How do Iranians feel about their government after so many of its citizens were killed? | DW News

Iran Protests and Crackdown: A Detailed Analysis

Key Concepts:

• Nationwide Demonstrations: Protests across Iran sparked by economic hardship, evolving into anti-government unrest.
• Government Crackdown: Severe repression of protests by Iranian security forces, resulting in significant casualties and arrests.
• Human Rights Violations: Allegations of mass killings, enforced disappearances, and torture by security forces.
• Regime Narrative: The Iranian government’s framing of the protests as foreign-instigated unrest.
• Legitimacy Crisis: Eroding public trust in the Iranian government and its ideology.
• Defection of Military Officials: A potential catalyst for regime change, requiring key figures within the armed forces to renounce the government.
• Hegemony vs. Legitimacy: Distinguishing between the regime’s power (hegemony) and its moral authority (legitimacy).
• Public Trauma: The intentional infliction of psychological terror by the state to deter future uprisings.

I. Scale of the Crackdown and Human Cost

The protests in Iran, initially triggered by economic hardship at the end of December, rapidly escalated into widespread anti-government demonstrations. The crackdown by the Iranian regime has been exceptionally brutal. Human Rights Activists working in Iran (HRANA), a US-based group, has verified the deaths of over 3,000 people during the first 20 days of the demonstrations. Furthermore, over 2,000 individuals sustained serious injuries, and more than 10,000 were arrested. These figures are potentially underestimates, according to experts. Families are desperately searching for missing loved ones, with reports of hundreds, possibly thousands, of bodies piled in morgues. The case of Roina Minan, a fashion student shot in the back of the head by security forces in Tehran, exemplifies the violence. Her aunt, Holly, in Norway, recounts the harrowing experience of her sister searching through countless bodies in an attempt to identify her daughter. The lack of funerals and limited contact with family members in Iran intensifies the grief and trauma.

II. Government Response and Narrative Control

The Iranian government has deployed significant security forces to quell the unrest, seemingly succeeding in suppressing the demonstrations in recent days. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei directly accused US President Donald Trump of inflicting casualties on the Iranian people during the protests. This accusation aligns with a long-standing narrative employed by the Iranian regime, blaming external actors – including the US, Israel, and other nations – for instigating unrest and manipulating Iranian politics. Other Iranian officials echo this sentiment, attributing the protests to foreign interference and attempting to deflect blame from the regime. However, analysts like Simon Maben at Lancaster University question the effectiveness of this narrative, noting that it resonates primarily with those already predisposed to such beliefs, while others perceive it as a hollow attempt to evade responsibility. The government justifies the violence as a necessary response to chaos and portrays deaths as the result of armed rioters hijacking the protests, a claim disputed by rights groups.

III. Analysis of Regime Stability and Future Prospects

Despite successfully suppressing the immediate protests, the underlying causes of unrest remain unaddressed and may have been exacerbated by the crackdown. Socioeconomic pressures, including a 70% rise in food prices, coupled with the continued repression of dissent and internet shutdowns, fuel ongoing anger. Ali Ansari, a historian and Iran expert at the University of St. Andrews, suggests this crackdown represents the greatest single slaughter of Iranian citizens by their government in approximately 150 years. He also notes that the brutality has broken the social contract between the state and its citizens.

Sarah Kimmanian, a researcher at the University of Sussex, argues that the regime has lost its hegemony (power) and legitimacy, with many Iranians now seeking its complete removal. She highlights a deliberate strategy of “public trauma” employed by the state, involving brutal killings and dehumanization of the dead to deter future uprisings.

Maben predicts further rounds of protests are inevitable. Ansari agrees, stating that while the regime has survived this episode, it faces enormous economic difficulties and a potentially unsustainable situation.

IV. Potential Catalysts for Regime Change

Both Maben and Ansari emphasize the critical role of defection from within the regime, specifically from key military officials and government figures. Drawing parallels with other instances of authoritarian regime collapse in the Middle East (Syria, Egypt), they argue that a shift in allegiance within the armed forces is essential for meaningful change. The possibility of external intervention is also raised, but its potential consequences – either rallying support for the regime or accelerating its downfall – remain uncertain.

V. Shifting Public Sentiment and International Reactions

The crackdown has significantly eroded public trust in the Iranian government. Kimmanian notes that for the first time, some Iranians are calling for foreign intervention, a historically unusual stance. The regime’s narrative is increasingly questioned, and its ideology appears to be losing its grip. However, Kimmanian criticizes some Western media outlets for giving a platform to Iranian government officials, even those repeating narratives that justify violence. She specifically points to statements by Donald Trump, which she views as inadvertently supporting the regime’s propaganda.

VI. Notable Quotes

• Holly (Roina Minan’s aunt): “She was practical and determined to gain her freedom. She went out unarmed, carrying only her voice and her body to call for freedom… and she was killed on her way toward freedom and a better life.”
• Simon Maben (Lancaster University): “These are stories from people who do not know what has happened to their loved ones in many cases… that produces so much anger, so much anxiety, so much concern.”
• Ali Ansari (University of St. Andrews): “This is probably the greatest single slaughter of Iranian citizens by their government in about 150 years.”
• Sarah Kimmanian (University of Sussex): “The state is now in a situation that it cannot really maintain its dominance other than through militaristic means.”

Conclusion:

The Iranian protests and the subsequent crackdown represent a critical juncture in the country’s history. While the regime has temporarily suppressed the unrest, the underlying causes remain unresolved, and the level of public anger is unprecedented. The regime’s legitimacy is severely compromised, and its reliance on brute force is unsustainable. The potential for future protests is high, and the possibility of regime change hinges on internal divisions within the government and the armed forces. The international community’s response, particularly the role of media and political leaders, will also play a crucial role in shaping the future of Iran. The situation remains volatile and requires continued monitoring and analysis.