How high could the oil price go? | The Economist

Key Concepts

• Demand Destruction: The process by which high prices force consumers to reduce consumption, effectively balancing supply and demand when supply is constrained.
• Strait/Chokepoint: A critical maritime passage for oil transit; its closure is the primary driver of the current supply crisis.
• Stock Drawdown: The consumption of existing oil reserves (commercial, government, and oil-at-sea) to compensate for the lack of new production.
• Equilibrium Price: The theoretical price point required to balance supply and demand; in this context, estimated to be significantly higher than current market prices.
• "La La Land" Sentiment: A term used to describe the market's irrational optimism that the crisis would be short-lived and resolved via a quick peace deal.

---

1. The Scale of the Supply Crisis

The current crisis has resulted in the loss of approximately 14 million barrels per day (bpd), representing roughly 13% of global oil supply. Experts argue that current market prices are failing to reflect the severity of this deficit. Based on economic literature regarding the price elasticity required to "destroy" 13% of global demand, the theoretical equilibrium price ranges between $167 and $460 per barrel. While not a formal forecast, these figures highlight the extreme disconnect between current market pricing and the physical reality of the supply shock.

2. The Collapse of Market Optimism

Traders initially operated under three core assumptions that have since begun to fail:

• The conflict would be short-lived.
• A peace deal would be reached quickly.
• The critical maritime strait would reopen permanently, allowing supply to normalize.

As these assumptions collapse, the market is forced to confront the reality that the deficit is not a temporary blip but a structural crisis.

3. Comparative Analysis: The Russian Invasion of Ukraine

To contextualize the current situation, the speakers compare it to the Russian invasion of Ukraine:

• Ukraine Crisis: The market feared a loss of 3 million bpd. While much of that supply was redirected to China and India, the fear alone pushed oil prices to nearly $130 per barrel.
• Current Crisis: The current deficit is four to five times larger than the one experienced during the Ukraine crisis, yet current prices remain well below the $130 threshold, suggesting the market is still underestimating the severity of the situation.

4. The Role of Buffers and Stock Drawdowns

The reason the global economy has not yet ground to a halt is due to the rapid depletion of "buffers":

• Oil at Sea: Before the conflict, Gulf countries increased exports in anticipation of war, and existing sanctions on Russia/Iran had already created a surplus of tankers at sea. This provided a temporary cushion.
• Stock Depletion: Currently, 8 to 10 million barrels per day are being drawn from commercial and government stocks. This is described as a "record pace" that is unsustainable.
• Product Specifics: Stocks of jet fuel and diesel have fallen far below historical averages, reaching near-minimum levels required to sustain global trade.

5. Limitations of Alternative Production

The speakers argue that production increases elsewhere cannot "rescue" the world from this situation:

• Geographic Constraints: Most available spare capacity is located in the Middle East, which is trapped behind the same closed straits as the lost production.
• Scale Mismatch: Minor production increases from the U.S. or potential sanctions relief on other nations are described as "chalk and cheese" compared to the massive 14 million bpd deficit.

6. Synthesis and Conclusion

The current market is in a state of denial. Because the "buffers" (stocks and oil-at-sea) are being exhausted at an unsustainable rate, the only remaining mechanisms to balance the market are:

1. Commercial stock depletion: Which is currently taking the brunt of the impact but is finite.
2. Demand destruction: Which requires significantly higher prices to force consumers to reduce usage.

The consensus presented is that until prices rise substantially to force a reduction in global demand, the market will remain in a precarious state of imbalance. As noted by the speakers, physical traders—those responsible for moving the actual barrels—agree that current prices are insufficient to reflect the reality of the supply-demand gap.