Masterclass: Transformation Starts with Fewer Projects
By Harvard Business Review
Key Concepts
- Project Portfolio Management: The overall management of a collection of projects.
- Project Kill Rate: The frequency with which projects are terminated.
- Innovation vs. Execution: The balance between initiating new projects and successfully completing existing ones.
- Psychological Barrier to Project Closure: The emotional difficulty leaders experience in terminating projects, often associating it with failure.
The Problem of Excessive Project Launching & Infrequent Closure
The speaker recounts a recurring observation from workshops conducted with senior leaders. When asked about their project launch rate, leaders frequently report a high frequency – approximately one project launched every two weeks, often citing a strong culture of innovation as the reason. However, when subsequently asked about the frequency of closing or terminating projects, a significant discomfort arises. The typical response is around once every three months. This disparity highlights a critical imbalance in project portfolio management.
The Psychological Impact of Project Termination
The speaker emphasizes the differing emotional responses to launching versus closing projects. Launching is perceived positively – as proactive, creative, and future-oriented. Conversely, terminating a project is often equated with failure, leading to reluctance and avoidance. This psychological barrier prevents leaders from making necessary, but difficult, decisions about resource allocation and strategic focus. The speaker notes the awkwardness observed in meetings when the topic of project closure is raised, indicating a shared discomfort among leaders.
The Value of Disciplined Project Closure
The speaker argues that becoming comfortable with stopping projects is, in fact, a positive development. Once leaders overcome the initial aversion, they begin to recognize the benefits of a more focused approach. Specifically, they observe that a disciplined approach to project termination frees up resources – time, budget, and personnel – allowing for greater concentration on fewer, higher-priority initiatives.
Effective Leadership: Focus over Volume
The core argument presented is that truly effective leaders are not defined by the number of projects they initiate, but by their ability to strategically select a limited number of projects and drive them to successful completion. This implies a shift in mindset from valuing innovation for its own sake to prioritizing execution and delivering tangible results. The speaker explicitly states, “The best leaders I’ve seen are not the ones that launch uh locked up projects, but know how to focus on a few ones and get them through the end.”
Logical Connection & Synthesis
The speaker establishes a clear connection between the high launch rate, the low closure rate, the psychological aversion to termination, and ultimately, the impact on leadership effectiveness. The initial observation serves as a problem statement, the psychological explanation provides context, and the argument for disciplined closure offers a solution. The overall takeaway is that a healthy project portfolio requires not only a robust pipeline of ideas but also the courage and discipline to kill projects that are no longer aligned with strategic goals or demonstrate a viable path to success.
Chat with this Video
AI-PoweredHi! I can answer questions about this video "Masterclass: Transformation Starts with Fewer Projects". What would you like to know?