'Minnesota AG Ellison lied under oath': Rep. Davis 'reveals' BOMBSHELL details of MN Somali fraud

Key Concepts

• Feeding Our Future Fraud: A massive scheme involving the theft of hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds intended for children's meals.
• 18 USC 1621: The federal statute governing perjury (lying under oath).
• Article 8, Section 2 (Minnesota Constitution): The legal basis for the impeachment of the Attorney General for corrupt conduct in office.
• Quid Pro Quo Allegations: The claim that campaign donations were exchanged for political interference in state investigations.
• MDE (Minnesota Department of Education): The state agency responsible for overseeing the programs targeted by the fraud network.

Allegations of Corrupt Conduct

The testimony centers on the assertion that Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison engaged in corrupt conduct by allegedly shielding individuals involved in the "Feeding Our Future" fraud network from state scrutiny. The speaker argues that this behavior constitutes a violation of his constitutional oath and warrants impeachment.

The December 11, 2021 Meeting

• Context: The FBI had been investigating the Feeding Our Future network for eight months prior to the meeting.
• Participants: Attorney General Ellison met with individuals directly linked to the fraud, including Ikram Mohamed (who later pleaded guilty to wire fraud).
• The Allegation: During this off-site meeting, captured on audio, Ellison allegedly expressed concern regarding the scrutiny these individuals were facing from state agencies. He reportedly stated, "the matter has my attention," and suggested that an inquiry from his office could force state agencies to "knock it off."
• Targeting Officials: It is alleged that the attendees provided Ellison with the name of a specific MDE official to target, and that Ellison texted his staff during the meeting to initiate an inquiry.

Financial Connections and Perjury

• Campaign Donations: On December 20, 2021—nine days after the meeting—$10,000 in campaign contributions were made to Ellison’s campaign and "Family Packs" by individuals tied to the meeting, including Gandhi Yusuf Mohamed (who later pleaded guilty to money laundering).
• Congressional Testimony: In February 2026, during questioning by U.S. Senator Josh Hawley, Ellison denied receiving campaign contributions from the fraud network nine separate times. The speaker asserts this testimony was false, citing campaign finance records as evidence.
• Restitution: The speaker notes that Ellison returned the donations nearly four years later, only after intense public scrutiny.

Institutional Negligence and Whistleblower Testimony

• Prior Knowledge: Citing testimony provided to Chairman James Comer’s House Oversight Committee, the speaker claims that both Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Ellison were aware of the fraud as early as 2019 and 2020.
• Political Cowardice: Ka Seong Hagen, a former investigator in the Medicaid fraud division, alleged that state leadership failed to act due to a "feckless fear" of being labeled racist or Islamophobic, allowing fraudsters to exploit the Somali community and state resources.
• Systemic Failure: Defense attorney Ryan Pacyga is quoted as saying, "No one was doing anything about the red flags. It was like someone was stealing money from the cookie jar and they kept refilling it."

Conclusion and Call to Action

The speaker characterizes the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funds not as a result of incompetence, but as a deliberate "political choice." The testimony concludes with a formal request for the committee to move forward with the motion for impeachment, emphasizing that the scale of the fraud requires historic accountability for constitutional officers. The speaker maintains that the evidence—including audio recordings, campaign finance spreadsheets, and whistleblower accounts—demonstrates a clear pattern of corrupt conduct that necessitates legislative intervention.