas put forward by the American side were acceptable, others were not." He declined to provide specific details but confirmed that contacts would continue. Ambassador Piper highlighted that the positions of the Ukrainians and Russians remain "very far apart," and there has been "no movement in the Russian position towards compromise" in three and a half years.

Russian Strategy and Pre-Talk Rhetoric

Prior to meeting with the US officials, President Putin made threatening remarks towards Europe, stating, "Russia doesn't want a war but if Europe starts one Russia is ready." Ambassador Piper interpreted this as a "very obvious attempt by the Kremlin to drive a wedge between the United States and Europe." The Kremlin's objective, according to Piper, is to "somehow continue to string President Trump along and get him to sort of back away and not continue the kind of support that Ukraine has received from the West over the past three and a half years," contrasting this with Europe's clear commitment to continued support.

Impact of Ukrainian Negotiator's Resignation

Andre Yermach, who had been Ukraine's lead negotiator until recently, resigned after his home was searched by anti-corruption investigators. President Zelensky announced Yermach's resignation. Ambassador Piper believes this development will not "impede or even slow down the peace process." He explained that other key participants, such as the Secretary of the National Security Defense Council Umra, have been actively involved in the talks. Umra participated in a meeting with Secretary Rubio in Geneva ten days prior and also led the Ukrainian delegation that met with Secretary Rubio in Florida. Therefore, Piper concluded that the change in leadership of the Ukrainian delegation is unlikely to cause a "substantive change in Ukraine's approach."

Core Disputed Issues and Prospects for Peace

Ambassador Piper emphasized that the "big question" remains whether the five hours of talks produced any real change or indication of Russian willingness to compromise. He noted that over the last six to eight months, Ukrainians have "suggested their proposes prepared to show some flexibility," but there has been "no change whatsoever in the Russian position."

The key issues discussed, or those still "needing work" from the American proposals, are primarily:

  1. Territorial Questions: Specifically, "How much if any Russian Ukrainian territory might Russia occupy?"
  2. Security Guarantees: Ukraine's demand for a "durable" settlement, ensuring they "don't want a settlement now and then find in three or four years after Russia has rebuilt its military, they're back at war again."

Piper expressed skepticism about immediate breakthroughs, stating, "I'm dubious because I don't think Putin yet believes that he has to negotiate in a serious way." He believes Putin "continues to believe that at the end of the day he can achieve his goals on the battlefield."

Conclusion

The recent five-hour peace talks in Moscow between US envoys and Russian President Putin yielded no immediate compromise, with both sides' positions remaining "very far apart." While some American proposals were deemed acceptable by Russia, critical issues like territorial disputes and durable security guarantees for Ukraine require significant further negotiation. Russia's pre-talk rhetoric aimed to divide Western allies, while Ukraine's negotiating stance remains consistent despite a change in its lead negotiator. The former US Ambassador to Ukraine, Steven Piper, remains skeptical about a near-term breakthrough, believing that President Putin still perceives military victory as achievable, thus diminishing his incentive for serious negotiation.

Chat with this Video

AI-Powered

Load the transcript when you're ready to chat so the initial page stays lighter.

Ready to summarize another video?

Summarize YouTube Video