Donald Trump 'hasn't read the psychology of Iranians well at all', military expert says

Key Concepts

• Strait of Hormuz Blockade: A US-led naval restriction on shipping to and from Iranian ports.
• Freedom of Navigation: The international legal principle allowing vessels to pass through international straits without interference.
• Brinkmanship: The practice of pushing dangerous events to the verge of disaster to achieve the most advantageous outcome.
• Proxy Warfare: The use of third-party groups (e.g., Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas) by Iran to conduct operations against US interests.
• Battle Damage Assessment (BDA): The process of evaluating the effectiveness of military strikes.
• Innocent Passage: A concept in maritime law that allows vessels to pass through the territorial waters of another state, provided they do not threaten the peace or security of the coastal state.

---

1. The Blockade of the Strait of Hormuz

The US military has initiated a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, targeting all vessels traveling to and from Iranian ports. President Donald Trump stated that the objective is to isolate Iran economically, claiming that "Iran is doing absolutely no business." The US has threatened to eliminate any "fast attack ships" that approach the blockade zone.

2. International and Legal Perspectives

• Condemnation: France, Britain, and other NATO nations have criticized the move, arguing it risks escalating regional tensions.
• Legal Standing: The United Nations maritime agency and international legal experts emphasize that the blockade violates the "Law of the Sea" conventions. These laws guarantee the right of "innocent passage" and "freedom of navigation," prohibiting the imposition of tolls or blockades in international straits.
• China’s Stance: China has formally opposed the blockade, asserting that it contradicts the interests of the international community.

3. Iranian Response and Strategic Context

• Military Threat: Iran’s military issued a warning: "If the security of the ports of the Islamic Republic of Iran... is threatened, no port in the Persian Gulf or in the Sea of Oman will remain safe."
• Mining Operations: According to intelligence analysis, Iran has reportedly mined primary sea routes through Omani territorial waters in response to the blockade.
• Historical Context: Philip Ingram, a former British intelligence officer, noted that the current instability is a direct consequence of the February 28th US-Israeli bombing campaign against Iran. Prior to this date, shipping through the Strait was largely unhindered.

4. Expert Analysis: The "Brinkmanship" Strategy

Philip Ingram provided a critical assessment of the situation:

• Misreading the Adversary: Ingram argues that President Trump has failed to understand the psychology of the Iranian leadership, who are unlikely to capitulate under pressure.
• The "140 Attacks" Argument: Ingram defends the US military response by citing that US interests were attacked 140 times by Iranian proxies (Quds Force, Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas) in the year preceding the conflict. He argues that the US was effectively "hit 140 times" before choosing to respond.
• European "Naivety": Ingram characterizes the European response as "naive," suggesting that by publicly condemning Trump rather than providing quiet political support, European leaders have lost their ability to influence US policy from the inside.
• The Role of NATO Bases: Despite public condemnation, Ingram points out that European nations are providing logistical support, base access, and battle damage assessment capabilities to the US, creating a disconnect between their public rhetoric and their military actions.

5. Future Outlook

The situation remains a high-stakes game of brinkmanship. The primary scenarios identified include:

1. Continued Blockade: Maintaining the status quo, which will likely increase pressure on the global economy and domestic US politics.
2. Renewed Military Action: If the blockade fails to force Iran to the negotiating table, Ingram suggests the US may return to a more aggressive bombing campaign to target remaining Iranian political and military leadership.

Synthesis

The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz represents a significant escalation in the US-Iran conflict, moving from proxy skirmishes to a direct challenge to global maritime trade. While the US justifies the move as a necessary response to years of Iranian aggression, the action faces severe international legal challenges and has strained relations with European allies. The conflict is currently defined by a cycle of military posturing and economic isolation, with little evidence that either side is prepared to return to diplomatic negotiations without further military escalation.