MP Diana Pang apologises for using ‘unparliamentary’ Hokkien phrase in speech

Key Concepts:

• Parliamentary language and decorum
• Use of colloquial expressions ("Hawin face") in formal settings
• Apology for inappropriate language
• Acceptance of apology by the Speaker

Main Points and Key Details:

The speaker acknowledges using the expression "Hawin face" during their speech. They understand that this expression may not be appropriate for parliamentary context. The speaker clarifies that they used the expression within the context of a story they were relating. The speaker explicitly states that they did not intend to be unparliamentary. The speaker offers an apology for the use of the expression. The Speaker accepts the apology.

Arguments and Perspectives:

The speaker's argument is that while the expression "Hawin face" was used, it was not intended to be disrespectful or unparliamentary. The speaker's perspective is that the context of the story should be considered. The Speaker's perspective is that the apology is sufficient to address the inappropriate language.

Notable Quotes:

• "Earlier in my speech, I had used a Hawin face which I'm given to understand may not be very appropriate to use in the parliamentary context." - Speaker
• "Did not meant to be unparliamentary. Please accept my apologies." - Speaker
• "Apology accepted." - Speaker

Technical Terms and Concepts:

• Parliamentary context: The formal setting and rules of a parliamentary session.
• Unparliamentary: Language or behavior that violates the rules and decorum of parliament.

Logical Connections:

The speaker's acknowledgement of the inappropriate language leads directly to their explanation of the context and their apology. The Speaker's acceptance of the apology provides closure to the issue.

Synthesis/Conclusion:

The speaker used an expression deemed inappropriate for parliamentary language. The speaker apologized, explaining the context and lack of intent to be disrespectful. The Speaker accepted the apology, resolving the issue. The incident highlights the importance of using appropriate language in formal settings like parliament.