Hegseth says he expects NATO countries to buy more US weapons for Ukraine | DW News

Key Concepts

• NATO Defense Ministers Meeting
• US Weapons for Ukraine
• Drone Wall (EU-NATO Collaboration)
• Russian Airspace Incursions/Provocations
• Eastern Sentry Mission
• Rules of Engagement
• Ukraine Defense Contact Group
• Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List (Pearl)
• Tomahawk Missiles
• Phase Zero (Russia's Strategy)
• Defense Spending (Germany, Estonia)
• Defense Innovation Base

---

NATO Defense Ministers Meeting and US Support for Ukraine

NATO's defense ministers convened in Brussels to address the escalating threat from Russia. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hgsth was in attendance. A key outcome is the commitment from NATO's newest members, Sweden and Finland, to purchase more weapons from the US to aid Ukraine. This decision follows a speech by Pete Hgsth, who expressed his expectation that NATO countries should procure US weaponry. To date, nations have collectively pledged approximately $2 billion for US weapons destined for Kyiv. The meeting takes place amidst a series of Russian aerial incursions into NATO territory and as US President Donald Trump considers supplying long-range Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine.

EU-NATO Collaboration on a "Drone Wall"

NATO chief Mark Rutter (Mark Rutte) announced that the European Union and NATO are actively collaborating on a "drone wall" initiative to safeguard member countries from Russian drone incursions. This proposal, originally put forth by the EU, emphasizes a synergistic approach. Rutter stated, "EU and NATO are really working very well together. There is no doubling at all." He highlighted the distinct strengths of each organization: NATO excels in the "hard stuff," encompassing standard setting, military capabilities, and the military side, while the EU leverages its "enormous soft power" through its internal market, financial resources ("making sure the money is there"), and aligning member nations. This combination is deemed "crucial to work together."

DW's Terry Schultz further clarified that the term "drone wall" originated from European Commission Chief Ursula Fondle (Ursula von der Leyen), but both organizations are now trying to move away from it. The concern is that the term implies an "impermeable barrier," which is not feasible against Russia's "very powerful capabilities." While the EU has its own counter-drone initiatives, close coordination is essential. NATO aims to retain command and control over drone initiatives along the eastern flank, while the EU provides the necessary funding. Kalas (Kaja Kallas) is expected to unveil the EU's "defense road map" soon, detailing their initiatives.

Russian Airspace Violations and Estonia's Response

The defense ministers' meeting follows a series of airspace violations by Moscow along Europe's eastern flank. Estonia, a significant supporter of Ukraine (measured by military aid per capita, having spent 1.4% of its GDP on aid to Kyiv), has faced increased pressure from Moscow. DW's Terry Schultz reported on an incident where Russian troops, with covered faces and displayed weapons, appeared on Estonia's border in unidentified uniforms, reminiscent of the "little green men" from Russia's 2014 invasion of Crimea. Estonian authorities viewed this as a "clear danger situation" and a "threat," despite Russian claims of "completely normal operations."

Other incidents include nearly 20 Russian drones invading Poland's airspace last month and three fighter jets loitering over Estonia for 12 minutes, an incident the Kremlin denied. In response, NATO swiftly established the "Eastern Sentry mission" for enhanced protection. While some advocate for shooting down Russian jets if they re-enter Allied airspace, Estonian Prime Minister Christian Mi (Kaja Kallas) expressed trust in NATO's current rules of engagement, which involve assessing the intention, direction, and weaponry of violators. She stated, "Everything is in place and it's working."

However, others warn that Moscow's provocations will intensify to divert Europe's focus and funds from Ukraine. Yalavichas suggested that NATO could respond without shooting down aircraft, for instance, by targeting Russian infrastructure or internet traffic reliant on European cables, proposing, "your internet speeds will be 25% less if that happens again." Prime Minister Mi cautioned that excessive public focus on these incidents benefits the Kremlin by shifting the narrative from Ukraine to border defense. She emphasized that the most effective way to counter Moscow's attempts to test NATO is to help Ukraine win the war more quickly.

Ukraine Defense Contact Group and US-NATO Dynamics

A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, where approximately 50 countries discussed their contributions to Ukraine. A key agenda item for both NATO and the Contact Group is the "Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List" (Pearl), an agreement between Mark Rutter (Mark Rutte) and the US where European nations fund US weapons for Ukraine, leveraging America's "high-end capabilities." Ukrainian Defense Minister Shme (Rustem Umerov) was present, seeking an answer regarding the potential supply of Tomahawk missiles.

Regarding US-NATO relations, the atmosphere was described as "a lot calmer" compared to previous meetings. This shift is attributed to a summit in The Hague in June, where President Donald Trump reportedly "finally understood that... NATO was not a ripoff." Pete Hgsth indicated he would seek "more firepower" from NATO countries. With an apparent agreement for allies to spend 5% (likely referring to 2% GDP defense spending target) and allocate a significant portion to US weapons, relations appear smoother, with no "fireworks" expected.

Expert Perspective on Drone Defense and Russian Escalation

Fabric Poier (Fabrice Pothier), CEO of Rasmussen Global and former Director of Policy Planning at NATO, provided an expert assessment. He advocated for European allies to seek "cheaper solutions" than F-35s or F-16s to counter Russian drones, emphasizing the potential of European technology and startups that have developed "cheaper, smarter solutions," partly through collaboration with Ukrainians. He stressed the need for innovation and boldness over "old defense."

On Russian escalation, Poier noted that the Institute for the Study of War suggests Russia has entered "phase zero" in Europe, preparing for a potential war, a warning echoed by Germany's top spy. Poier advised focusing on Russia's "action and the pattern" rather than speculating on intentions. He assessed NATO's response so far as "lore" (likely "low" or "lacking"), stating that while Article 4 has been invoked and collective statements made, the means of defense are "not really convincing" from a Russian perspective. He characterized Russia's actions as a "political attack campaign" against Europe, demanding a clearer response.

Regarding defense spending, Poier acknowledged Europe's increased commitments, including Germany debating reinstating the draft. He raised critical questions about the speed and sustainability of this spending, particularly Germany's central role, which is projected to spend around 160 billion euro/year by the end of the decade. He stressed a "window of five years" to build "more European mass, military mass deployable" and even fewer years to develop "military edge, some innovative solutions" to counter "cheap Russian drones." For the current meeting, Poier sought "more action and more money," specifically money flowing "more directly into the European defense innovation base." He argued against lengthy multinational programs, advocating for immediate solutions deployed at vulnerable points like the eastern flank and critical infrastructure, by scaling up companies with existing technology (radars, sensors, jamming techniques).

---

Conclusion

The NATO defense ministers' meeting underscores a critical period for European security, marked by heightened Russian aggression and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The discussions highlight a concerted effort to bolster defense capabilities, with increased spending commitments and a collaborative EU-NATO strategy for counter-drone defenses. While US-NATO relations appear stable, there's a clear emphasis on European nations taking greater responsibility for their security through substantial financial investment and the rapid development of innovative defense solutions. The consensus points to an urgent need for both immediate, creative responses to Russian provocations and sustained, long-term investment in a robust, technologically advanced European defense industrial base to deter further escalation and support Ukraine's victory.