End of FCAS 'flagship project' marks setback for Franco-German cooperation and European defence

Key Concepts

• FCAS (Future Combat Air System): A collaborative European defense project intended to develop a next-generation fighter jet system, now facing significant restructuring or cancellation of its core aircraft component.
• GCAP (Global Combat Air Program): A competing international fighter jet project involving the UK, Italy, and Japan.
• European Strategic Autonomy: The political goal of reducing European dependence on the United States for defense capabilities.
• Optionally Manned Systems: Aircraft designed to be flown by a human pilot or operated remotely/autonomously, reflecting modern shifts in aerial warfare.
• Industrial Competition: The tension between major defense contractors (Airbus vs. Dassault) regarding intellectual property and project leadership.

---

1. The Status of the FCAS Program

The interview addresses the effective collapse of the fighter jet component of the FCAS program. Ulrike Franke notes that this outcome was anticipated since November, though she expresses frustration that no immediate, well-developed alternatives were presented alongside the announcement. The project, which began in 2017, is described as a "project of another era" that failed to adapt to the changing landscape of warfare, particularly the lessons learned from the war in Ukraine regarding the role of drones and uncrewed systems.

2. The Role of Dassault and Structural Design Flaws

A central point of contention is the role of the French company Dassault. While German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius and various military officials have criticized Dassault for being "difficult to deal with," Franke offers a more nuanced perspective:

• Leadership Disputes: Dassault sought full control over the program, which created friction with other partners.
• Design Flaw: Franke argues the project suffered from a fundamental structural error: it forced two direct competitors—Airbus (Germany) and Dassault (France)—to collaborate without sufficient incentives to share intellectual property.
• Protectionism: Dassault was reportedly hesitant to share expertise, fearing that Airbus would leverage that knowledge to become a stronger future competitor.

3. Future Options for European Defense

With the FCAS aircraft component stalled, Germany and France face several strategic paths:

• Buying American: Germany is already procuring F-35s for NATO nuclear sharing operations. While this is an option, it contradicts the goal of European strategic autonomy.
• Joining GCAP: The British-Italian-Japanese project is identified as the primary alternative for European nations looking to collaborate on a next-generation fighter.
• National Projects: Germany is exploring a German-led project, though Franke notes this is not yet a "done deal."
• Timeline: Despite the loss of nine years of development, Franke believes that meeting the original 2040–2045 operational timeline remains feasible if the nations act decisively.

4. The Evolution of Aerial Warfare

Franke addresses whether expensive, crewed fighter jets are becoming obsolete:

• The "Optionally Manned" Approach: She argues that while drones are critical, crewed systems are not yet passe. Future designs should prioritize "optionally manned" capabilities, allowing for human intervention when necessary while utilizing autonomous technology for high-risk environments.
• Technological Shift: The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered the approach to European security, rendering the 2017-era requirements of the FCAS project outdated.

5. Franco-German Cooperation

Despite the failure of this "flagship project," Franke maintains a balanced view of the bilateral relationship:

• Resilience: She disputes the notion that Franco-German military cooperation has failed entirely, citing the existence of the Franco-German Brigade and ongoing collaboration in other areas like the "cloud" element of FCAS and nuclear defense umbrellas.
• Moving Forward: Franke suggests that ending the problematic FCAS aircraft project might actually be beneficial for the long-term relationship, as it removes a source of constant friction and forces both nations to find new, more viable avenues for cooperation.

Synthesis

The collapse of the FCAS fighter jet program represents a significant setback for European defense integration, driven by industrial protectionism and a failure to align the interests of major defense contractors. However, the failure serves as a catalyst for re-evaluating European defense strategy. The path forward involves a choice between joining existing international consortia like GCAP, increasing reliance on US hardware, or developing new, more agile collaborative frameworks that account for the modern realities of drone warfare and the necessity of shared intellectual property.