Exclusive: 'International law has died' with Maduro's capture, Venezuela's attorney general says

Interview with Venezuelan Attorney General, T.K. William Saab – France 24

Key Concepts:

• Sovereignty: The principle of a nation’s right to govern itself without external interference.
• International Law: A set of rules and principles governing relations between states.
• Narco-trafficking: The illegal trade of narcotics.
• Immunity (of Head of State): Legal protection from prosecution afforded to a head of state.
• Cognitive Warfare: The use of information and psychological operations to influence perceptions and behaviors.
• Unilateral Action: Action taken by one party without the consent of others.
• Political Prisoners: Individuals imprisoned for their political beliefs or activities.

I. The Capture of Maduro and Flores & Accusations of Narco-trafficking

The interview centers on the January 3rd capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores by US authorities, and their subsequent detention in New York on narco-trafficking charges. Attorney General T.K. William Saab vehemently condemns the action as an “unprecedented event” marking a turning point in Latin American history. He asserts that President Maduro possesses complete immunity as a head of state, rendering any trial outside of Venezuela illegitimate.

Saab directly challenges the US accusations, stating that the US Justice Department itself has acknowledged the non-existence of “Los Soles cartel,” the alleged organization Maduro was accused of leading. He demands the immediate release of Maduro and Flores, emphasizing that the US action constitutes a violation of international law and Venezuelan sovereignty. He highlights the UN’s condemnation of the “unilateral action” and draws a parallel, questioning whether France would accept a similar intrusion upon its sovereignty. He frames the situation as a power grab motivated by a desire to seize Venezuela’s natural resources.

II. Investigation into the US Raid & Alleged Casualties

Regarding the deaths of Venezuelan military personnel and civilians during the US raid, Saab confirms that an independent investigation is underway, independent of any pressure from the Trump administration. He states that over 100 innocent people have lost their lives during these attacks, describing the raid as an “invasion” violating Venezuelan airspace and sovereignty. He asserts that “international law has died” in this instance, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.

III. Release of Detainees & Political Prisoners

The interview addresses the recent releases of detainees announced by National Assembly President Jorge Rodriguez. While acknowledging the releases, Saab clarifies that they are occurring on a case-by-case basis, determined by the nature of the crimes committed. He refutes the notion of a mass release of all approximately 800 alleged political prisoners, emphasizing that due process will be followed. He frames the releases as part of ongoing legal procedures within the Venezuelan justice system.

IV. El Rodeo Prison & Allegations of Torture

Responding to Donald Trump’s claims about a “torture chamber” in El Rodeo prison, Saab dismisses the statements as part of a “cognitive war” against Venezuela. While acknowledging testimonies from individuals held in the jail, he clarifies that his role as Attorney General focuses on citizen power, human rights, and legal procedures, not prison administration. He reiterates that Venezuela is a victim of systematic attacks disguised as human rights concerns.

V. US-Venezuela Relations & Trump’s Statements

Saab addresses the seemingly contradictory statements from Donald Trump, who claims a “very good relationship” and cooperation with Venezuela despite the ongoing condemnation from Venezuelan officials. He emphasizes that the Venezuelan Council of Ministers and Security Defense Council share the same concerns he has expressed, advocating for dialogue, democracy, and peace. He stresses the need to avoid further escalation and respect for Venezuelan national sovereignty.

He directly responds to Trump’s social media post claiming to be the interim president of Venezuela, stating unequivocally that Nicolás Maduro is the legitimate president, citing constitutional requirements regarding birth and citizenship.

VI. Allegations of a Secret Agreement & Imperialistic Motives

Saab dismisses reports of a secret agreement between Maduro and the Trump administration to oust Nicolás Maduro as part of the ongoing “war” against Venezuela. He highlights the casualties resulting from the raid, including civilians unrelated to military targets, and asserts that a full investigation will reveal the truth. He reiterates the claim that the operation was “imperialistic” in nature, aimed at seizing Venezuela’s natural resources and sowing division.

VII. Prospects for Normalization of Relations

Despite the current tensions, Saab expresses hope for a return to normal relations and even diplomatic ties between the US and Venezuela, emphasizing the importance of peace and dialogue. He notes ongoing discussions through the UN and with allied countries to facilitate negotiation and de-escalation. He reiterates that the events of January 3rd are a departure from diplomatic norms.

Notable Quotes:

• “A president who has immunity is being tried… nobody outside Venezuela can judge him.” – T.K. William Saab
• “International law has died at this time.” – T.K. William Saab
• “Would French society accept this? Would the French people indeed accept this? Or would French institutions accept this? The answer is clearly no.” – T.K. William Saab
• “The president of Venezuela is Delia Rodriguez.” – T.K. William Saab (responding to questions about Trump’s claims)

Data & Statistics:

• Over 100 innocent people have reportedly lost their lives during attacks related to the US raid.
• Approximately 800 individuals are alleged to be political prisoners in Venezuela.

Logical Connections:

The interview follows a logical progression, starting with the immediate aftermath of the capture of Maduro and Flores, then addressing the investigation, the issue of detainees, and finally, the broader context of US-Venezuela relations and the potential for future dialogue. Each section builds upon the previous one, reinforcing the Venezuelan government’s narrative of a violation of sovereignty and international law.

Synthesis/Conclusion:

The interview presents a strong defense of Venezuelan sovereignty and a condemnation of the US actions as a violation of international law. Attorney General Saab consistently frames the situation as a politically motivated attempt to destabilize Venezuela and seize its resources. While acknowledging ongoing legal processes within Venezuela, he emphasizes the need for dialogue and respect for national sovereignty as the path towards a peaceful resolution. The interview offers a clear articulation of the Venezuelan government’s perspective on the crisis and its determination to defend its interests.