Ep60 “A Trade Deficit? More Like a Capital Surplus” with John Cochrane
By Stanford Graduate School of Business
FinanceBusinessEconomics
Share:
Summary of All Else Equal Podcast: Trade Deficits and Tariffs
Key Concepts:
- Trade Deficit vs. Capital Surplus: The inverse relationship between the two.
- Mercantilism: The belief that exporting more than importing is beneficial.
- Fallacy of Composition: The error of assuming that what is good for an individual is necessarily good for the whole.
- Savings and Investment: The fundamental drivers of trade deficits.
- Unilateral Free Trade: The idea that a country benefits from free trade regardless of other countries' policies.
- Supply Chains: The interconnected network of businesses involved in the production and distribution of goods.
- Stagflation: A combination of slow economic growth and high inflation.
Trade Deficits and Capital Surpluses
- A trade deficit occurs when a country imports more goods and services than it exports.
- John Cochran argues that policymakers are fixated on the trade deficit due to mercantilist beliefs and fallacies of composition.
- Jonathan Burke jokes about renaming the trade deficit to the "capital surplus" to highlight the inverse relationship.
- A trade deficit is always matched by a capital account surplus. When a country has a trade deficit, it is essentially borrowing from other countries.
- If China sends goods to the US, they receive dollars, which they then use to invest in US securities. This investment is the capital account surplus.
- Countries like China and Japan with aging populations may optimally invest abroad to save for future consumption needs.
- The overall trade deficit is determined by the difference between savings and investment within a country.
- Distortions in savings and investment policies, such as China's lack of a welfare state and the US government's borrowing for consumption, can affect trade deficits.
The Impact of Tariffs
- Tariffs are taxes on imported goods.
- The Trump administration imposed tariffs to reduce trade deficits and protect domestic industries.
- John Cochran believes that tariffs are an answer wildly in search of a question.
- Tariffs on avocados from Mexico will not stop China from invading Taiwan.
- Tariffs are unlikely to solve the underlying issues facing disenfranchised communities.
- The economic damage of a tax rate is proportional to the square of the tax rate. A 100% tariff is much more damaging than a 10% tariff.
- Tariffs can disrupt supply chains, leading to higher prices and job losses.
- The uncertainty created by tariffs can discourage investment.
- Tariffs can lead to stagflation, bankruptcies, and a recession.
- Tariffs can damage relationships with other countries, making it difficult to cooperate on other issues.
- Janet Yellen called tariffs the greatest unforced error in economic policymaking.
- Tariffs can disproportionately affect the cost of goods, leading to inflation.
- Many imports from China are industrial inputs and manufactured goods. Taxing these goods can hurt US businesses.
- Under current tariffs, businesses do not get credit for what they have exported. If a part is in a car and it goes back across the border five times, you tariff it five times.
Historical Perspective and Alternative Solutions
- Historically, countries that are open to trade have been more prosperous.
- Countries that have erected tariff and protection barriers have experienced stagnation and lack of innovation.
- Examples of countries that have suffered from protectionist policies include India, Europe, and the US.
- The China shock was very small.
- There is an underemployment problem in the US, but it is not from lack of jobs.
- The people who've been sitting around for ten years and cashing a government check are not able to take 12-hour day jobs assembling iPhones or even the high-tech manufacturing they're doing.
- The US should focus on addressing the social problems and lack of skills that prevent people from participating in the labor force.
Geopolitical Considerations
- Tariffs may be used as a negotiating tactic to lower tariffs globally.
- However, it is not clear that this is the Trump administration's goal.
- The administration may be aiming for zero trade deficits with every country.
- Tariffs can damage relationships with allies, making it difficult to cooperate on other issues.
- Tariffs may be driving the world into China's hands.
- The US bailed out of the Trans Pacific Partnership, now they're on their own.
Conclusion
- The podcast concludes with a discussion of the potential negative consequences of tariffs, including economic damage, political fallout, and damage to international relations.
- John Cochran expresses concern that tariffs will lead to a recession and undermine the Trump administration's other policy goals.
- The speakers emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between trade deficits, capital surpluses, and economic well-being.
- The podcast highlights the complexities of trade policy and the need for careful consideration of the potential consequences of tariffs.
Chat with this Video
AI-PoweredHi! I can answer questions about this video "Ep60 “A Trade Deficit? More Like a Capital Surplus” with John Cochrane". What would you like to know?
Chat is based on the transcript of this video and may not be 100% accurate.