New report raises ALARMING questions about Biden’s auto-pen orders

By Fox Business

Presidential Autopen UseWhite House Physician InvestigationAlleged Cover-up of Cognitive DeclinePresidential Pardons
Share:

Key Concepts

  • Autopen Use: The use of an autopen by President Biden for official signings.
  • Alleged Cover-up of Mental Decline: Accusations that the Biden administration concealed the President's cognitive state.
  • Executive Action Legitimacy: Questions surrounding the validity of executive actions signed via autopen, especially in conjunction with alleged cognitive issues.
  • White House Physician's Role: Scrutiny of Dr. Kevin O'Connor for allegedly facilitating concealment by presenting incomplete medical assessments.
  • Cognitive Exams: The absence of cognitive exams in President Biden's annual medical assessments.
  • Neurologist Visits: Undisclosed visits of a neurologist to the White House.
  • Press Secretary's Role: Karine Jean-Pierre's alleged role in the cover-up by refusing to answer press questions.
  • Presidential Pardons: Examination of pardons issued by President Biden, particularly those signed via autopen and blanket future-imperfective pardons.
  • Border Policy: Criticism of the Biden administration's border policies and alleged illegal immigration numbers.
  • Economic Policies: Concerns about gas prices, grocery prices, and violent crime under the Biden administration.
  • Energy Policy: The cancellation of pipelines as a policy decision.

House Oversight Committee Report on Autopen Use and Alleged Cover-up

The House Oversight Committee has released a report investigating former President Biden's use of the autopen and an alleged cover-up of his mental decline. The committee asserts that executive actions signed via autopen should be considered illegitimate. They have recommended that the Department of Justice investigate whether Joe Biden personally authorized these actions.

Scrutiny of Biden Aides and White House Physician

Biden aides Anthony Burnell and Karine Jean-Pierre are facing significant scrutiny for their alleged involvement in this cover-up. Lawmakers have also sent a letter to the D.C. Board of Medicine requesting an investigation into former White House Physician Kevin O'Connor. The committee contends that Dr. O'Connor facilitated concealment by presenting incomplete annual exams, neglecting to conduct warranted cognitive exams, and refusing to communicate transparently about the President's medical care.

Incomplete Medical Assessments and Undisclosed Neurologist Visits

The report highlights that Dr. O'Connor's annual medical assessments are incomplete and misleading, as they do not include cognitive exams or mention a neurologist visiting the executive mansion eight times between 2023 and 2024 during the Biden presidency. Karine Jean-Pierre is accused of aiding the cover-up by refusing to answer press questions about these neurologist visits.

Report Details and Committee Chairman's Statement

This 91-page report includes a dozen transcribed interviews and numerous document requests. Committee Chairman James Comer has described this as one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history.

Legal Implications and Physician's Accountability

Former federal prosecutor Katie Czajkowski stated that significant questions remain about the legitimacy of actions taken by President Biden. While the use of the autopen is authorized, the conjunction with known cognitive issues raises serious questions about whether he personally made those decisions or if others acted on his behalf without his consent.

Waiver of Physician-Patient Privilege

Regarding legal recourse, Czajkowski explained that while physicians have certain privileges, when a physician certifies publicly inaccurate or misleading information, those privileges are waived. The medical board can investigate for licensing purposes. On the criminal side, the question is whether there is evidence of intent and knowledge to conceal or defraud the American people, a matter being deferred to the Justice Department.

Examination of Biden Administration Policies

The discussion then shifted to policies enacted during the Biden administration.

Presidential Pardons and Autopen Use

All pardons, with the exception of the pardon of Hunter Biden (which Joe Biden personally signed), were issued via autopen. The legitimacy of these autopen-signed pardons is questioned. It is noted that significant individuals, including the Vice President, have since stated that they should have questioned these actions, allowing those around the President to operate without oversight.

Border Security and Immigration

Criticism was leveled at the Biden administration's "wide open border" policy, with estimates of 10 to 20 million illegal immigrants entering the country under his watch. The uncertainty of who entered and who "got away" is a major point of contention.

Economic and Social Concerns

The transcript also touches upon concerns regarding gas prices, grocery prices, and violent crime in cities, which are described as being out of control. The speaker contrasts these issues with President Trump's statements, calling the current situation a "dark day" for the country.

Energy Policy and Pipeline Cancellations

The cancellation of pipelines is mentioned as a policy decision that was questioned at the time and is now understood to have been detrimental.

Unprecedented Blanket Future-Imperfective Pardons

The autopen issue is further complicated by the issuance of "unprecedented blanket future-imperfective pardons." The speaker questions how a person can authorize a pardon for something they are not aware of, especially if they are not cognitively able to understand such matters. The hypothetical and unknown nature of these pardons, particularly concerning Hunter Biden, is highlighted as an area lacking direct legal precedent.

Questions Regarding the January 6th Commission

The transcript raises questions about why pardons were issued for individuals involved with the January 6th Commission if their work was "aboveboard." The destruction of evidence in relation to that investigation is also questioned.

Lack of Legal Precedent for Blanket Pardons

It is stated that there is no direct legal precedent for questioning a presidential pardon, but the unprecedented blanket pardons issued, especially for things that should not cause concern, are being examined. The justification provided is to prevent loss, but the speaker notes that this appears to be a one-way process.

Chat with this Video

AI-Powered

Hi! I can answer questions about this video "New report raises ALARMING questions about Biden’s auto-pen orders". What would you like to know?

Chat is based on the transcript of this video and may not be 100% accurate.

Related Videos

Ready to summarize another video?

Summarize YouTube Video