From Selma to now: Are US voting rights being rolled back? | DW News

Key Concepts

• Voting Rights Act of 1965: Landmark legislation designed to protect the voting rights of Black Americans, specifically by preventing discriminatory practices.
• Gerrymandering/Redistricting: The manipulation of electoral boundaries to favor a specific political party, often used to dilute the voting power of minority groups.
• Jim Crow: A system of state and local laws that enforced racial segregation and disenfranchisement in the Southern United States.
• Pre-clearance Clause: A provision of the Voting Rights Act (gutted by the Supreme Court in 2013) that required jurisdictions with a history of discrimination to obtain federal approval before changing voting laws.
• Disruptive Protest: A strategy advocated by activists to move beyond symbolic marching toward actions that challenge the status quo and economic comfort of those in power.
• Cyclical Progress: The historical pattern of civil rights advancements followed by intense political and social backlash.

---

1. The Current State of Voting Rights and Political Power

The discussion centers on the ongoing struggle for Black political representation in the United States, framed against the backdrop of the Trump presidency. Experts argue that the current political climate represents a "backlash" against the progress made by Black voters.

• The Attack on Power: Professor Gloria Brown-Marshall notes that Black voters, despite being roughly 13% of the population, possess the power to decide election outcomes. Consequently, they have faced systemic attacks—ranging from poll taxes and literacy tests in the past to modern-day redistricting and Supreme Court rulings—designed to undermine this influence.
• Supreme Court’s Role: The Supreme Court is described as having a conservative supermajority that has systematically weakened voting protections, most notably by gutting the "pre-clearance" requirement in 2013.

2. Historical Context and the "Anomaly" of Progress

Professor Gerald Horn provides a historical perspective, arguing that the period between 1954 and 1968 was an "anomaly" of progressive judicial rulings.

• 1954 Precedent: On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court ruled that Jim Crow laws were unconstitutional. Horn argues this was driven by intense global pressure during the Cold War, as the U.S. sought to project a democratic image against the Soviet Union.
• The Return to Normality: Horn suggests that the current era is a return to the Court’s historical tendency to uphold systems of inequality. He notes that without the current level of international pressure that existed in the 1950s, the resistance to civil rights is more emboldened.

3. The Strategy of Redistricting

The panelists identify a coordinated effort by the Republican party to redraw electoral maps to secure political dominance.

• Geographic Scope: Efforts are currently underway or planned in states including Florida, Texas, Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi.
• Legal Thresholds: Brown-Marshall explains that while the Supreme Court allows redistricting for political gain, it prohibits it for racial reasons. However, the Court now requires proof of "intentional racial discrimination," a high legal bar that makes it easier for states to dilute the Black vote under the guise of political strategy.

4. The Role of Protest and Disruption

A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the efficacy of modern activism.

• Beyond Symbolic Action: Brown-Marshall argues that while marching is symbolic and necessary, it is insufficient on its own. She calls for "disruptive protest"—actions that target the economic interests of the status quo to make oppression uncomfortable for those in power.
• Global Influence: Both experts emphasize the need for international support. Horn suggests that global pressure was a catalyst for the 1954 desegregation rulings and remains a vital tool for checking the current administration.

5. Notable Quotes

• Senator (New Jersey): "There is no liberation without obligation. Because if we in our generation do not now do our duty, we will lose the gains and the rights and the liberties that our ancestors afforded us."
• Gloria Brown-Marshall: "You cannot appease a dictator and Donald Trump is a dictator."
• Gerald Horn: "It is oftentimes darkness before the dawn. And I remain confident that since we represent a global majority, we'll be able to wield global influence against Mr. Trump in the White House."

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The discussion concludes that the United States is currently in a period of intense political backlash, characterized by a coordinated effort to dismantle Black political power through gerrymandering and judicial erosion. The experts agree that the current situation is not an isolated event but part of a centuries-old cycle of progress and resistance. The primary takeaway is that symbolic protest is no longer enough; effective resistance requires strategic, disruptive action and renewed international pressure to hold the current political leadership accountable. The panelists remain cautiously optimistic, viewing the current "darkness" as a precursor to a necessary, albeit difficult, period of renewed civil rights advocacy.