GitHub Spec Kit: Can It FINALLY Fix “Vibe Coding”?
By Prompt Engineering
TechnologyAIBusiness
Share:
Key Concepts
- Specs-driven development: A methodology focusing on detailed specifications before coding.
- Coding agents: AI tools like Cursor, Codec, Claude, Gemini, Copilot used for code generation.
- Product Requirements Document (PRD): A comprehensive document detailing the features, functionality, and purpose of a product.
- Custom Commands: Specific instructions or actions that can be executed within a coding environment.
- Test-Driven Development (TDD): A software development process where tests are written before the code.
- Specification Kit: A framework provided by GitHub for implementing specs-driven development.
1. The Problem: Lack of Specifications in AI Coding
- The main problem with AI-assisted coding is the lack of detailed specifications, not the coding agents' capabilities.
- Coding agents make too many assumptions based on simple text prompts, leading to errors.
- Solution: Provide clear feature descriptions, detailed technical plans (including tech stack), and a product requirements document (PRD).
2. Specs-Driven Development and GitHub's Spec Kit
- Specs-driven development involves creating detailed specifications before coding.
- Examples: Kirro from AWS (expensive), GitHub's Spec Kit (integrates with existing coding agents).
- The video focuses on GitHub's Spec Kit, its setup, capabilities, and limitations.
3. Four-Step Process Using the Specification Kit
- Step 1: Specify: Describe what to build (what and why), focusing on functional and non-functional requirements.
- Step 2: Plan: Define technical details, architecture, and tech stack. The agent assists in refining the plan. Use
/plancommand. - Step 3: Task: Create manageable and actionable tasks for the agent to perform sequentially or in parallel. Use
/taskcommand. - Step 4: Test: Implement using test-driven development.
4. Setting Up and Using the Spec Kit
- No installation is required.
- Copy and run a command in the IDE or coding agent to download the template.
- Example command:
npx degit github/github/specs-kit#main image-nano-banana(project name is customizable). - The command creates a project folder with:
.cloudfolder: Containsplan,specify, andtaskscustom commands.memory: Used for context management.scripts: Scripts run by the agent at each step.templates: Templates for planning, specification, and task creation.
- The
/specifycommand is used to define the feature to be implemented.
5. Example Project: Image Generation with Nano Banana
- The presenter describes an example project: "Using nano banana to create images of a person in different styles based on an uploaded image."
- A detailed product requirement document (PRD) was created using GPT-5.
- The functional and non-functional requirements from the PRD are used in the specification stage.
- The agent updates files (e.g.,
specsfile) based on the initial request. - The agent may ask for clarifications, tagged as "needs clarification."
6. Planning and Task Creation
- The planning stage uses technical details from the PRD, including API implementation.
- The agent uses web search to collect information for implementation.
- The agent creates a design and updates markdown files to document the process.
- The agent generates individual tasks (e.g., 45 tasks in one example).
- The
/taskcommand is used to execute the tasks sequentially or in parallel.
7. Test-Driven Development and Task Execution
- The agent focuses on test-driven development.
- Tasks are numbered sequentially (001, 002, etc.).
- Task complexity varies, affecting execution time (e.g., one set of tasks took 1 hour 18 minutes).
- In one example, the process resulted in 59 tasks, including setup, testing, and integration testing.
8. Strengths and Weaknesses
- Strengths:
- Thoroughness: The agent is very detailed in its design and implementation.
- Learning opportunity: Reading the agent's design, specs, and implementation tasks can be educational.
- Documentation: The agent updates
cloud.mdlike a human programmer. - Support for multiple coding agents (Claude Code, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot).
- Weaknesses:
- Not fully polished (first iteration).
- Adds implementation time, especially for simple projects.
- Can be slow (e.g., over 2 hours for one project).
- The presenter hasn't figured out an easy way to implement a feature in an existing codebase.
9. Conclusion
- GitHub's Spec Kit is worth checking out for those using coding agents.
- It adds overhead but can be helpful for complex projects.
- The agent's thoroughness and documentation are valuable.
- The tool is still in its early stages and has limitations.
- The presenter encourages viewers to try the tool and share their experiences.
Chat with this Video
AI-PoweredHi! I can answer questions about this video "GitHub Spec Kit: Can It FINALLY Fix “Vibe Coding”?". What would you like to know?
Chat is based on the transcript of this video and may not be 100% accurate.