'Get the f**k out' Minneapolis mayor slams ICE after woman shot dead | DW News

Key Concepts

• ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement): A U.S. federal law enforcement agency responsible for identifying, arresting, and removing individuals who are in the United States illegally.
• Community Impact: The negative effects of ICE presence on Minneapolis residents, specifically regarding safety, family separation, and economic/cultural contributions.
• Accountability: Direct attribution of harm and death to ICE’s actions and a demand for their departure.

Demand for ICE Departure from Minneapolis

The core message of this statement is a forceful demand for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to leave Minneapolis. The speaker directly addresses ICE, stating unequivocally, “Get the out of Minneapolis. We do not want you here.” This isn’t framed as a request, but as a firm rejection of their presence.

Justification Based on Negative Impact

The speaker argues that ICE’s presence is counterproductive to its stated goal of creating safety. Instead of enhancing safety, the speaker asserts that ICE’s actions are actively causing harm: “Your stated reason for being in this city is to create some kind of safety, and you are doing exactly the opposite. People are being hurt.” This claim is supported by detailing the negative consequences experienced by Minneapolis residents.

Specifically, the speaker highlights the terrorization of “long-term Minneapolis residents that have contributed so greatly to our city, to our culture, to our economy.” This emphasizes that the harm isn’t limited to those directly targeted by ICE, but extends to the broader community and those who actively build and sustain the city. The speaker stresses the value of these residents, framing their contributions as essential to Minneapolis’ identity and prosperity.

Direct Attribution of Harm and Loss of Life

The statement takes a particularly strong tone by directly attributing a death to ICE’s actions: “And now somebody is dead. That’s on you.” This is a significant accusation, placing direct responsibility for a loss of life on the agency. The lack of specific details regarding the death doesn’t diminish the weight of the accusation; it serves to underscore the severity of the perceived consequences of ICE’s presence.

Demand for Removal

Following the accusation of responsibility for a death and the detailing of community harm, the speaker reiterates the demand for ICE’s departure: “And it’s also on you to leave.” This final statement reinforces the central message and presents it as a necessary course of action to rectify the harm caused.

Synthesis/Conclusion

The statement is a passionate and direct condemnation of ICE’s presence in Minneapolis. It argues that ICE’s actions are detrimental to the community, causing harm, terrorizing residents, and ultimately leading to loss of life. The core takeaway is a firm demand for ICE to leave Minneapolis, framed as a necessary step to restore safety and protect the city’s residents and its cultural fabric. The language is accusatory and uncompromising, reflecting a strong sense of urgency and frustration.