Giving Iran control of Strait of Hormuz would be a mistake, Bolton argues

Key Concepts

• Strait of Hormuz: A critical international waterway and chokepoint for global oil transit.
• Freedom of Navigation: The principle that international waters should remain open for free passage, which Bolton argues is being challenged by Iran.
• JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action): The 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran, from which the U.S. withdrew during the Trump administration.
• Regime Change: The strategic objective of replacing the current Iranian government, which Bolton advocates as the only long-term solution.
• Innocent Passage: A legal concept in maritime law allowing vessels to pass through territorial waters of another state, provided it is not prejudicial to peace or security.

---

1. The Crisis at the Strait of Hormuz

John Bolton argues that Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is a deliberate power play designed to force the international community into negotiations. He contends that:

• The Danger of Negotiation: Negotiating with Iran to reopen the strait validates their control over the waterway. Bolton warns that if Iran is allowed to "turn it on and off like a light switch," it sets a dangerous precedent for other global chokepoints, such as the Strait of Malacca.
• The Necessity of Force: Bolton asserts that the U.S. must be prepared to use military force to ensure the strait remains open. He argues that failing to act now will embolden Iran and weaken the global commitment to the freedom of the seas.

2. Strategic Risks and Iranian Resilience

Bolton addresses the potential for escalation and the resilience of the Iranian regime:

• Countering Escalation: When asked if military action would lead to attacks on U.S. allies in the Gulf, Bolton suggests that Iran is "bluffing." He argues that the Iranian regime is "desperately playing for time" to rebuild its nuclear, missile, and drone programs, as well as its proxy militias.
• Regime Entrenchment: Bolton compares the Iranian government to a "bigger version of Hamas," noting that for 47 years, the regime has focused on entrenching its power and building military infrastructure rather than serving its citizens. He cites this as evidence that the regime is more "fanatic and desperate" than the Trump administration initially anticipated.

3. Historical Precedents and Methodology

• Operation Earnest Will/Project Freedom: Bolton references past U.S. naval operations where American destroyers successfully engaged Iranian fast boats to protect shipping. He acknowledges that maintaining security in the strait is not "easy" but insists it is a fundamental obligation for the U.S. to uphold international maritime law.
• Intelligence and Planning: Bolton admits that if he were in charge of a regime change strategy, he would have relied more heavily on military intelligence and contingency planning, suggesting that the Trump administration’s approach was insufficient given the depth of Iran’s military entrenchment.

4. Key Arguments and Perspectives

• The "Light Switch" Argument: Bolton’s central thesis is that allowing Iran to dictate access to the Strait of Hormuz creates a permanent vulnerability. He argues that the U.S. has a "larger obligation" to the world to prevent this precedent from being established.
• The Threat of Nuclear Proliferation: A primary justification for Bolton’s hardline stance is the prevention of Iran’s nuclear program. He argues that if the regime is allowed to resume oil exports and rebuild its economy, it will inevitably use those resources to accelerate its nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities.

5. Notable Quotes

• "If we are not prepared to use force today, who in the future is going to be prepared to use it?" — John Bolton, regarding the necessity of maintaining control over the Strait of Hormuz.
• "Think of it as an even bigger version of Hamas... that is what the regime in Iran has done." — Bolton, describing the extent to which the Iranian government has militarized its infrastructure.

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

John Bolton’s position is rooted in the belief that the Iranian regime is an existential threat that cannot be managed through diplomacy or economic pressure alone. He views the current blockade of the Strait of Hormuz not as a localized maritime dispute, but as a fundamental challenge to the international order. His proposed solution is a combination of decisive military action to secure the strait and a long-term strategy of regime change, arguing that any concessions made to the current leadership in Tehran will only provide them the time and resources to further threaten global security through nuclear and terrorist activities.