In Lebanon, the idea of peace with Israel continues to deeply divide opinion • FRANCE 24 English

Key Concepts

• Normalization: The process of establishing diplomatic, economic, and social relations between states that were previously in conflict.
• Red Line: A metaphorical boundary or condition that cannot be crossed or compromised under any circumstances.
• Sonic Bombs: Military aircraft maneuvers that break the sound barrier at low altitudes, creating a loud, explosive-like noise intended to intimidate or psychologically distress a population.
• Displaced Persons: Individuals forced to flee their homes due to conflict, violence, or human rights violations.
• Sovereignty and Occupation: The core political dispute regarding the legitimacy of the state of Israel and the status of Palestinian territories.

---

Perspectives on Peace and Normalization in Lebanon

The discourse surrounding potential peace negotiations between Lebanon and Israel is deeply polarized, reflecting the country's complex sectarian and political landscape.

1. The Rejectionist Stance: Occupation and Resistance

A significant portion of the Lebanese population, particularly within the Shiite community and those directly affected by military conflict, views peace with Israel as an impossibility.

• Core Argument: Peace is viewed as a betrayal while active military operations continue. The occupation of Palestinian lands and the ongoing destruction in southern Lebanon serve as the primary justifications for this refusal.
• Psychological Impact: Residents from southern Lebanon, such as Maha, describe a history of trauma caused by daily bombings and the use of "sonic bombs." This constant state of fear has solidified a stance against any form of normalization.
• Preconditions for Dialogue: Proponents of this view argue that the burden of proof lies with Israel. They contend that Israel must demonstrate "goodwill" by withdrawing from Lebanese territory before any negotiations can be considered.

2. The Pragmatic Stance: Economic Stability and Governance

Conversely, some segments of the population, represented by individuals like Fadi Bitar, advocate for a pragmatic approach to end the cycle of conflict.

• Core Argument: This perspective prioritizes the restoration of national stability and the revitalization of the economy. Supporters argue that without a formal peace plan, Lebanon cannot attract the foreign investment necessary to recover from its ongoing crises.
• Methodology: This group supports negotiations conducted under the strict authority of the Lebanese government and President Joseph Aoun, ensuring that any peace deal is governed by conditions set by Lebanese leadership rather than unilateral concessions.

3. The Religious and Cultural Perspective: The Christian Community

In areas southeast of Beirut, the Christian community expresses a distinct desire for peace, rooted in both religious and historical contexts.

• Key Motivation: For many in this community, Israel is viewed as the "Holy Land." There is a strong desire to restore historical access to these sites, which has been severed by decades of conflict.
• Supporting Evidence: The community cites religious guidance, such as calls from the Vatican (referencing Pope Leo XIV), to pray for peace, framing the conflict as a barrier to their spiritual heritage.

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The debate over peace with Israel in Lebanon is not a monolithic issue but a reflection of the country's fractured social fabric. The divide is defined by:

• Security vs. Sovereignty: Those who have suffered direct displacement and military violence prioritize the end of occupation and military aggression as a prerequisite for any discussion.
• Economic Necessity vs. Ideological Resistance: Those focused on the country's economic collapse view peace as a necessary tool for state survival, while others view the very concept of "peace" as a violation of their political and moral principles.

Ultimately, the transcript highlights that while there is a growing desire among some to "turn the page on conflict," the deep-seated trauma of war and the lack of consensus on the legitimacy of the state of Israel ensure that any path toward normalization remains highly contentious and politically volatile.