From the archives: Cuba shoots down 2 civilian planes in 1996

Key Concepts

• Brothers to the Rescue: A Cuban-American exile group conducting search and rescue missions for refugees.
• International Waters: Areas beyond the 12-mile territorial limit of a nation where international law applies.
• 12-Mile Buffer Zone: The recognized limit of Cuban sovereign airspace.
• MiG Fighters: Soviet-designed supersonic jet fighters used by the Cuban Air Force.
• International Law (Use of Force): Legal standards requiring non-lethal measures (such as escorting aircraft) before resorting to military force against civilian planes.
• 24th Parallel: A geographic reference point used in the flight path of the incident.

---

1. Incident Overview and Timeline

The Clinton administration called for an emergency UN Security Council session following the downing of two civilian aircraft by the Cuban military. The planes belonged to "Brothers to the Rescue," a group that performs routine search and rescue operations for refugees in the Florida Straits.

Chronology of Events:

• 1:00 PM: Three planes depart Miami.
• 2:57 PM: Planes cross the 24th parallel; Cuba issues warnings.
• 3:22 PM: One plane enters Cuban airspace by 2 miles.
• 3:24 PM: Cuban MiGs ignore the plane that entered their airspace and instead shoot down a different plane in international waters.
• Subsequent Minutes: A second plane is shot down 14 miles outside of Cuban airspace.

2. Conflicting Perspectives and Evidence

• The US Position: Officials maintain the attacks occurred in international waters, constituting a "blatant violation of international law." Secretary of State Warren Christopher emphasized that Cuba failed to follow standard protocols, such as attempting to escort the aircraft out of their airspace before using force.
• The Cuban Position: Cuban authorities claim all planes were violating their sovereign airspace. They framed the action as a necessary measure to teach the exile group a "harsh lesson" and to demonstrate that Cuba remains a military power.
• Witness Testimony: Passengers on a nearby cruise ship witnessed the attack, describing the planes catching fire and falling into the water.

3. Pre-Incident Warnings and Diplomatic Context

Two weeks prior to the incident, retired US military officers, including Admiral Eugene Carroll, met with Cuban military leaders in Havana. During these talks, Cuban officials explicitly warned that they possessed the anti-aircraft capabilities to down the exile planes and were frustrated by the US government's failure to stop the incursions. Admiral Carroll warned the Cubans that such an action would be a "disaster," but the Cubans ultimately decided to act after feeling their warnings were ignored.

4. Political Fallout and US Response

• Administration Stance: President Clinton did not rule out a military response and indicated the US would consider both multilateral (UN) and unilateral actions.
• Republican Criticism: Political opponents criticized the administration’s policy toward Cuba, arguing that the White House had been too lenient with Fidel Castro. Some suggested a more aggressive military posture, including the potential to shoot down Cuban planes if they attack in international waters.
• Diplomatic Impact: The incident has severely damaged the progress made in US-Cuba relations over the previous year, effectively setting diplomatic efforts back significantly.

5. Notable Quotes

• Secretary of State Warren Christopher: "The Cuban actions yesterday were a blatant violation of international law and a violation of the norms of civilized behavior."
• Admiral Eugene Carroll (on the Cuban military's mindset): "I advised them that I thought it would be a disaster and I'm afraid that they just reached the point where they thought, well, we've warned them, we've told them... now we'll act."
• Jose Basulto (Pilot): Describing the attack, he noted, "We saw a MiG, perhaps two, cross diagonally across our windshield in front of our aircraft. Like in a dive on an attack mode."

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The downing of the two civilian aircraft represents a major escalation in tensions between the US and Cuba. While the Cuban government viewed the act as a sovereign defense against repeated airspace violations, the US government and international observers categorize it as an illegal use of force against civilians in international waters. The incident highlights a failure in communication and diplomatic restraint, resulting in a significant setback for bilateral relations and forcing the Clinton administration to weigh the risks of military retaliation against the necessity of upholding international law.