Global ‘Total War’ Imminent As U.S. Readies Iran Strike | Xueqin Jiang

Key Concepts

• Geopolitical Shift: A potential realignment of global power dynamics driven by the decline of US hegemony and the rise of China, Russia, and Iran.
• US National Security Strategy: A shift towards prioritizing American interests, potentially at the expense of multilateralism and existing alliances.
• Color Revolution & Regime Change: Engineered political upheaval, often involving economic destabilization and support for opposition groups, with the ultimate goal of altering a nation’s government.
• Starlink Disruption: The Iranian government’s successful jamming of Starlink terminals, hindering communication among protesters and foreign agents.
• Grand Alliance (Russia-Iran-China): A potential strategic partnership posing a challenge to US and British naval dominance and global trade control.
• Economic Warfare & Attrition: A strategy focused on crippling an opponent’s economy through embargoes, infrastructure attacks, and disruption of trade.
• Greater Israel Project: A hypothesized geopolitical outcome involving the expansion of Israeli influence and control over a wider region in the Middle East.
• Transnational Capital: The influence of global financial elites in shaping geopolitical events and potentially orchestrating controlled collapses.
• Digital ID & Financial Control: The implementation of digital identification systems as a means of increased government surveillance and control over financial transactions.
• Civil Conflict in the US: The potential for escalating internal divisions and unrest within the United States, fueled by political polarization and cultural clashes.

The Looming Conflict with Iran and the Reshaping of the Global Order

The discussion centers on the escalating tensions surrounding Iran, framed as a potential catalyst for a global conflict and a fundamental reshaping of the international order. The analysis suggests a deliberate strategy by the US, under the Trump administration, to destabilize Iran and ultimately dismantle the nation-state, mirroring previous interventions in Libya, Syria, and Iraq.

The Imminent Strike on Iran & Regional Implications

The conversation begins with the observation of a significant US naval buildup in the Middle East, prompted by ongoing protests in Iran. Trump’s stated willingness to retaliate against the Iranian regime for suppressing these protests is seen as a clear indication of an impending strike. Air Canada’s cancellation of flights to Tel Aviv and Dubai is cited as evidence of anticipating imminent conflict.

The protests themselves are characterized as a “classic color revolution playbook,” involving engineered economic crises, embedded agents, and coordinated violence. However, the Iranian government’s successful jamming of Starlink terminals – used by protesters and allegedly Mossad agents for communication – is highlighted as a crucial factor that disrupted the planned operation and delayed potential airstrikes. Pompeo’s public support for the protesters and “Mossad agents walking beside them” is presented as further evidence of external involvement.

Trump’s Objectives: Beyond Regime Change

The analysis moves beyond a simple narrative of regime change, positing that the ultimate goal is “state collapse” – fragmenting Iran along ethnic lines. This aligns with a broader pattern observed in previous US interventions, where nation-states were deliberately weakened to the point of disintegration. A secondary objective is speculated to be control of oil resources, but the primary driver is identified as disrupting the formation of a powerful alliance between Russia, Iran, and China.

The fear is that this alliance, leveraging Russia’s military strength, China’s economic power, and Iran’s strategic location and oil reserves, could challenge US and British naval dominance and establish a Eurasian land-based power capable of circumventing sea-based trade control. This would threaten the economic foundations of the US and Britain, which are described as “party schemes” reliant on global trade.

The “Board of Peace” and a New World Order

Trump’s recently announced “Board of Peace” is interpreted not as a genuine effort at multilateralism, but as a manifestation of an “America First” agenda and a rejection of the existing global order. It’s presented as a parallel structure designed to consolidate power and assert American dominance, potentially excluding key allies like Canada. The composition of the board, including individuals previously on Trump’s immigration ban list, reinforces this interpretation.

Economic Warfare and the Collapse of the Fiat Currency System

The recent surge in gold and silver prices to $5,000 and $100 respectively is interpreted as a signal that investors are recognizing the impending collapse of the fiat currency system and the inevitability of global conflict. This is driving a flight to safe-haven assets.

The discussion highlights the vulnerability of the current economic system, with transnational capital seeking to maximize profits before orchestrating a controlled collapse. This involves exploiting existing vulnerabilities, such as the inflated housing market, and potentially triggering civil unrest to facilitate a restructuring of the global order.

The Potential for Global Conflict and Civil War

The analysis predicts a protracted and devastating conflict with Iran, one that the US is ill-equipped to win. Iran’s strategy is described as an economic war of attrition, aiming to disrupt global oil supplies and strangle the economies of Southeast Asia, Japan, China, and South Korea. This could draw other nations into the conflict, potentially leading to a wider global war.

Simultaneously, the discussion raises the specter of civil war within the United States, fueled by deep political and cultural divisions. The situation in Minnesota, with tensions between federal authorities and local communities, is presented as a microcosm of this broader conflict. The potential for election rigging and a sustained conflict are also highlighted.

The Rise of a New Center of Power: Greater Israel

A controversial hypothesis is presented regarding the emergence of a new world order centered around Israel, referred to as the “Greater Israel Project.” This involves the destruction of existing states in the Middle East, creating a power vacuum that Israel would fill. The devastation of Gaza is cited as a precursor to this plan, allowing for the construction of new infrastructure and the influx of cheap labor.

China and Japan: A Looming Conflict

Beyond the Middle East, the analysis identifies a potential conflict between China and Japan as a significant geopolitical flashpoint. This is linked to China’s ambitions in the South China Sea and its efforts to economically absorb Taiwan, which could threaten Japan’s access to vital resources and trade routes.

Key Quotes

• “The goal is not regime change per se. The goal is to collapse the state… Ideally Iran will will splinter into different… states according to the different ethnicities.” – Professor Shujin Jang, outlining the strategic objective beyond simply removing the current Iranian government.
• “The Americans are the last to realize that the world is collapsing, that the fiat currency model is no longer viable, that the world is headed towards complete total war.” – Professor Shujin Jang, emphasizing the perceived desperation of the US in maintaining its global dominance.
• “America is only interested in easy money. It's only interested in ensuring its strongness over the world and so it's heavily in debt.” – Professor Shujin Jang, describing the perceived motivations of the US in its current geopolitical strategy.

Conclusion

The analysis paints a bleak picture of the future, characterized by escalating geopolitical tensions, economic instability, and the potential for widespread conflict. The central argument is that the US, facing a decline in its global influence, is resorting to increasingly aggressive tactics to maintain its dominance, potentially triggering a cascade of events that could reshape the world order. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying motivations and strategic objectives of key players, as well as the potential for unforeseen consequences and unintended outcomes. The analysis suggests a period of profound upheaval and uncertainty lies ahead, with the fate of nations and the future of the global system hanging in the balance.