Does Australia's reliance on AUKUS leave us vulnerable? | 7.30

Key Concepts

• AUKUS: A trilateral security partnership between Australia, the UK, and the US, primarily focused on acquiring nuclear-powered submarines.
• Virginia-class Submarines: US-designed nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs) intended for the Australian Navy.
• Collins-class Submarines: Australia’s current diesel-electric submarine fleet, currently undergoing a costly "Life of Type Extension" (LOTE).
• SSN-AUKUS: The future joint submarine program between Australia and the UK to build a new class of nuclear-powered submarines.
• Capability Gap: The strategic risk that Australia may be left without sufficient undersea warfare or strike capabilities if current acquisition programs fail or are delayed.
• Senate Estimates: A parliamentary process where government departments are held accountable for their spending and management.

---

1. The AUKUS Submarine Acquisition Shift

The Australian government has revised its acquisition plan for Virginia-class submarines. Originally, the plan included two used and one new submarine. Defense Minister Richard Miles announced that Australia will now acquire three secondhand Virginia-class submarines.

• Government Rationale: Minister Miles argues this is a "simpler pathway" and ensures all acquired boats are of the same type.
• Criticism: Critics, including former defense official Michael Shoebridge and Shadow Defense Minister James Patterson, argue that secondhand boats have shorter operational lifespans, higher maintenance costs, and lower capability compared to new models.
• US Production Issues: There is growing concern regarding the US industrial base's ability to meet production targets. The US currently produces approximately 1.3 boats per year but needs to reach 2.3 to meet its own needs and AUKUS commitments.

2. The Collins-class "Debacle"

The government is currently managing a $11 billion life extension program for the aging Collins-class fleet.

• Auditor General’s Report: The Department of Defence was accused of mismanaging the program, with reports of nearly $700 million wasted on unnecessary design work and equipment.
• Strategic Risk: Critics argue that the failure to manage the Collins-class extension is a "bad omen" for the significantly more complex AUKUS program.

3. Political and Financial Context

• Budgetary Pressure: The government faces criticism for prioritizing AUKUS spending while cutting other areas of the defense budget and facing broader economic challenges (e.g., NDIS cuts, cost-of-living pressures).
• Public Sentiment: Recent polling (Red Bridge/Accent Research) shows a decline in support for major parties, with One Nation polling at 31% primary support, signaling voter dissatisfaction.
• Liberal Party Strategy: The Liberal Party has appointed former PM Tony Abbott as party president to help reorganize. Shadow Defense Minister James Patterson emphasized the need for "conviction, unity, discipline, focus, and competence" to regain voter trust.

4. Opposition Perspective: Contingency Planning

Shadow Defense Minister James Patterson maintains bipartisan support for AUKUS but advocates for "prudent contingency planning."

• The Argument: Because the AUKUS program is high-risk, Australia must prepare for a potential "capability gap."
• Proposed Solutions: Patterson suggests exploring supplementary capabilities, such as B-21 Raider bombers, to ensure Australia maintains long-range stealth strike capabilities if the submarine program faces further delays.
• Defense Spending: Patterson disputes the government’s claims of increased defense spending, citing an $800 million cut between the current and next financial year and accusing the government of "accounting games" (e.g., including pensions in defense spending calculations). He advocates for spending 3% of GDP on defense, as recommended by experts like Sir Angus Houston.

5. Notable Quotes

• Joe Hockey (Former US Ambassador): "For the first time, I'm a little nervous about the Virginia [class production]."
• Michael Shoebridge (Former Defense Official): "The defense organization and the Navy have chronically mismanaged the only submarine we have. This is not just a national embarrassment. This endangers our security."
• James Patterson (Shadow Defense Minister): "If it was optimal three years ago [to get one new boat], what has changed in the last three years? ... The government is not being transparent about that."

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The AUKUS program is currently at a critical juncture characterized by technical, industrial, and political friction. The shift to acquiring only secondhand Virginia-class submarines, coupled with the mismanagement of the Collins-class life extension, has fueled concerns regarding Australia's future maritime security. While the government maintains that the AUKUS pathway is sound, the opposition is increasingly calling for transparency and the development of contingency plans to mitigate the risk of a significant capability gap. The program remains the most expensive acquisition in Australian history, and its success is now tied to the ability of the US and UK industrial bases to overcome their own production and management challenges.