‘Don’t roll your eyes’: When Rep Luna snapped at Walz over alleged Communist China ties |2025 REWIND

Congressional Hearing on Riot Funding & Chinese Influence

Key Concepts:

• PSL (Party for Socialism and Liberation): An organization identified as the primary organizer of recent riots, allegedly funded by Neville Singham and, ultimately, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
• Neville Singham: A billionaire Chinese activist accused of funneling CCP funds into US protest movements.
• Chinese Communist Party (CCP): The ruling political party of China, alleged to be exerting influence over US political movements and protests.
• Influence Operations: Covert attempts to manipulate political processes, public opinion, or policies in a target country.
• Earmarks: Funds allocated for specific projects within a larger budget, often directed to particular districts or organizations.
• Pro-Maoist: Supporting the ideology and policies of Mao Zedong, the former leader of China.
• National Endowment for Democracy (NED): A US-based non-profit organization that promotes democracy abroad, contrasted with funding from George Soros and the CCP.

I. Allegations of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Funding of US Protests

Representative Luna initiated the questioning by asserting a direct financial link between recent riots and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). She stated that the riots were not genuinely about immigration or illegal immigrants, pointing out that protests didn’t occur during the Obama administration despite his high deportation rates. Instead, she alleges these protests are being strategically exploited to advance a communist agenda.

Luna specifically identified the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) as the organizing force behind the riots, funded by billionaire Chinese activist Neville Singham. Singham, she claims, resides partially in Shanghai and channels CCP funds into these protests. Luna further contends that this tactic of utilizing minority groups – mirroring the use of Black people during BLM protests – is a deliberate strategy to promote communism under the guise of social justice. She emphasized that following the money reveals its ultimate source: the CCP.

II. Questioning of Governor Waltz & Examination of Financial Ties

Representative Luna directly questioned Governor Waltz regarding his potential participation in a June 14th Twin Cities “No King Rally,” presenting evidence of his advertised appearance on X (formerly Twitter). She also questioned his history of travel to China, confirming he visited the country between 15 and 30 times, in addition to having resided there.

A key point of contention was a $5 million earmark secured by Governor Waltz during his time in Congress. $2 million of this funding went to the Harmell Institute, which collaborated with the Wuhan Institute. Furthermore, Luna revealed that the Department of Homeland Security possessed an internal memo identifying Governor Waltz as a “prime target for influence operations” by the Chinese government.

Luna also highlighted the rally’s funding sources, including Christy Walton (heir to the Walmart fortune) and the Chinese Progressive Association, which she described as “pro-Maoist.” She contrasted this with funding from the National Endowment for Democracy and criticized the perceived double standard regarding billionaire influence in politics, specifically referencing George Soros’s $260 million contribution through USAID.

III. Discussion of Immigration Policy & Accusations of Communist Agenda

Luna argued that current immigration policies are similar to those enacted during the Obama administration, yet are being falsely portrayed as oppressive. She asserted that open border policies harm both Americans and undocumented immigrants, and that assistance offered to undocumented immigrants is not rooted in genuine empathy.

She reiterated her claim that the use of minority groups in protests is a tactic to advance a communist agenda, stating, “When you use brown people…you’re essentially using your platform…to usher in communism.” She urged elected officials to be aware of these alleged financial ties and to prioritize American values.

IV. Exchange Regarding Evidence & Further Investigation

Following Luna’s initial statement, there was a brief exchange regarding the evidence supporting her claims. Luna offered to provide documentation, including a letter to Neville Singham requesting testimony and financial records, signed by all members of the Oversight Committee.

The Chairman expressed a desire for a formal hearing where evidence could be presented, and Luna agreed to participate. Additional information was brought up regarding Singham’s funding of Code Pink through his wife.

V. Unrelated Submission of Record

Representative Donald submitted a letter from Congressman Richie Torres to Governor Hokll regarding cost overruns at the Penn Station Center, totaling $7 billion, and the role of the MTA chairman appointed by the Governor.

Notable Quotes:

• Representative Luna: “When you use brown people…you’re essentially using your platform…to usher in communism.”
• Governor Waltz: “I think he [Barack Obama] did a good job.” (in response to whether Obama was a good president)
• Representative Luna: “Now I’m informing you. So now you guys can make your decisions, but please be informed, sir.”

Technical Terms:

• Earmark: A provision in a bill that allocates funds for a specific project or purpose.
• Influence Operation: A coordinated effort to shape public opinion or political outcomes in a foreign country.
• Pro-Maoist: Adhering to the political ideology of Mao Zedong, emphasizing revolutionary communism.
• USAID: United States Agency for International Development, a government agency responsible for international development assistance.

Logical Connections:

The hearing followed a logical progression, starting with the broad allegation of CCP influence, then focusing on specific individuals (Governor Waltz) and organizations (PSL, Chinese Progressive Association), and finally addressing the broader implications for US policy and values. The questioning aimed to establish a direct link between financial contributions and political actions.

Data & Research Findings:

• Alleged $260 million contribution from George Soros through USAID.
• $5 million earmark secured by Governor Waltz, with $2 million allocated to the Harmell Institute.
• Alleged funding of PSL by Neville Singham, linked to the CCP.

Conclusion:

Representative Luna presented a strong, albeit controversial, argument alleging a coordinated effort by the CCP to influence US politics through funding of protest movements and targeting of specific individuals. The hearing highlighted concerns about foreign interference and the potential for exploitation of social justice movements for political gain. The call for further investigation and a formal hearing suggests a commitment to exploring these allegations further, though the validity of the claims remains to be substantiated with concrete evidence.