Japanese museums seek remedies to storage crisisーNHK WORLD-JAPAN NEWS

Key Concepts

• Museum Storage Crisis: The critical lack of physical space in Japanese museums due to over-collection.
• Acquisition Policy: The strategic management of what items a museum collects and retains.
• Deaccessioning: The formal process of removing items from a museum collection, often controversial when involving historical artifacts.
• Cultural Heritage Preservation: The ethical responsibility of museums to maintain local identity and historical records for future generations.
• Collaborative Resource Management: Strategies like joint storage facilities and inter-institutional expertise sharing to mitigate space shortages.

---

The Storage Crisis in Japanese Museums

Japanese museums are currently facing a systemic crisis regarding the physical storage of their collections. As highlighted by the Sukagawa City Museum in Fukushima Prefecture, many institutions are operating well beyond their intended capacity.

• Case Study: Sukagawa City Museum: The museum currently holds over 70,000 items, primarily donated by local residents. Its storage capacity has reached 188%, leading to hazardous conditions where artifacts—including Edo-period Hino dolls, scrolls, and ceramics—are stacked to the ceiling, blocking aisles and risking damage.
• National Scope: A 2024 survey by the Japanese Association of Museums reveals that over 60% of museums in Japan report that their storage facilities are full.

Causes and Regulatory Shifts

Experts attribute this crisis to a historical lack of long-term planning regarding acquisition policies. Unlike the United Kingdom, where museums operate under strictly documented acquisition and management procedures, many Japanese institutions have historically accepted donations without a clear strategy for long-term maintenance.

• Regulatory Changes: In response to the crisis, the Japanese Agency for Cultural Affairs revised its museum management standards last month. These new rules include guidelines for the disposal of collection items, a move that has sparked significant debate among historians and curators.

The Risks of Disposal

There is widespread concern that items may be discarded prematurely due to a lack of immediate perceived value.

• The "Hidden Value" Argument: Historical significance is not always apparent at the time of acquisition.
• Case Study (Nara/Fukui): An item nearly discarded by a museum in Nara Prefecture was later identified by an expert in Fukui as a rare ritual object used by Onmyoji (traditional Japanese diviners) during the Edo to Meiji periods. This highlights the danger of disposing of items before their historical context is fully understood.

Proposed Solutions and Methodologies

To avoid the destruction of cultural heritage, several innovative approaches are being implemented:

1. Inter-institutional Expertise Sharing (Miyagi Prefecture): Experts from various fields and institutions are collaborating to evaluate collections. By pooling knowledge, they can better identify the historical importance of items that might otherwise be deemed "valueless" by a single institution.
2. Joint Storage Facilities (Mie Prefecture): Three institutions in Mie Prefecture are constructing a shared storage facility. This collaborative infrastructure is expected to double the total available storage space, allowing for more efficient management of resources.

Conclusion

The dilemma facing Japanese museums is a conflict between the physical limitations of space and the ethical mandate to preserve cultural identity. As noted in the report, museum collections are "gifts from the past to us and at the same time gifts from us to the future." The current shift toward collaborative storage and rigorous, expert-led evaluation represents a necessary evolution in how Japan manages its historical legacy, moving away from haphazard collection toward sustainable, long-term preservation.