Does Trump's 20-point plan offer the possibility of lasting peace? | DW News

Key Concepts Gaza Ceasefire, Hostage Deal, Trump Peace Plan, Indirect Talks, IDF Withdrawal, Hamas Decommissioning, Palestinian Statehood, Two-State Solution, Nakba of 1948, Operation Protective Edge, Israeli Siege on Gaza, Humanitarian Aid, Famine, Northern Ireland Model, Buffer Zone, Special Security Force for Gaza, Political Polarization, Palestinian National Authority (PNA), Transnational Terror Groups, Self-determination, Aid Obstruction, Joint Force.

The Gaza Ceasefire: Negotiation, Implementation, and Future Challenges

The video transcript details the recently enacted ceasefire in Gaza, brokered by US President Donald Trump, and explores its immediate implications and long-term prospects through expert analysis. The conflict, lasting two years, has resulted in tens of thousands of lives lost, inflicted famine on much of the population, and destroyed approximately 80% of Gaza's buildings.

Negotiation of the Trump Peace Plan

The agreement, which Trump claims only he could achieve, came after months of gridlock. The breakthrough began in August with Trump's announcement of a "big meeting" to discuss a comprehensive post-war plan. Key figures in the negotiation included Trump's special envoy Steve Witkov and his son-in-law Jared Kushner. Urgency escalated after a controversial Israeli missile strike in Qatar targeting Hamas political leaders who were negotiating with Witkov. Trump expressed disapproval, leading Witkov and Kushner to intensify talks with Qatar.

Momentum further gathered at the UN General Assembly in late September, where Trump met with Arab leaders. He reportedly listened to their concerns, such as Israel's apparent plans to annex the West Bank, which Trump assured them would "never happen." Arab leaders also clarified acceptable terms for Palestinians in any future deal. Following this, Witkov and Kushner narrowed differences with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, leading to Trump's announcement that Netanyahu had agreed to his proposal. Hamas's response was a "yes, but with conditions," which Trump chose to interpret as acceptance, leading to the approval of Phase One of the deal, with Phase Two details still pending.

Current Situation and Immediate Needs in Gaza

Palestinian writer and analyst Muhammad Jiada, speaking from Copenhagen, described the "immense happiness" of families being reunited, including captives and hostages, and Palestinian families returning to northern Gaza. However, he emphasized the "immense devastation," with virtually every home either bombed, burned, detonated, bulldozed, or heavily damaged beyond habitation. Jiada highlighted the catastrophic scale, drawing parallels to the "Nakba of 1948," when his grandfather was displaced to Gaza and lost everything but managed to rebuild.

Immediate needs are critical: "tents, prefabricated homes, housing units, caravans, or containers" are urgently required, as stipulated in the ceasefire agreement but not fulfilled in an earlier January agreement. A single tent currently costs about €1,000 inside Gaza. People are moving to the northern Gaza Strip, willing to "burrow under the rubble of their homes" or sleep in the ground floors of bombed buildings.

Contentious Issues and Long-Term Prospects

Jiada outlined several contentious issues: the decommissioning of Hamas, the IDF withdrawal from Gaza, and a path towards a Palestinian state. He stressed the need for "effective pressure from the White House as well as Europe" to ensure both sides adhere to the deal.

Reconstruction Challenges: Jiada noted that reconstruction from the 2014 "Operation Protective Edge" war was never completed due to the Israeli siege on Gaza, underscoring the critical need for the siege to be lifted to allow unhindered reconstruction.

Disarming Hamas and IDF Withdrawal: Jiada expressed optimism that disarming Hamas of its offensive weaponry (rockets) would not be difficult, as they have few left and are reluctant to use them. The main point of contention is Hamas's desire to retain "defensive weaponry" (light firearms, anti-tank missiles) as a guarantee against an IDF re-entry or insurgency. Jiada proposed the "Northern Ireland model," where weapons are stored in a warehouse supervised by mediators like Egypt or Qatar, acting as "leverage" to ensure the agreement's fulfillment. He cited the Good Friday Agreement (1998), where IRA decommissioning took until 2007.

Trump's Plan and Two-State Solution: Jiada stated that an earlier version of Trump's plan was "way better" and more concrete, but Netanyahu, with Kushner and Witkov, manipulated it, adding loopholes and veto rights. Despite this, Jiada hopes the "train of peacemaking" will gain "heavy momentum," making it difficult for Netanyahu to backtrack. He highlighted an "unprecedented" joint force (US, UAE, Qatar, Egypt, Turkey) established to monitor the ceasefire and prevent violations. However, Palestinian statehood remains a "long shot" due to a lack of support in the Israeli mainstream political environment. Jiada concluded that neither side's military option worked, leaving only one path: to "end" the conflict, not just manage it.

Challenges to Ceasefire Durability

Middle East security analyst Hakob Schindler discussed the immediate steps and future hurdles. The first concrete step, Israel's withdrawal from Gaza City, was successfully completed. The handover of living hostages is expected to be low-risk, but the handover of deceased hostages' bodies carries some risk if Hamas claims inability to find all.

Harder Steps Ahead: The next, much harder step involves the IDF's full withdrawal (except for a buffer zone) in exchange for Hamas disarming. Schindler identified a "logical spanner in the works": who would Hamas hand weapons to if the IDF withdraws simultaneously? This requires a "special security force for Gaza," mentioned in the plan, but details on committed countries, soldiers, weapons, mandate, or cooperation with the IDF are lacking.

Political Polarization: Schindler acknowledged deep political polarization in Israel and divisions among Palestinians, leading to "deep distrust." While radical right Israeli ministers like Smotrich and Ben-Gvir are unhappy, the cabinet voted for the plan, and their "desperation to stay in the government will be greater than their ambitions for Gaza Strip."

Hamas's Future: The deal does not require Hamas to dissolve. Fighters who swear off the organization receive full amnesty, even for October 7 actions, while others can leave (though the destination country is unknown). Schindler noted that Hamas as an organization will not end according to this deal. He raised concerns about Hamas's future intentions: dominating Palestinian politics, using West Bank cells for attacks, or strengthening its profile as a "transnational international terror group" with attacks outside Israel/Palestine.

Warning Signs and US Leverage

Natasha Hall, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, cautioned that the ceasefire is "not too big to fail."

Immediate Stumbling Blocks: A "monumental relief effort" is needed, especially in northern Gaza where famine is spreading. This requires "free access for aid personnel" and a "very very quick turnaround" for trucks and aid workers, details of which are currently lacking. Aid obstruction, as seen in Syria and Ethiopia, could lead to "indirect violence."

Post-Hostage Release Risks: It is "unclear if Israel will return essentially to violence" once all hostages are freed, which could remove remaining opposition for Netanyahu within Israel.

US Leverage: While the international community has limited options, Washington possesses "quite a lot of leverage" through diplomatic and military aid to Israel. Consistent patience and commitment from the US are crucial to ensure the ceasefire holds, including cessation of violence and unhindered humanitarian aid access.

Gaza's Future Governance: Hall identified Gaza's future governance as a "huge liability." Palestinians were not part of the negotiations, and the proposed "apolitical technocratic Palestinian body" has not even been greenlighted by Netanyahu. The core of the conflict, Palestinian "self-determination," has been unaddressed for decades. Without it, Hall fears the "wider war" will restart.

International Attention Span: Hall expressed concern about the "attention span of President Trump" and the international community. She warned that after ceasefires, attention often wanes, allowing problems to arise, citing Syria and Ethiopia as examples. Sustained international commitment is vital to prevent this.

Conclusion

The Gaza ceasefire represents a fragile but potentially significant step towards de-escalation, largely driven by US diplomatic efforts. While immediate relief and hostage returns offer a glimmer of hope, the path to lasting peace is fraught with challenges. These include the immense humanitarian crisis in Gaza, the complex process of disarming Hamas while ensuring Israeli withdrawal, the deep political divisions within both Israeli and Palestinian societies, and the unresolved question of Palestinian self-determination. The success of this agreement hinges on sustained international pressure, particularly from the United States, to ensure adherence to its terms, facilitate reconstruction, and address the fundamental issues underlying the decades-long conflict. The experts agree that without addressing these core issues and maintaining vigilant oversight, the ceasefire remains vulnerable to unraveling, potentially leading to a resumption of hostilities.