How the Venezuela operation was carried out and what comes next

Key Concepts

• Delta Force: US Army’s elite special operations force.
• Narco-terrorism: Use of illicit drug trade to fund terrorist activities.
• Monroe Doctrine/Trump Corollary: US foreign policy principles regarding intervention in the Western Hemisphere.
• USS Ford: US Navy aircraft carrier potentially used for transport.
• Indictment (2020): Legal charges against Maduro filed in 2020.
• Nobel Peace Prize (Venezuelan Opposition Leader): Recent award highlighting the push for democratic elections in Venezuela.

---

Operation to Capture Maduro: Details and Implications

The operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife involved a swift and decisive action by US Delta Force, as evidenced by scenes from Caracas showing US helicopters – Shinooks and attack helicopters – operating over the city and explosions at airfields and military facilities. Sources indicate the CIA possessed “perfect intelligence” regarding Maduro’s location, enabling the successful capture. The specifics of the capture – whether Maduro surrendered or was forcibly taken – remain unknown, but the scale of the military assets deployed suggests he was caught completely by surprise. It is believed that US forces have likely already withdrawn from Venezuelan territory following the completion of the mission.

Potential Transport and Legal Proceedings

Following the capture, Maduro was likely transported via special operations helicopters, potentially to the USS Ford aircraft carrier. While direct flight to the US from the capture site may have been limited by fuel capacity, the USS Ford could facilitate transport, potentially with a stopover at Roosevelt Roads in Puerto Rico, where a US military buildup has been observed. Colonel Steve Ganard stated, “From the Ford, they can fly him all the way to the United States, perhaps stopping in Roosevelt Roads in Puerto Rico, where the US buildup has uh been most apparent.” The situation now transitions into a legal matter, with Maduro facing trial based on a 2020 indictment. Secretary Rubio suggested this operation may represent the culmination of necessary military action. The US is expected to maintain a military presence offshore to ensure the possibility of “free and fair elections” in Venezuela, particularly given the recent Nobel Peace Prize awarded to a leader of the Venezuelan opposition.

Historical Precedents and Contrasts

Martha Ratzitz drew parallels to the 1990 US intervention in Panama, where Manuel Noriega, a military dictator, was captured by US troops. However, she emphasized a key difference: Noriega was not an elected president. She also highlighted the case of Juan Hernandez, a Honduran convicted of drug trafficking and described by the Justice Department as being at the center of a massive drug conspiracy (400 tons of cocaine into the US), who was subsequently pardoned by President Trump in November. This pardon was noted as a stark contrast to the current situation with Maduro.

Justification and Broader Strategic Context

The recent escalation with Venezuela is rooted in the “Trump Corollary,” described by Colonel Ganard as an extension of the Monroe Doctrine, emphasizing security in the Western Hemisphere. The White House views Venezuela as a source of regional and global instability due to its alleged connections to Hezbollah, its role in supplying oil to Russia’s war effort in Ukraine, and its involvement in illicit drug trafficking. The administration believes that addressing the situation in Venezuela is crucial, given the links between drugs and illicit oil transfers. Ganard stated, “The White House sees Venezuela as the source of many problems, not only in South America, not only in Western Hemisphere, but around the world because of their connections to Hezbollah, to the oil that gets shipped offshore and helps keep the Russian war machine going in Ukraine.” The situation in Cuba, also supported by Venezuelan oil, was also raised as a related concern.

Unprecedented Nature of the Operation

Ratzitz emphasized the unprecedented nature of capturing a foreign leader and flying him out of the country, stating, “Well, I think we remember back to 1990 in Panama and Manuel Noriega was taken by US troops. That was an invasion of Panama, however, and Manuel Noriega was not ever really the elected president.”

Future Implications and Open Questions

The capture of Maduro raises numerous questions regarding the future governance of Venezuela and the well-being of its people. The focus now shifts to establishing a stable and democratic government through free and fair elections.

---

Synthesis/Conclusion

The capture of Nicolás Maduro represents a significant and potentially transformative event in Venezuelan history and US foreign policy. The operation, executed with precision by US Delta Force and supported by CIA intelligence, underscores the US commitment to addressing perceived threats emanating from Venezuela, including narco-terrorism, support for hostile actors, and destabilizing regional influence. While the legal proceedings against Maduro are underway, the long-term success of this intervention hinges on establishing a legitimate and stable government in Venezuela through democratic elections and addressing the underlying socio-economic factors that have contributed to the country’s instability. The contrasting case of the Trump pardon of Juan Hernandez highlights the complexities and potential inconsistencies in US drug policy and foreign intervention.