Gemini 2.5 Flash: POWERFUL & CHEAPEST Model BEATS GPT 4.5, Deepseek R1, 3.7 Sonnet! (Fully Tested)

By WorldofAI

AITechnologyBusiness
Share:

Key Concepts:

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash: A low-latency, cost-efficient AI model designed for high-volume, real-time applications.
  • Thinking Mode vs. Non-Thinking Mode: Two pricing tiers for Gemini 2.5 Flash, with different costs for input and output tokens based on the level of reasoning required.
  • Context Window: The amount of information the model can consider at once (1 million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Flash).
  • Agentic Workflows: Automated processes driven by AI agents.
  • Benchmark Tests: Standardized tests used to evaluate the performance of AI models in various tasks.
  • Google AI Studio: A platform for developing and experimenting with AI models.

1. Introduction of Gemini 2.5 Flash

  • Google has released Gemini 2.5 Flash, an AI model positioned as a cost-efficient and low-latency workhorse.
  • It's designed for high-volume, real-time applications like chatbots, analytics, and agentic workflows.
  • The model builds on the Gemini 2.5 series, known for advanced reasoning capabilities.
  • The goal is to provide quality comparable to larger models like Gemini 2.5 Pro but with faster speeds and lower costs.

2. Pricing Structure

  • Two pricing tiers:
    • Thinking Mode: $0.15 per million input tokens, $3.50 per million output tokens.
    • Non-Thinking Mode: $0.15 per million input tokens, $0.60 per million output tokens.
  • The non-thinking mode is exceptionally cheap, making it suitable for real-time applications.
  • Google aims to power the next generation of agentic workflows and chatbots with this model.

3. Request Limits

  • The free tier now allows around 500 requests per day, a significant increase from previous limits.

4. Benchmark Performance

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash performs well compared to other models like OpenAI's 04, Mini, Claw 3.7 Sonnet, Gra 3 Beta, and Deepseek R1.
  • It generally outperforms these models in multilingual, long context, math, and science tasks.
  • It lags slightly behind in live codebench.
  • It's a good alternative to Cloud 3.7 Sonnet due to its pricing.

5. Accessing the Model

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash is accessible through Google AI Studio.
  • Users can select the model and choose between the thinking and non-thinking modes.
  • There's an option to set a "thinking budget" to use a cheaper option.

6. Benchmark Tests and Examples

  • The video demonstrates the model's capabilities through various benchmark tests:

    • Front-End Development: Creating a modern note-taking app with sticky notes. The model successfully generated a functional app with drag-and-drop functionality and color options.
    • Python Coding: Implementing Conway's Game of Life. The model generated a Python script that produced the simulation in the terminal, including generating available patterns.
    • SVG Generation: Generating SVG code for a symmetrical butterfly shape. The model surprisingly created a recognizable butterfly shape, demonstrating spatial reasoning and SVG syntax knowledge.
    • Algebraic Equation: Solving a train speed/distance problem. The model correctly calculated the meeting time of the two trains.
    • Creative Coding: Coding a TV that lets the user change channels with number keys using p5.js. The model generated a functional TV app with different creative generations.
    • Reading Comprehension and Scientific Reasoning: Explaining why a hybrid model was better based on a climate modeling paper. The model synthesized information from multiple sections and provided a reasonable answer.
    • Deductive Reasoning: Solving a detective case with conflicting statements to identify the guilty person. The model correctly identified the guilty party and provided logical reasoning.

7. Conclusion

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash passed all benchmark tests, demonstrating its impressive capabilities.
  • Its pricing structure is a major advantage, making it a budget-friendly alternative to other state-of-the-art models.
  • The model offers similar performance to Gemini 2.5 Pro, Rock 3, and Claw 3.7 Sonnet at a lower cost.
  • The speaker recommends using this model due to its cost-effectiveness and performance.

Chat with this Video

AI-Powered

Hi! I can answer questions about this video "Gemini 2.5 Flash: POWERFUL & CHEAPEST Model BEATS GPT 4.5, Deepseek R1, 3.7 Sonnet! (Fully Tested)". What would you like to know?

Chat is based on the transcript of this video and may not be 100% accurate.

Related Videos

Ready to summarize another video?

Summarize YouTube Video